Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yongfang Zhu

dblp:15/6939 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Biometric security · 74% Digital forensics and information hiding · 26%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Biometric security › fingerprint recognition
fingerprint individuality
0.112007
Statistical Models for Assessing the Individuality of Fingerprints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2007
Biometric security
fingerprint recognition
0.112007
Statistical Models for Assessing the Individuality of Fingerprints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2007
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital forensics
forensic analysis
0.112007
Statistical Models for Assessing the Individuality of Fingerprints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2007
Biometric security
biometric authentication
0.112006
Validating a Biometric Authentication System: Sample Size Requirements · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › mixture model
finite mixture models
0.012007
Statistical Models for Assessing the Individuality of Fingerprints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2007
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model
0.012007
Statistical Models for Assessing the Individuality of Fingerprints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random correspondence probability · 0.1finite mixture models · 0.1multivariate copula model · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Statistical Models for Assessing the Individuality of Fingerprints
abstract
Following the Daubert ruling in 1993, forensic evidence based on fingerprints was first challenged in the 1999 case of the U.S. versus Byron C. Mitchell and, subsequently, in 20 other cases involving fingerprint evidence. The main concern with the admissibility of fingerprint evidence is the problem of individualization, namely, that the fundamental premise for asserting the uniqueness of fingerprints has not been objectively tested and matching error rates are unknown. In order to assess the error rates, we require quantifying the variability of fingerprint features, namely, minutiae in the target population. A family of finite mixture models has been developed in this paper to represent the distribution of minutiae in fingerprint images, including minutiae clustering tendencies and dependencies in different regions of the fingerprint image domain. A mathematical model that computes the probability of a random correspondence (PRC) is derived based on the mixture models. A PRC of 2.25$\,\times 10^{-6}$corresponding to 12 minutiae matches was computed for the NIST4 Special Database, when the numbers of query and template minutiae both equal 46. This is also the estimate of the PRC for a target population with a similar composition as that of NIST4.
Yongfang Zhu, Sarat C. Dass, Anil K. Jain 0001
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.1
2006 Validating a Biometric Authentication System: Sample Size Requirements
abstract
Authentication systems based on biometric features (e.g., fingerprint impressions, iris scans, human face images, etc.) are increasingly gaining widespread use and popularity. Often, vendors and owners of these commercial biometric systems claim impressive performance that is estimated based on some proprietary data. In such situations, there is a need to independently validate the claimed performance levels. System performance is typically evaluated by collecting biometric templates from n different subjects, and for convenience, acquiring multiple instances of the biometric for each of the n subjects. Very little work has been done in 1) constructing confidence regions based on the ROC curve for validating the claimed performance levels and 2) determining the required number of biometric samples needed to establish confidence regions of prespecified width for the ROC curve. To simplify the analysis that address these two problems, several previous studies have assumed that multiple acquisitions of the biometric entity are statistically independent. This assumption is too restrictive and is generally not valid. We have developed a validation technique based on multivariate copula models for correlated biometric acquisitions. Based on the same model, we also determine the minimum number of samples required to achieve confidence bands of desired width for the ROC curve. We illustrate the estimation of the confidence bands as well as the required number of biometric samples using a fingerprint matching system that is applied on samples collected from a small population.
Sarat C. Dass, Yongfang Zhu, Anil K. Jain 0001
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2