Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
R. David Evans
dblp:146/9586
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Learning paradigms · 28% Representation and self-supervised learning · 28% Efficient and distributed learning · 26% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video coding · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ConR: Contrastive Regularizer for Deep Imbalanced Regression · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
contrastive regularization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ConR: Contrastive Regularizer for Deep Imbalanced Regression · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › imbalanced learning
deep imbalanced regression |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ConR: Contrastive Regularizer for Deep Imbalanced Regression · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
imbalanced learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ConR: Contrastive Regularizer for Deep Imbalanced Regression · ICLR 2024 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
redundant computation elimination |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Anticipating and eliminating redundant computations in accelerated sparse training · ISCA 2022 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator › DNN training accelerator
sparse DNN training accelerator |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Anticipating and eliminating redundant computations in accelerated sparse training · ISCA 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › neural network compression
activation compression |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | AC-GC: Lossy Activation Compression with Guaranteed Convergence · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence guarantees |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | AC-GC: Lossy Activation Compression with Guaranteed Convergence · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | AC-GC: Lossy Activation Compression with Guaranteed Convergence · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | AC-GC: Lossy Activation Compression with Guaranteed Convergence · NeurIPS 2021 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | JPEG-ACT: Accelerating Deep Learning via Transform-based Lossy Compression · ISCA 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
sparse training |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Anticipating and eliminating redundant computations in accelerated sparse training · ISCA 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
memory-efficient training |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | AC-GC: Lossy Activation Compression with Guaranteed Convergence · NeurIPS 2021 |
Image and video coding
lossy compression |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | JPEG-ACT: Accelerating Deep Learning via Transform-based Lossy Compression · ISCA 2020 |
Image and video coding
transform coding |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | JPEG-ACT: Accelerating Deep Learning via Transform-based Lossy Compression · ISCA 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
lossy activation compression · 1.3JPEG compression · 1.3regularizer · 0.8contrastive learning · 0.8stochastic gradient descent convergence analysis · 0.5lossy compression · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | ConR: Contrastive Regularizer for Deep Imbalanced RegressionabstractImbalanced distributions are ubiquitous in real-world data. They create constraints on Deep Neural Networks to represent the minority labels and avoid bias towards majority labels. The extensive body of imbalanced approaches address categorical label spaces but fail to effectively extend to regression problems where the label space is continuous. Local and global correlations among continuous labels provide valuable insights towards effectively modelling relationships in feature space. In this work, we propose ConR, a contrastive regularizer that models global and local label similarities in feature space and prevents the features of minority samples from being collapsed into their majority neighbours. ConR discerns the disagreements between the label space and feature space, and imposes
a penalty on these disagreements. ConR minds the continuous nature of label space with two main strategies in a contrastive manner: incorrect proximities are penalized proportionate to the label similarities and the correct ones are encouraged to model local similarities. ConR consolidates essential considerations into a generic, easy-to-integrate, and efficient method that effectively addresses deep imbalanced regression. Moreover, ConR is orthogonal to existing approaches and smoothly extends to uni- and multi-dimensional label spaces. Our comprehensive experiments show that ConR significantly boosts the performance of all the state-of-the-art methods on four large-scale deep imbalanced regression benchmarks. Mahsa Keramati, Lili Meng, R. David Evans |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2022 | Anticipating and eliminating redundant computations in accelerated sparse trainingabstractDeep Neural Networks (DNNs) are the state of art in image, speech, and text processing. To address long training times and high energy consumption, custom accelerators can exploit sparsity, that is zero-valued weights, activations, and gradients. Proposed sparse Convolution Neural Network (CNN) accelerators support training with no more than one dynamic sparse convolution input. Among existing accelerator classes, the only ones supporting two-sided dynamic sparsity are outer-product-based accelerators. However, when mapping a convolution onto an outer product, multiplications occur that do not correspond to any valid output. These Redundant Cartesian Products (RCPs) decrease energy efficiency and performance. We observe that in sparse training, up to 90% of computations are RCPs resulting from the convolution of large matrices for weight updates during the backward pass of CNN training. Jonathan S. Lew, Yunpeng Liu 0007, Wenyi Gong, Negar Goli, R. David Evans, Tor M. Aamodt |
ISCA | 5 |
| 2021 | AC-GC: Lossy Activation Compression with Guaranteed ConvergenceabstractParallel hardware devices (e.g., graphics processor units) have limited high-bandwidth memory capacity.This negatively impacts the training of deep neural networks (DNNs) by increasing runtime and/or decreasing accuracy when reducing model and/or batch size to fit this capacity. Lossy compression is a promising approach to tackling memory capacity constraints, but prior approaches rely on hyperparameter search to achieve a suitable trade-off between convergence and compression, negating runtime benefits. In this paper we build upon recent developments on Stochastic Gradient Descent convergence to prove an upper bound on the expected loss increase when training with compressed activation storage. We then express activation compression error in terms of this bound, allowing the compression rate to adapt to training conditions automatically. The advantage of our approach, called AC-GC, over existing lossy compression frameworks is that, given a preset allowable increase in loss, significant compression without significant increase in error can be achieved with a single training run. When combined with error-bounded methods, AC-GC achieves 15.1x compression with an average accuracy change of 0.1% on text and image datasets. AC-GC functions on any model composed of the layers analyzed and, by avoiding compression rate search, reduces overall training time by 4.6x over SuccessiveHalving. R. David Evans, Tor M. Aamodt |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | JPEG-ACT: Accelerating Deep Learning via Transform-based Lossy CompressionabstractA reduction in the time it takes to train machine learning models can be translated into improvements in accuracy. important factor that increases training time in deep neural networks (DNNs) is the need to store large amounts of temporary data during the back-propagation algorithm. To enable training very large models this temporary data can be offloaded from limited size GPU memory to CPU memory but this data movement incurs large performance overheads. We observe that in one important class of DNNs, convolutional neural networks (CNNs), there is spatial correlation in these temporary values. We propose JPEG for ACTivations (JPEGACT), a lossy activation offload accelerator for training CNNs that works by discarding redundant spatial information. JPEGACT adapts the well-known JPEG algorithm from 2D image compression to activation compression. We show how to optimize the JPEG algorithm so as to ensure convergence and maintain accuracy during training. JPEG-ACT achieves 2.4× higher training performance compared to prior offload accelerators, and 1.6× compared to prior activation compression methods. An efficient hardware implementation allows JPEG-ACT to consume less than 1% of the power and area of a modern GPU. R. David Evans, Lufei Liu 0001, Tor M. Aamodt |
ISCA | 1 |