Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tobias Straus
dblp:151/9539
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera calibration |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Calibrating and centering quasi-central catadioptric cameras · ICRA 2014 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › camera calibration
catadioptric camera calibration |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Calibrating and centering quasi-central catadioptric cameras · ICRA 2014 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › camera calibration
camera model |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Calibrating and centering quasi-central catadioptric cameras · ICRA 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
remapping · 0.2non-central camera model · 0.2localization experiments · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Calibrating and centering quasi-central catadioptric camerasabstractNon-central catadioptric models are able to cope with irregular camera setups and inaccuracies in the manufacturing process but are computationally demanding and thus not suitable for robotic applications. On the other hand, calibrating a quasi-central (almost central) system with a central model introduces errors due to a wrong relationship between the viewing ray orientations and the pixels on the image sensor. In this paper, we propose a central approximation to quasi-central catadioptric camera systems that is both accurate and efficient. We observe that the distance to points in 3D is typically large compared to deviations from the single viewpoint. Thus, we first calibrate the system using a state-of-the-art non-central camera model. Next, we show that by remapping the observations we are able to match the orientation of the viewing rays of a much simpler single viewpoint model with the true ray orientations. While our approximation is general and applicable to all quasi-central camera systems, we focus on one of the most common cases in practice: hypercatadioptric cameras. We compare our model to a variety of baselines in synthetic and real localization and motion estimation experiments. We show that by using the proposed model we are able to achieve near non-central accuracy while obtaining speed-ups of more than three orders of magnitude compared to state-of-the-art non-central models. Miriam Schönbein, Tobias Straus, Andreas Geiger 0001 |
ICRA | 2 |