Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adam Sealfon

dblp:150/6253 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
14ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-3860-223XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 7 · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 3 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
7 papers
Privacy and data protection · 69% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 16% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 14%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 57% Algorithms and data structures · 34% Distributed computing theory · 9%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 21 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
2.042024
Individualized Privacy Accounting via Subsampling with Applications in Combinatorial Optimization · ICML 2024
On Computing Pairwise Statistics with Local Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2023
Efficiently Estimating Erdos-Renyi Graphs with Node Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2019
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
privacy accounting
0.812024
Individualized Privacy Accounting via Subsampling with Applications in Combinatorial Optimization · ICML 2024
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private optimization
private combinatorial optimization
0.812024
Individualized Privacy Accounting via Subsampling with Applications in Combinatorial Optimization · ICML 2024
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
local differential privacy
0.712023
On Computing Pairwise Statistics with Local Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2023
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems › zero-knowledge proofs
non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs
0.512021
Toward Non-interactive Zero-Knowledge Proofs for NP from LWE · J. Cryptol. 2021
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
zero-knowledge proofs
0.512021
Toward Non-interactive Zero-Knowledge Proofs for NP from LWE · J. Cryptol. 2021
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
digital signatures
0.412019
It Wasn't Me! - Repudiability and Claimability of Ring Signatures · CRYPTO (3) 2019
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private graph algorithms
node-differential privacy
0.412019
Efficiently Estimating Erdos-Renyi Graphs with Node Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2019
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures
ring signature
0.412019
It Wasn't Me! - Repudiability and Claimability of Ring Signatures · CRYPTO (3) 2019
Graph algorithms and graph theory › random graphs
erdős–rényi random graph
0.412019
Efficiently Estimating Erdos-Renyi Graphs with Node Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2019
Algorithms and data structures › sublinear algorithms › sublinear-time algorithms
graph parameter estimation
0.412019
Efficiently Estimating Erdos-Renyi Graphs with Node Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2019
Distributed systems
distributed coordination
0.312018
Population Stability: Regulating Size in the Presence of an Adversary · PODC 2018
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
oblivious transfer
0.212016
Network Oblivious Transfer · CRYPTO (2) 2016
Graph algorithms and graph theory
shortest path
0.212016
Shortest Paths and Distances with Differential Privacy · PODS 2016
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private query answering
heavy hitters
0.212024
Individualized Privacy Accounting via Subsampling with Applications in Combinatorial Optimization · ICML 2024
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving data management
private streaming
0.212024
Individualized Privacy Accounting via Subsampling with Applications in Combinatorial Optimization · ICML 2024
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private query answering
linear queries
0.212023
On Computing Pairwise Statistics with Local Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2023
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography
lattice-based cryptography
0.112021
Toward Non-interactive Zero-Knowledge Proofs for NP from LWE · J. Cryptol. 2021
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
post-quantum cryptography
0.112021
Toward Non-interactive Zero-Knowledge Proofs for NP from LWE · J. Cryptol. 2021
Distributed computing theory
adversarial models
0.112018
Population Stability: Regulating Size in the Presence of an Adversary · PODC 2018
Network security › secure communication
secure communication protocol
0.112016
Network Oblivious Transfer · CRYPTO (2) 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

subsampling · 0.8edge-density estimation · 0.8statistical estimation · 0.7learning with errors · 0.5differential privacy · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Scan, Shuffle, Rescan: Two-Prover Election Audits With Untrusted Scanners
Douglas W. Jones, Sunoo Park, Ronald L. Rivest, Adam Sealfon
FC (2)4
2024 Individualized Privacy Accounting via Subsampling with Applications in Combinatorial Optimization
abstract
In this work, we give a new technique for analyzing individualized privacy accounting via the following simple observation: if an algorithm is one-sided add-DP, then its subsampled variant satisfies two-sided DP. From this, we obtain several improved algorithms for private combinatorial optimization problems, including decomposable submodular maximization and set cover. Our error guarantees are asymptotically tight and our algorithm satisfies pure-DP while previously known algorithms (Gupta et al., 2010; Chaturvedi et al., 2021) are approximate-DP. We also show an application of our technique beyond combinatorial optimization by giving a pure-DP algorithm for the shifting heavy hitter problem in a stream; previously, only an approximate-DP algorithm was known (Kaplan et al., 2021; Cohen & Lyu, 2023).
Badih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar 0001, Pasin Manurangsi, Adam Sealfon
ICML5
2024 Summary Reports Optimization in the Privacy Sandbox Attribution Reporting API
abstract
The Privacy Sandbox Attribution Reporting API has been recently deployed by Google Chrome to support the basic advertising functionality of attribution reporting (aka conversion measurement) after deprecation of third-party cookies. The API implements a collection of privacy-enhancing guardrails including contribution bounding and noise injection. It also offers flexibility for the analyst to allocate the contribution budget. In this work, we present algorithms for optimizing the allocation of the contribution budget for summary reports from the Attribution Reporting API. We develop a synthetic data model that we find to accurately capture real-world conversion data, and extensively evaluate our method on two real-world datasets and two synthetic datasets. We show that optimizing the parameters that can be set by the analyst can significantly improve the utility achieved by querying the API while satisfying the same privacy bounds.
