Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chad Van De Wiele

dblp:151/0157 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 87% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › social media
people-nearby applications
0.212014
Breaking boundaries: the uses & gratifications of grindr · UbiComp 2014
Collaborative and social computing › online communities
social media communities
0.212014
Breaking boundaries: the uses & gratifications of grindr · UbiComp 2014
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
location-based services
0.112014
Breaking boundaries: the uses & gratifications of grindr · UbiComp 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

uses and gratifications · 0.2factor analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Breaking boundaries: the uses & gratifications of grindr
abstract
"People-nearby applications" (PNAs) are a form of ubiquitous computing that connect users based on their physical location data. One example is Grindr, a popular PNA that facilitates connections among gay and bisexual men. Adopting a uses and gratifications approach, we conducted two studies. In study one, 63 users reported motivations for Grindr use through open-ended descriptions. In study two, those descriptions were coded into 26 items that were completed by 525 Grindr users. Factor analysis revealed six uses and gratifications: social inclusion, sex, friendship, entertainment, romantic relationships, and location-based search. Two additional analyses examine (1) the effects of geographic location (e.g., urban vs. suburban/rural) on men's use of Grindr and (2) how Grindr use is related to self-disclosure of information. Results highlight how the mixed-mode nature of PNA technology may change the boundaries of online and offline space, and how gay and bisexual men navigate physical environments.
Chad Van De Wiele, Stephanie Tom Tong
UbiComp1