Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tina Woolf
dblp:149/2515
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 50% Information theory · 33% Approximation and online algorithms · 17% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
binary classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Simple Classification Using Binary Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018 |
Information theory › signal processing
compressed sensing |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Linear Convergence of Stochastic Iterative Greedy Algorithms With Sparse Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2017 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Linear Convergence of Stochastic Iterative Greedy Algorithms With Sparse Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2017 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › matrix optimization › matrix recovery
low-rank matrix recovery |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Linear Convergence of Stochastic Iterative Greedy Algorithms With Sparse Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2017 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
randomized greedy algorithm |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Linear Convergence of Stochastic Iterative Greedy Algorithms With Sparse Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2017 |
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
sparse recovery |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Linear Convergence of Stochastic Iterative Greedy Algorithms With Sparse Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2017 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Linear Convergence of Stochastic Iterative Greedy Algorithms With Sparse Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
low-dimensional projection · 0.3stochastic gradient descent · 0.3greedy algorithm · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Simple Classification Using Binary DataabstractBinary, or one-bit, representations of data arise naturally in many applications, and are appealing in both hardware implementations and algorithm design. In this work, we study the problem of data classification from binary data obtained from the sign pattern of low-dimensional projections and propose a framework with low computation and resource costs. We illustrate the utility of the proposed approach through stylized and realistic numerical experiments, and provide a theoretical analysis for a simple case. We hope that our framework and analysis will serve as a foundation for studying similar types of approaches. Deanna Needell, Rayan Saab, Tina Woolf |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2017 | Linear Convergence of Stochastic Iterative Greedy Algorithms With Sparse ConstraintsabstractMotivated by recent work on stochastic gradient descent methods, we develop two stochastic variants of greedy algorithms for possibly non-convex optimization problems with sparsity constraints. We prove linear convergence1in expectation to the solution within a specified tolerance. This generalized framework is specialized to the problems of sparse signal recovery in compressed sensing and low-rank matrix recovery, giving methods with provable convergence guarantees that often outperform their deterministic counterparts. We also analyze the settings, where gradients and projections can only be computed approximately, and prove the methods are robust to these approximations. We include many numerical experiments, which align with the theoretical analysis and demonstrate these improvements in several different settings. Deanna Needell, Tina Woolf |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 3 |