Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kristjan Eldjarn Hjorleifsson

dblp:151/8872 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-7851-1818ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 25% Segmentation and scene understanding · 25% Efficient and distributed learning · 25%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › multimedia feature representation
concept embedding
0.712023
Learning to Taste: A Multimodal Wine Dataset · NeurIPS 2023
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › multimodal learning
multimodal embedding
0.712023
Learning to Taste: A Multimodal Wine Dataset · NeurIPS 2023
Data mining
multimodal data analysis
0.212023
Learning to Taste: A Multimodal Wine Dataset · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.212014
Active Annotation Translation · CVPR 2014
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image annotation
0.212014
Active Annotation Translation · CVPR 2014
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › part parsing
part labeling
0.212014
Active Annotation Translation · CVPR 2014
Human-AI interaction › human-in-the-loop
human-in-the-loop annotation
0.112014
Active Annotation Translation · CVPR 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine similarity kernels · 1.3human similarity judgments · 1.3structured prediction · 0.4incremental learning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Learning to Taste: A Multimodal Wine Dataset
abstract
We present WineSensed, a large multimodal wine dataset for studying the relations between visual perception, language, and flavor. The dataset encompasses 897k images of wine labels and 824k reviews of wines curated from the Vivino platform. It has over 350k unique vintages, annotated with year, region, rating, alcohol percentage, price, and grape composition. We obtained fine-grained flavor annotations on a subset by conducting a wine-tasting experiment with 256 participants who were asked to rank wines based on their similarity in flavor, resulting in more than 5k pairwise flavor distances. We propose a low-dimensional concept embedding algorithm that combines human experience with automatic machine similarity kernels. We demonstrate that this shared concept embedding space improves upon separate embedding spaces for coarse flavor classification (alcohol percentage, country, grape, price, rating) and representing human perception of flavor.
Thoranna Bender, Simon Møe Sørensen, Alireza Kashani, Kristjan Eldjarn Hjorleifsson, Grethe Hyldig, Søren Hauberg, Serge J. Belongie, Frederik Warburg
NeurIPS4
2014 Active Annotation Translation
abstract
We introduce a general framework for quickly annotating an image dataset when previous annotations exist. The new annotations (e.g. part locations) may be quite different from the old annotations (e.g. segmentations). Human annotators may be thought of as helping translate the old annotations into the new ones. As annotators label images, our algorithm incrementally learns a translator from source to target labels as well as a computer-vision-based structured predictor. These two components are combined to form an improved prediction system which accelerates the annotators' work through a smart GUI. We show how the method can be applied to translate between a wide variety of annotation types, including bounding boxes, segmentations, 2D and 3D part-based systems, and class and attribute labels. The proposed system will be a useful tool toward exploring new types of representations beyond simple bounding boxes, object segmentations, and class labels, and toward finding new ways to exploit existing large datasets with traditional types of annotations like SUN [36], Image Net [11], and Pascal VOC [12]. Experiments on the CUB-200-2011 and H3D datasets demonstrate 1) our method accelerates collection of part annotations by a factor of 3-20 compared to manual labeling, 2) our system can be used effectively in a scheme where definitions of part, attribute, or action vocabularies are evolved interactively without relabeling the entire dataset, and 3) toward collecting pose annotations, segmentations are more useful than bounding boxes, and part-level annotations are more effective than segmentations.
Steve Branson, Kristjan Eldjarn Hjorleifsson, Pietro Perona
CVPR2