Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ewa Kristiansen

dblp:151/9286 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0002-1955-6805ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 50% Motion planning and robot control · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
assembly
0.212014
Autonomous optimization of fine motions for robotic assembly · ICRA 2014
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › manipulation planning
fine motion planning
0.212014
Autonomous optimization of fine motions for robotic assembly · ICRA 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

support vector machine · 0.2principal component analysis · 0.2interval estimation optimization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Autonomous optimization of fine motions for robotic assembly
abstract
In the past, robotic assembly has required rigid fixturing and special purpose robotic tools for every assembly component. Unfortunately, rigid fixtures and special purpose robotic tools often have to be customized for varying geometries. Alternatively, it is possible to operate in a semi-structured environment, defined by the use of softer fixtures (e.g. pickup bin) and softer robotic tools (e.g. suction cups or compliant pads) that can be used for many assembly applications without modification, but they demand specific motion plans that can tolerate greater positional uncertainty. We have developed a system that supports autonomous generation of parameterized fine motion plans for assembly that are robust under positional uncertainty and compliance introduced by the use of a suction cup instead of a gripper. To accomplish this a classifier is trained, implemented and tested for performance in the semi-structured environment for distinguishing between a failed or successful assembly. The trained classifier is then integrated with the entire system and many robot-attended experiments are performed that vary the fine motion parameters, and optimize them for successful outcomes using an Interval Estimation optimization algorithm. An approach to machine learning based on Support Vector Machines and Principal Component Analysis is used to make the optimization autonomous. We achieved a 99.7% classification accuracy with the trained classifier and by running repeated robot-attended experiments with artificial positional uncertainty and optimizing fine motion parameters, we were able to achieve a 38% improvement compared to fine motion plans with initial best guess parameters.
Emil Krabbe, Ewa Kristiansen, Lasse Hansen, David A. Bourne
ICRA2