Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Edward E. Rippetoe

dblp:15/5825 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video coding · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video coding › quality assessment
print quality assessment
0.112011
Characterization of Electrophotographic Print Artifacts: Banding, Jitter, and Ghosting · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wavelet filtering · 0.1template matching · 0.12-d spectral analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Characterization of Electrophotographic Print Artifacts: Banding, Jitter, and Ghosting
abstract
Electrophotographic (EP) print banding, jitter, and ghosting artifacts are common sources of print quality degradation. Traditionally, the characterization of banding and jitter artifacts relies mainly on the assumption that the defect has either a horizontal or vertical orientation which permits the simple 1-D analysis of the defect profile. However, this assumption can easily be violated if a small amount of printer or scanner skew is introduced to the analyzed images. In some cases, the defect can inherently be neither vertical nor horizontal. In this case, unless the defect orientation has been accurately detected before analysis, the 1-D-based approaches could bias the estimation of the defect severity. In this paper, we present an approach to characterize the jitter and banding artifacts of unrestricted orientation using wavelet filtering and 2-D spectral analysis. We also present a new system for detecting and quantifying ghosting defects. It includes a design for a printed test pattern to emphasize the ghosting defect and facilitate further processing and analysis. Wavelet filtering and a template matching technique are used to detect the ghost location along and across the scanned test pattern. A new metric is developed to quantify ghosting based upon its contrast, shape, and location consistency. Our experimental results show that the proposed approaches provide objective measures that quantify EP defects with a rank ordering correlation coefficient of 0.8 to 0.98, as compared to the subjective assessment of print quality experts.
Ahmed H. Eid, Mohamed N. Ahmed, Brian E. Cooper, Edward E. Rippetoe
IEEE Trans. Image Process.4
2008 EP printer jitter characterization using 2D Gabor filter and spectral analysis
abstract
Electrophotographic (EP) printer banding and jitter defects are main sources of print quality degradation. Traditionally, the characterization of these defects relies mainly on the assumption that the defect has either horizontal or vertical orientation to permit the simple ID analysis of the defect profile. However, this assumption can easily be violated if a small amount of printer or scanner skew is introduced to the analyzed images. In some cases the defect can inherently be neither vertical nor horizontal. Unless the defect orientation has been accurately detected before analysis, the ID-based approaches could bias the estimation of the defect severity. In this paper, we present an approach to characterize the skewed jitter defects of unrestricted orientation using 2D-based analysis of Gabor pre-filtering and spectral analysis. Our experimental results show that the proposed approach provides an objective measure that quantifies the EP jitter defect, and correlates to the subjective assessment of print quality experts with a 0.96 correlation coefficient.
Ahmed H. Eid, Mohamed N. Ahmed, Edward E. Rippetoe
ICIP3