Hidayet Aksu, Badih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar 0001, Pasin Manurangsi, Adam Sealfon, Avinash V. Varadarajan
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol.6
2023 On Computing Pairwise Statistics with Local Differential Privacy
abstract
We study the problem of computing pairwise statistics, i.e., ones of the form $\binom{n}{2}^{-1} \sum_{i \ne j} f(x_i, x_j)$, where $x_i$ denotes the input to the $i$th user, with differential privacy (DP) in the local model. This formulation captures important metrics such as Kendall's $\tau$ coefficient, Area Under Curve, Gini's mean difference, Gini's entropy, etc. We give several novel and generic algorithms for the problem, leveraging techniques from DP algorithms for linear queries.
Badih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar 0001, Pasin Manurangsi, Adam Sealfon
NeurIPS5
2023 Synchronizable Fair Exchange
abstract
Fitzi, Garay, Maurer, and Ostrovsky (J. Cryptology 2005) showed that in the presence of a dishonest majority, no primitive of cardinality $$n - 1$$ is complete for realizing an arbitrary n-party functionality with guaranteed output delivery. In this work, we introduce a new 2-party primitive $$\mathcal {F}_{\textsf{SyX}}$$ (“synchronizable fair exchange”) and show that it is complete for realizing any n-party functionality with fairness in a setting where all parties are pairwise connected by instances of $$\mathcal {F}_{\textsf{SyX}}$$ . In the $$\mathcal {F}_{\textsf{SyX}}$$ -hybrid model, the two parties load $$\mathcal {F}_{\textsf{SyX}}$$ with some input, and following this, either party can trigger $$\mathcal {F}_{\textsf{SyX}}$$ with a “witness” at a later time to receive the output from $$\mathcal {F}_{\textsf{SyX}}$$ . Crucially the other party also receives output from $$\mathcal {F}_{\textsf{SyX}}$$ when $$\mathcal {F}_{\textsf{SyX}}$$ is triggered. The trigger witnesses allow us to synchronize the trigger phases of multiple instances of $$\mathcal {F}_{\textsf{SyX}}$$ , thereby aiding in the design of fair multiparty protocols. Additionally, a pair of parties may reuse a single a priori loaded instance of $$\mathcal {F}_{\textsf{SyX}}$$ in any number of multiparty protocols (involving different sets of parties). (The authors grant IACR a non-exclusive and irrevocable license to distribute the article under the https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ ), (This work was done in part while all the authors were at MIT).
Ranjit Kumaresan, Srinivasan Raghuraman, Adam Sealfon
TCC (1)3
2021 Toward Non-interactive Zero-Knowledge Proofs for NP from LWE
Ron Rothblum, Adam Sealfon, Katerina Sotiraki
J. Cryptol.2
2020 Batch Verification for Statistical Zero Knowledge Proofs
Inbar Kaslasi, Guy N. Rothblum, Ron Rothblum, Adam Sealfon, Prashant Nalini Vasudevan
TCC (2)4
2019 It Wasn't Me! - Repudiability and Claimability of Ring Signatures
Sunoo Park, Adam Sealfon
CRYPTO (3)2
2019 Efficiently Estimating Erdos-Renyi Graphs with Node Differential Privacy
abstract
We give a simple, computationally efficient, and node-differentially-private algorithm for estimating the parameter of an Erdos-Renyi graph---that is, estimating p in a G(n,p)---with near-optimal accuracy. Our algorithm nearly matches the information-theoretically optimal exponential-time algorithm for the same problem due to Borgs et al. (FOCS 2018). More generally, we give an optimal, computationally efficient, private algorithm for estimating the edge-density of any graph whose degree distribution is concentrated in a small interval.
Jonathan R. Ullman, Adam Sealfon
NeurIPS2
2018 Population Stability: Regulating Size in the Presence of an Adversary
Shafi Goldwasser, Rafail Ostrovsky, Alessandra Scafuro, Adam Sealfon
PODC4
2016 Network Oblivious Transfer
Ranjit Kumaresan, Srinivasan Raghuraman, Adam Sealfon
CRYPTO (2)3
2016 Shortest Paths and Distances with Differential Privacy
abstract
We introduce a model for differentially private analysis of weighted graphs in which the graph topology (υ,ε) is assumed to be public and the private information consists only of the edge weights ω : ε → R+. This can express hiding congestion patterns in a known system of roads. Differential privacy requires that the output of an algorithm provides little advantage, measured by privacy parameters ε and δ, for distinguishing between neighboring inputs, which are thought of as inputs that differ on the contribution of one individual. In our model, two weight functions w,w' are considered to be neighboring if they have l1 distance at most one.
Adam Sealfon
PODS1
2015 Fault tolerant additive and (μ, α)-spanners
Gilad Braunschvig, Shiri Chechik, David Peleg, Adam Sealfon
Theor. Comput. Sci.4
2014 Agreement in Partitioned Dynamic Networks
Adam Sealfon, Katerina Sotiraki
DISC1