Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arne Sieverling

dblp:151/9452 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0002-2073-0938ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 50% Robot manipulation · 39% Reinforcement learning · 8%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.422015
Incremental, sensor-based motion generation for mobile manipulators in unknown, dynamic environments · ICRA 2015
Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Sampling-Based Motion Planning · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2014
Robotics › Robot manipulation
mobile manipulation
0.432017
Incremental, sensor-based motion generation for mobile manipulators in unknown, dynamic environments · ICRA 2015
Lessons from the Amazon Picking Challenge: Four Aspects of Building Robotic Systems · IJCAI 2017
Sensor-based, task-constrained motion generation under uncertainty · ICRA 2014
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping › grasping in clutter
bin picking
0.312017
Lessons from the Amazon Picking Challenge: Four Aspects of Building Robotic Systems · IJCAI 2017
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping
0.312017
Lessons from the Amazon Picking Challenge: Four Aspects of Building Robotic Systems · IJCAI 2017
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › whole-body control
whole-body motion generation
0.212015
Incremental, sensor-based motion generation for mobile manipulators in unknown, dynamic environments · ICRA 2015
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration-exploitation tradeoff
0.212014
Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Sampling-Based Motion Planning · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2014
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
motion planning under uncertainty
0.212014
Sensor-based, task-constrained motion generation under uncertainty · ICRA 2014
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
sampling-based motion planning
0.212014
Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Sampling-Based Motion Planning · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2014
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › constrained motion planning
task-constrained motion planning
0.212014
Sensor-based, task-constrained motion generation under uncertainty · ICRA 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sensor-based planning · 0.2local plan adaptation · 0.2exploring/exploiting tree algorithm · 0.2expected shortest path planning · 0.2elastic roadmap planning · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Contingent Contact-Based Motion Planning
abstract
A robot with contact sensing capability can reduce uncertainty relative to the environment by deliberately moving into contact and matching the resulting contact measurement to different possible states in the world. We present a manipulation planner that finds and sequences these actions by reasoning explicitly about the uncertainty over the robot's state. The planner incrementally constructs a policy that covers all possible contact states during a manipulation and finds contingencies for each of them. In contrast to conformant planners (without contingencies), the planned contingent policies are more robust. We demonstrate this in simulated and real-world manipulation experiments. In contrast to POMDP-based planners, we show that our planner can be directly applied to high-dimensional configuration spaces.
Elod Páll, Arne Sieverling, Oliver Brock
IROS2
2017 Lessons from the Amazon Picking Challenge: Four Aspects of Building Robotic Systems
abstract
We describe the winning entry to the Amazon Picking Challenge 2015. From the experience of building this system and competing, we derive several conclusions: (1) We suggest to characterize robotic system building along four key aspects, each of them spanning a spectrum of solutions - modularity vs. integration, generality vs. assumptions, computation vs. embodiment, and planning vs. feedback. (2) To understand which region of each spectrum most adequately addresses which robotic problem, we must explore the full spectrum of possible approaches. (3) For manipulation problems in unstructured environments, certain regions of each spectrum match the problem most adequately, and should be exploited further. This is supported by the fact that our solution deviated from the majority of the other challenge entries along each of the spectra. This is an abridged version of a conference publication.
Clemens Eppner, Sebastian Höfer, Rico Jonschkowski, Roberto Martin Martin, Arne Sieverling, Vincent Wall, Oliver Brock
IJCAI5
2017 Interleaving motion in contact and in free space for planning under uncertainty
abstract
In this paper we present a planner that interleaves free-space motion with motion in contact to reduce uncertainty. The planner finds such motions by growing a search tree in the combined space of collision-free and contact configurations. The planner reasons efficiently about the accumulated uncertainty by factoring the state in a belief over configuration and a fully observable contact state. We show the uncertainty-reducing capabilities of the planner on manipulation benchmark from the POMDP literature. The planner scales up to more complex problems like manipulation under uncertainty in seven-dimensional configuration space. We validate our planner in simulation and on a real robot.
Arne Sieverling, Clemens Eppner, Felix Wolff, Oliver Brock
IROS1
2015 Incremental, sensor-based motion generation for mobile manipulators in unknown, dynamic environments
abstract
We present an incremental method for motion generation in environments with unpredictably moving and initially unknown obstacles. The key to the method is its incremental nature: it locally augments and adapts global motion plans in response to changes in the environment, even if they significantly change the connectivity of the world. The restriction to local changes to a global plan results from the fact that in mobile manipulation, robots can ultimately only rely on their on-board sensors to perceive changes in the world. The proposed method addresses three sub-problems of motion generation with three algorithmic components. The first component reactively adapts plans in response to small, continuous changes. The second augments the plan locally in response to connectivity changes. And the third extracts a global, goal-directed motion from the representation maintained by the first two components. In an experimental evaluation of this method, we show a real-world mobile manipulator executing a whole-body motion task in an initially unknown environment, while incrementally maintaining a plan using only on-board sensors.
Peter Lehner, Arne Sieverling, Oliver Brock
ICRA2
2014 Sensor-based, task-constrained motion generation under uncertainty
abstract
Mobile manipulation targets applications in dynamic and unstructured environments. Motion generation methods suitable for these applications must account for end-effector task constraints, must reason about environment uncertainty, i.e. the fact that the exact state of the dynamic environment cannot be known to the robot, and should do so only using their on-board sensors. We present the Expected-Shortest-Path Elastic Roadmap (ESPER) planner as a motion generation method suitable for mobile manipulation. It integrates task-constrained, whole-body, reactive motion generation in high-dimensional configuration space with reasoning about uncertainty. In our experiments, we generate task-consistent motion in uncertain environments on a real-world mobile manipulator only relying on on-board sensors.
Arne Sieverling, Nicolas Kuhnen, Oliver Brock
ICRA1
2014 Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Sampling-Based Motion Planning
abstract
We present the exploring/exploiting tree (EET) algorithm for motion planning. The EET planner deliberately trades probabilistic completeness for computational efficiency. This tradeoff enables the EET planner to outperform state-of-the-art sampling-based planners by up to three orders of magnitude. We show that these considerable speedups apply for a variety of challenging real-world motion planning problems. The performance improvements are achieved by leveraging work space information to continuously adjust the sampling behavior of the planner. When the available information captures the planning problem's inherent structure, the planner's sampler becomes increasingly exploitative. When the available information is less accurate, the planner automatically compensates by increasing local configuration space exploration. We show that active balancing of exploration and exploitation based on workspace information can be a key ingredient to enabling highly efficient motion planning in practical scenarios.
Markus Rickert 0001, Arne Sieverling, Oliver Brock
IEEE Trans. Robotics2