Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Graeme McPhillips

dblp:150/3283 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Wireless sensing and localization · 61% Physical-layer communications · 30% Wireless networking · 9%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications › antenna arrays
phased array signal processing
0.212014
Phaser: enabling phased array signal processing on commodity WiFi access points · MobiCom 2014
Wireless sensing and localization
phase offset calibration
0.212014
Phaser: enabling phased array signal processing on commodity WiFi access points · MobiCom 2014
Wireless sensing and localization
wifi sensing
0.212014
Phaser: enabling phased array signal processing on commodity WiFi access points · MobiCom 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spectral analysis · 0.2phase offset correction · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Phaser: enabling phased array signal processing on commodity WiFi access points
abstract
Signal processing on antenna arrays has received much recent attention in the mobile and wireless networking research communities, with array signal processing approaches addressing the problems of human movement detection, indoor mobile device localization, and wireless network security. However, there are two important challenges inherent in the design of these systems that must be overcome if they are to be of practical use on commodity hardware. First, phase differences between the radio oscillators behind each antenna can make readings unusable, and so must be corrected in order for most techniques to yield high-fidelity results. Second, while the number of antennas on commodity access points is usually limited, most array processing increases in fidelity with more antennas. These issues work in synergistic opposition to array processing: without phase offset correction, no phase-difference array processing is possible, and with fewer antennas, automatic correction of these phase offsets becomes even more challenging. We present Phaser, a system that solves these intertwined problems to make phased array signal processing truly practical on the many WiFi access points deployed in the real world. Our experimental results on three- and five-antenna 802.11-based hardware show that 802.11 NICs can be calibrated and synchronized to a 20° median phase error, enabling inexpensive deployment of numerous phase-difference based spectral analysis techniques previously only available on costly, special-purpose hardware.
Jon Gjengset, Jie Xiong 0001, Graeme McPhillips, Kyle Jamieson
MobiCom3
2011 A wearable and flexible Bracelet computer for on-body sensing
abstract
Small-size, light-weight, flexible and programmable, yet low-cost sensor node is one of the keys to enable Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) research and a wide range of user applications. In this paper, the Bracelet computer is presented. The system is designed to be flexible and wearable that it supports a range of daughter boards of user's choice, and provides different ways for the boards to be connected to the main processor board. Despite a range of features, the monetary cost of the system is kept low. An application of the system - which uses the same wireless board as the Bracelet computer for localising a running athlete - is presented in this paper to demonstrate the applicability of the system. The localisation results show that the system achieves an average positional error of 28.945cm.
Lawrence Cheng, Lamling Venus Shum, Gregor Kuntze, Graeme McPhillips, Alan Wilson 0003, Stephen Hailes, David G. Kerwin, G. Kerwin
CCNC4