Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiaoyue Pan
dblp:147/5306
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-0846-3208ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PartIR: Composing SPMD Partitioning Strategies for Machine Learning · ASPLOS (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › parallelization
model partitioning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PartIR: Composing SPMD Partitioning Strategies for Machine Learning · ASPLOS (1) 2025 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallelization strategies |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PartIR: Composing SPMD Partitioning Strategies for Machine Learning · ASPLOS (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
schedule-like API · 1.7intermediate representation rewriting · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | PartIR: Composing SPMD Partitioning Strategies for Machine LearningabstractTraining modern large neural networks (NNs) requires a combination of parallelization strategies, including data, model, or optimizer sharding. To address the growing complexity of these strategies, we introduce PartIR, a hardware-and-runtime agnostic NN partitioning system. PartIR is: 1) Expressive: It allows for the composition of multiple sharding strategies, whether user-defined or automatically derived; 2) Decoupled: the strategies are separate from the ML implementation; and 3) Predictable: It follows a set of well-defined general rules to partition the NN. PartIR utilizes a schedule-like API that incrementally rewrites the ML program intermediate representation (IR) after each strategy, allowing simulators and users to verify the strategy's performance. PartIR has been successfully used both for training large models and across diverse model architectures, demonstrating its predictability, expressiveness, and performance. Sami Alabed, Daniel Belov, Bart Chrzaszcz, Juliana Franco, Dominik Grewe, Dougal Maclaurin, James Molloy, Tom Natan, Tamara Norman, Xiaoyue Pan, Adam Paszke, Norman A. Rink, Michael Schaarschmidt, Timur Sitdikov, Agnieszka Swietlik, Dimitrios Vytiniotis, Joel Wee |
ASPLOS (1) | 10 |
| 2015 | A modeling framework for reuse distance-based estimation of cache performanceabstractWe develop an analytical modeling framework for efficient prediction of cache miss ratios based on reuse distance distributions. The only input needed for our predictions is the reuse distance distribution of a program execution: previous work has shown that they can be obtained with very small overhead by sampling from native executions. This should be contrasted with previous approaches that base predictions on stack distance distributions, whose collection need significantly larger overhead or additional hardware support. The predictions are based on a uniform modeling framework which can be specialized for a variety of cache replacement policies, including Random, LRU, PLRU, and MRU (aka. bit-PLRU), and for arbitrary values of cache size and cache associativity. We evaluate our modeling framework with the SPEC CPU 2006 benchmark suite over a set of cache configurations with varying cache size, associativity and replacement policy. The introduced inaccuracies were generally below 1% for the model of the policy, and additionally around 2% when set-local reuse distances must be estimated from global reuse distance distributions. The inaccuracy introduced by sampling is significantly smaller. Xiaoyue Pan, Bengt Jonsson 0001 |
ISPASS | 1 |
| 2014 | Modeling cache coherence misses on multicoresabstractWhile maintaining the coherency of private caches, invalidation-based cache coherence protocols introduce cache coherence misses. We address the problem of predicting the number of cache coherence misses in the private cache of a parallel application when running on a multicore system with an invalidation-based cache coherence protocol. We propose three new performance models (uniform, phased and symmetric) for estimating the number of coherence misses from information about inter-core data sharing patterns and the individual core's data reuse patterns. The inputs to the uniform and phased models are the write frequency and reuse distance distribution of shared data from different cores. This input can be obtained either from profiling the target application on a single core or by analyzing the data access pattern statically, and does not need a detailed simulation of the pattern of interleaving accesses to shared data. The output of the models is an estimated number of coherence misses of the target application. The output can be combined with the number of other kinds of misses to estimate the total number of misses in each core's private cache. This output can also be used to guide program optimization to improve cache performance. We evaluate our models with a set of benchmarks from the PARSEC benchmark suite on real hardware. Xiaoyue Pan, Bengt Jonsson 0001 |
ISPASS | 1 |