Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pieter Hens

dblp:15/1177 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Services computing and microservices · 50% Software maintenance and evolution · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Services computing and microservices
business process management
0.212014
Verification of Change in a Fragmented Event-Based Process Coordination Environment · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2014
Software maintenance and evolution
software evolution
0.212014
Verification of Change in a Fragmented Event-Based Process Coordination Environment · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

state reconstruction · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Process fragmentation, distribution and execution using an event-based interaction scheme
Pieter Hens, Monique Snoeck, Geert Poels, Manu De Backer
J. Syst. Softw.1
2014 Verification of Change in a Fragmented Event-Based Process Coordination Environment
abstract
To allow the distribution of control and visibility of cross-organizational process models and to increase availability and performance of the processes, a process model can be fragmented into logically different parts and distributed in the enterprise architecture. Fragmentation algorithms and execution environments that connect the fragmented process model parts together, recreating the original process execution semantics, have been proposed in earlier works. However, a critical challenge that is left open is the ability to independently change the control structure of a process fragment. This is not trivial as changing the control structure of a specific fragment could break the global process execution. The global process overview is also not available anymore because it is fragmented in the enactment environment and many independent control structure changes could have already been done. In this paper, we describe an approach based on state reconstruction, which enables checking the admissibility of changes made to the control structure of a process fragment in a fragmented event-based process enactment environment.
Pieter Hens, Monique Snoeck, Manu De Backer, Geert Poels
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput.1