Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Benjamin Strauss

dblp:148/4540 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0002-6856-6575ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 33% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 33% Language models and text generation · 33%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Knowledge graphs · 50% Data mining · 50%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › multilingual NLP
cognate identification
0.312017
Using Global Constraints and Reranking to Improve Cognates Detection · ACL (1) 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
global constraints
0.312017
Using Global Constraints and Reranking to Improve Cognates Detection · ACL (1) 2017
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
reranking
0.312017
Using Global Constraints and Reranking to Improve Cognates Detection · ACL (1) 2017
Data mining › text mining › information extraction
event extraction
0.312017
Learning to Extract Events from Knowledge Base Revisions · WWW 2017
Knowledge graphs
knowledge base population
0.312017
Learning to Extract Events from Knowledge Base Revisions · WWW 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

learning to extract events · 0.6rescoring · 0.3reranking · 0.3global constraints · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Using Global Constraints and Reranking to Improve Cognates Detection
abstract
Global constraints and reranking have not been used in cognates detection research to date.We propose methods for using global constraints by performing rescoring of the score matrices produced by state of the art cognates detection systems.Using global constraints to perform rescoring is complementary to state of the art methods for performing cognates detection and results in significant performance improvements beyond current state of the art performance on publicly available datasets with different language pairs and various conditions such as different levels of baseline state of the art performance and different data size conditions, including with more realistic large data size conditions than have been evaluated with in the past.
Michael Bloodgood, Benjamin Strauss
ACL (1)2
2017 Learning to Extract Events from Knowledge Base Revisions
abstract
Broad-coverage knowledge bases (KBs) such as Wikipedia, Freebase, Microsoft's Satori and Google's Knowledge Graph contain structured data describing real-world entities. These data sources have become increasingly important for a wide range of intelligent systems: from information retrieval and question answering, to Facebook's Graph Search, IBM's Watson, and more. Previous work on learning to populate knowledge bases from text has, for the most part, made the simplifying assumption that facts remain constant over time. But this is inaccurate -- we live in a rapidly changing world. Knowledge should not be viewed as a static snapshot, but instead a rapidly evolving set of facts that must change as the world changes.
Alexander Konovalov 0003, Benjamin Strauss, Alan Ritter, Brendan T. O'Connor 0001
WWW2
2014 Translation memory retrieval methods
abstract
Translation Memory (TM) systems are one of the most widely used translation technologies.An important part of TM systems is the matching algorithm that determines what translations get retrieved from the bank of available translations to assist the human translator.Although detailed accounts of the matching algorithms used in commercial systems can't be found in the literature, it is widely believed that edit distance algorithms are used.This paper investigates and evaluates the use of several matching algorithms, including the edit distance algorithm that is believed to be at the heart of most modern commercial TM systems.This paper presents results showing how well various matching algorithms correlate with human judgments of helpfulness (collected via crowdsourcing with Amazon's Mechanical Turk).A new algorithm based on weighted n-gram precision that can be adjusted for translator length preferences consistently returns translations judged to be most helpful by translators for multiple domains and language pairs.
Michael Bloodgood, Benjamin Strauss
EACL2