Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nathan Sudermann-Merx
dblp:147/7622
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
acquisition function optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Tree ensemble kernels for Bayesian optimization with known constraints over mixed-feature spaces · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Tree ensemble kernels for Bayesian optimization with known constraints over mixed-feature spaces · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
constrained bayesian optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Tree ensemble kernels for Bayesian optimization with known constraints over mixed-feature spaces · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tree-ensemble kernel · 0.6gaussian process regression · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Tree ensemble kernels for Bayesian optimization with known constraints over mixed-feature spacesabstractTree ensembles can be well-suited for black-box optimization tasks such as algorithm tuning and neural architecture search, as they achieve good predictive performance with little or no manual tuning, naturally handle discrete feature spaces, and are relatively insensitive to outliers in the training data. Two well-known challenges in using tree ensembles for black-box optimization are (i) effectively quantifying model uncertainty for exploration and (ii) optimizing over the piece-wise constant acquisition function. To address both points simultaneously, we propose using the kernel interpretation of tree ensembles as a Gaussian Process prior to obtain model variance estimates, and we develop a compatible optimization formulation for the acquisition function. The latter further allows us to seamlessly integrate known constraints to improve sampling efficiency by considering domain-knowledge in engineering settings and modeling search space symmetries, e.g., hierarchical relationships in neural architecture search. Our framework performs as well as state-of-the-art methods for unconstrained black-box optimization over continuous/discrete features and outperforms competing methods for problems combining mixed-variable feature spaces and known input constraints. Alexander Thebelt, Calvin Tsay, Robert M. Lee, Nathan Sudermann-Merx, David Walz, Behrang Shafei, Ruth Misener |
NeurIPS | 4 |