Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Botao Yu
dblp:150/2596
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-author · 7 since 2021Computer networks · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Vision and language · 52% Language models and text generation · 17% Information extraction and text analysis · 15% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mind2Web 2: Evaluating Agentic Search with Agent-as-a-Judge · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › multimodal large language model
multimodal large language model evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark · ACL (1) 2025 |
Information retrieval
agentic search |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mind2Web 2: Evaluating Agentic Search with Agent-as-a-Judge · NeurIPS 2025 |
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mind2Web 2: Evaluating Agentic Search with Agent-as-a-Judge · NeurIPS 2025 |
Information retrieval
search engines |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mind2Web 2: Evaluating Agentic Search with Agent-as-a-Judge · NeurIPS 2025 |
Information retrieval
web search |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mind2Web 2: Evaluating Agentic Search with Agent-as-a-Judge · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal benchmark |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MMMU: A Massive Multi-Discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MMMU: A Massive Multi-Discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Museformer: Transformer with Fine- and Coarse-Grained Attention for Music Generation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › music generation
symbolic music generation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Museformer: Transformer with Fine- and Coarse-Grained Attention for Music Generation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
distant supervision |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Knowing False Negatives: An Adversarial Training Method for Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Knowing False Negatives: An Adversarial Training Method for Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
code generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific Discovery · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | MMMU: A Massive Multi-Discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI · CVPR 2024 |
Audio and music processing
music generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Museformer: Transformer with Fine- and Coarse-Grained Attention for Music Generation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tree-structured rubric design · 1.7self-debug · 1.7large language model · 1.7direct prompting · 1.7LLM-as-a-judge · 1.7transformer · 1.1benchmarking · 0.9multimodal evaluation · 0.8memory mechanism · 0.5adversarial training · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding BenchmarkabstractXiang Yue, Tianyu Zheng, Yuansheng Ni, Yubo Wang, Kai Zhang, Shengbang Tong, Yuxuan Sun, Botao Yu, Ge Zhang, Huan Sun, Yu Su, Wenhu Chen, Graham Neubig. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Xiang Yue, Tianyu Zheng, Yuansheng Ni, Yubo Wang 0019, Kai Zhang 0033, Shengbang Tong, Yuxuan Sun 0002, Botao Yu, Ge Zhang 0009, Huan Sun 0001, Yu Su 0001, Wenhu Chen, Graham Neubig |
ACL (1) | 8 |
| 2025 | AutoSDT: Scaling Data-Driven Discovery Tasks Toward Open Co-ScientistsabstractYifei Li, Hanane Nour Moussa, Ziru Chen, Shijie Chen, Botao Yu, Mingyi Xue, Benjamin Burns, Tzu-Yao Chiu, Vishal Dey, Zitong Lu, Chen Wei, Qianheng Zhang, Tianyu Zhang, Song Gao, Xuhui Huang, Xia Ning, Nesreen K. Ahmed, Ali Payani, Huan Sun. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025. Yifei Li 0005, Hanane Nour Moussa, Ziru Chen, Botao Yu, Mingyi Xue 0001, Benjamin Burns, Tzu-Yao Chiu, Vishal Dey, Zitong Lu, Qianheng Zhang, Song Gao 0001, Xuhui Huang, Xia Ning, Nesreen K. Ahmed, Ali Payani, Huan Sun 0001 |
EMNLP | 5 |
| 2025 | ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific DiscoveryabstractThe advancements of language language models (LLMs) have piqued growing interest in developing LLM-based language agents to automate scientific discovery end-to-end, which has sparked both excitement and skepticism about the true capabilities of such agents. In this work, we argue that for an agent to fully automate scientific discovery, it must be able to complete all essential tasks in the workflow. Thus, we call for rigorous assessment of agents on individual tasks in a scientific workflow before making bold claims on end-to-end automation. To this end, we present ScienceAgentBench, a new benchmark for evaluating language agents for data-driven scientific discovery. To ensure the scientific authenticity and real-world relevance of our benchmark, we extract 102 tasks from 44 peer-reviewed publications in four disciplines and engage nine subject matter experts to validate them. We unify the target output for every task to a self-contained Python program file and employ an array of evaluation metrics to examine the generated programs, execution results, and costs. Each task goes through multiple rounds of manual validation by annotators and subject matter experts to ensure its annotation quality and scientific plausibility. We also propose two effective strategies to mitigate data contamination concerns. Using our benchmark, we evaluate five open-weight and proprietary LLMs, each with three frameworks: direct prompting, OpenHands, and self-debug. Given three attempts for each task, the best-performing agent can only solve 32.4% of the tasks independently and 34.3% with expert-provided knowledge. These results underscore the limited capacities of current language agents in generating code for data-driven discovery, let alone end-to-end automation for scientific research. Ziru Chen, Yuting Ning, Qianheng Zhang, Boshi Wang, Botao Yu, Yifei Li 0005, Zeyi Liao, Zitong Lu, Vishal Dey, Mingyi Xue 0001, Frazier N. Baker, Benjamin Burns, Daniel Adu-Ampratwum, Xuhui Huang, Xia Ning, Song Gao 0001, Yu Su 0001, Huan Sun 0001 |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2025 | Mind2Web 2: Evaluating Agentic Search with Agent-as-a-JudgeabstractAgentic