Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Efstathios Vafeias

dblp:151/9508 · also Stathis Vafeias · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Video understanding and tracking · 35% Vision and language · 30% Graph learning · 30%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.312018
Learning Conditioned Graph Structures for Interpretable Visual Question Answering · NeurIPS 2018
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering
0.312018
Learning Conditioned Graph Structures for Interpretable Visual Question Answering · NeurIPS 2018
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition
0.212014
Joint classification of actions and object state changes with a latent variable discriminative model · ICRA 2014
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action recognition
human action recognition
0.212014
Joint classification of actions and object state changes with a latent variable discriminative model · ICRA 2014
Robotics › Autonomous driving › interaction modeling
interaction reasoning
0.112014
Joint classification of actions and object state changes with a latent variable discriminative model · ICRA 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph learner module · 0.3graph convolution · 0.3latent variable conditional random field · 0.2factored representation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Learning Conditioned Graph Structures for Interpretable Visual Question Answering
abstract
Visual Question answering is a challenging problem requiring a combination of concepts from Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing. Most existing approaches use a two streams strategy, computing image and question features that are consequently merged using a variety of techniques. Nonetheless, very few rely on higher level image representations, which can capture semantic and spatial relationships. In this paper, we propose a novel graph-based approach for Visual Question Answering. Our method combines a graph learner module, which learns a question specific graph representation of the input image, with the recent concept of graph convolutions, aiming to learn image representations that capture question specific interactions. We test our approach on the VQA v2 dataset using a simple baseline architecture enhanced by the proposed graph learner module. We obtain promising results with 66.18% accuracy and demonstrate the interpretability of the proposed method. Code can be found at github.com/aimbrain/vqa-project.
Will Norcliffe-Brown, Efstathios Vafeias, Sarah Parisot
NeurIPS2
2014 Joint classification of actions and object state changes with a latent variable discriminative model
abstract
We present a technique to classify human actions that involve object manipulation. Our focus is to accurately distinguish between actions that are related in that the object's state changes define the essential differences. Our algorithm uses a latent variable conditional random field that allows for the modelling of spatio-temporal relationships between the human motion and the corresponding object state changes. Our approach involves a factored representation that better allows for the description of causal effects in the way human action causes object state changes. The utility of incorporating such structure in our model is that it enables more accurate classification of activities that could enable robots to reason about interaction, and to learn using a high level vocabulary that captures phenomena of interest. We present experiments involving the recognition of human actions, where we show that our factored representation achieves superior performance in comparison to alternate flat representations.
Efstathios Vafeias, Subramanian Ramamoorthy
ICRA1