Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nathan Sudermann-Merx

dblp:147/7622 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
acquisition function optimization
0.612022
Tree ensemble kernels for Bayesian optimization with known constraints over mixed-feature spaces · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.612022
Tree ensemble kernels for Bayesian optimization with known constraints over mixed-feature spaces · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
constrained bayesian optimization
0.612022
Tree ensemble kernels for Bayesian optimization with known constraints over mixed-feature spaces · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tree-ensemble kernel · 0.6gaussian process regression · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Tree ensemble kernels for Bayesian optimization with known constraints over mixed-feature spaces
abstract
Tree ensembles can be well-suited for black-box optimization tasks such as algorithm tuning and neural architecture search, as they achieve good predictive performance with little or no manual tuning, naturally handle discrete feature spaces, and are relatively insensitive to outliers in the training data. Two well-known challenges in using tree ensembles for black-box optimization are (i) effectively quantifying model uncertainty for exploration and (ii) optimizing over the piece-wise constant acquisition function. To address both points simultaneously, we propose using the kernel interpretation of tree ensembles as a Gaussian Process prior to obtain model variance estimates, and we develop a compatible optimization formulation for the acquisition function. The latter further allows us to seamlessly integrate known constraints to improve sampling efficiency by considering domain-knowledge in engineering settings and modeling search space symmetries, e.g., hierarchical relationships in neural architecture search. Our framework performs as well as state-of-the-art methods for unconstrained black-box optimization over continuous/discrete features and outperforms competing methods for problems combining mixed-variable feature spaces and known input constraints.
Alexander Thebelt, Calvin Tsay, Robert M. Lee, Nathan Sudermann-Merx, David Walz, Behrang Shafei, Ruth Misener
NeurIPS4