search such as Deep Research systems-where agents autonomously browse the web, synthesize information, and return comprehensive citation-backed answers-represents a major shift in how users interact with web-scale information. While promising greater efficiency and cognitive offloading, the growing complexity and open-endedness of agentic search have outpaced existing evaluation benchmarks and methodologies, which largely assume short search horizons and static answers. In this paper, we introduce Mind2Web 2, a benchmark of 130 realistic, high-quality, and long-horizon tasks that require real-time web browsing and extensive information synthesis, constructed with over 1000 hours of human labor. To address the challenge of evaluating time-varying and complex answers, we propose a novel Agent-as-a-Judge framework. Our method constructs task-specific judge agents based on a tree-structured rubric design to automatically assess both answer correctness and source attribution. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of ten frontier agentic search systems and human performance, along with a detailed error analysis to draw insights for future development. The best-performing system, OpenAI Deep Research, can already achieve 50-70% of human performance while spending half the time, highlighting its great potential. Altogether, Mind2Web 2 provides a rigorous foundation for developing and benchmarking the next generation of agentic search systems. Boyu Gou, Zanming Huang, Yuting Ning, Yu Gu 0016, Michael Lin, Weijian Qi, Andrei Kopanev, Botao Yu, Bernal Jimenez Gutierrez, Yiheng Shu, Chan Hee Song, Jiaman Wu, Hanane Nour Moussa, Tianshu Zhang 0001, Yifei Li 0005, Tianci Xue, Zeyi Liao, Kai Zhang 0033, Boyuan Zheng 0001, Zhaowei Cai, Viktor Rozgic, Morteza Ziyadi, Huan Sun 0001, Yu Su 0001 |
NeurIPS | 8 |
| 2024 | MMMU: A Massive Multi-Discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIabstractWe introduce MMMU: a new benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on massive multi-discipline tasks demanding college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. MMMU includes 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and text-books, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Busi-ness, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering. These questions span 30 subjects and 183 subfields, comprising 30 highly het-erogeneous image types, such as charts, diagrams, maps, tables, music sheets, and chemical structures. Unlike existing benchmarks, MMMU focuses on advanced perception and reasoning with domain-specific knowledge, challenging models to perform tasks akin to those faced by experts. The evaluation of 28 open-source LMMs as well as the propri-etary GPT-4V(ision) and Gemini highlights the substantial challenges posed by MMMU. Even the advanced GPT-4V and Gemini Ultra only achieve accuracies of 56% and 59% respectively, indicating significant room for improvement. We believe MMMU will stimulate the community to build next-generation multimodal foundation models towards expert artificial general intelligence. Xiang Yue, Yuansheng Ni, Tianyu Zheng, Kai Zhang 0033, Ruoqi Liu, Ge Zhang 0009, Samuel Stevens 0001, Dongfu Jiang, Weiming Ren, Yuxuan Sun 0002, Cong Wei 0001, Botao Yu, Ruibin Yuan, Renliang Sun, Boyuan Zheng 0001, Zhenzhu Yang, Wenhao Huang 0001, Huan Sun 0001, Yu Su 0001, Wenhu Chen |
CVPR | 12 |
| 2022 | Museformer: Transformer with Fine- and Coarse-Grained Attention for Music GenerationabstractSymbolic music generation aims to generate music scores automatically. A recent trend is to use Transformer or its variants in music generation, which is, however, suboptimal, because the full attention cannot efficiently model the typically long music sequences (e.g., over 10,000 tokens), and the existing models have shortcomings in generating musical repetition structures. In this paper, we propose Museformer, a Transformer with a novel fine- and coarse-grained attention for music generation. Specifically, with the fine-grained attention, a token of a specific bar directly attends to all the tokens of the bars that are most relevant to music structures (e.g., the previous 1st, 2nd, 4th and 8th bars, selected via similarity statistics); with the coarse-grained attention, a token only attends to the summarization of the other bars rather than each token of them so as to reduce the computational cost. The advantages are two-fold. First, it can capture both music structure-related correlations via the fine-grained attention, and other contextual information via the coarse-grained attention. Second, it is efficient and can model over 3X longer music sequences compared to its full-attention counterpart. Both objective and subjective experimental results demonstrate its ability to generate long music sequences with high quality and better structures. Botao Yu, Peiling Lu, Rui Wang 0028, Xu Tan 0003, Wei Ye 0004, Shikun Zhang, Tao Qin 0001, Tie-Yan Liu |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Knowing False Negatives: An Adversarial Training Method for Distantly Supervised Relation ExtractionabstractDistantly supervised relation extraction (RE)automatically aligns unstructured text with relation instances in a knowledge base (KB).Due to the incompleteness of current KBs, sentences implying certain relations may be annotated as N/A instances, which causes the socalled false negative (FN) problem.Current RE methods usually overlook this problem, inducing improper biases in both training and testing procedures.To address this issue, we propose a two-stage approach.First, it finds out possible FN samples by heuristically leveraging the memory mechanism of deep neural networks.Then, it aligns those unlabeled data with the training data into a unified feature space by adversarial training to assign pseudo labels and further utilize the information contained in them.Experiments on two wildlyused benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Kailong Hao, Botao Yu, Wei Hu 0007 |
EMNLP (1) | 2 |
| 2019 | Collaborative Sleep Mechanism between Cross-domain Nodes in FiWi network based on load balancing and QoS awareness
Xujing Peng, Siya Xu, Shao-Yong Guo 0001, Xuesong Qiu 0001, Botao Yu |
IM | 6 |