Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kyle Lawson Crandall

dblp:151/9548 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Legged, aerial and field robots · 39% Multi-agent systems · 30% Motion planning and robot control · 19%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › hybrid systems
abstraction-based control
0.212016
Using abstraction for swarm control of a parent system · ICRA 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › swarm robotics
swarm control
0.212016
Using abstraction for swarm control of a parent system · ICRA 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
swarm robotics
0.212016
Using abstraction for swarm control of a parent system · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
field robotics
0.212015
UAV fall detection from a dynamic perch using Instantaneous Centers of Rotation and inertial sensing · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots › aerial physical interaction
perching
0.212015
UAV fall detection from a dynamic perch using Instantaneous Centers of Rotation and inertial sensing · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots
unmanned aerial vehicle
0.212015
UAV fall detection from a dynamic perch using Instantaneous Centers of Rotation and inertial sensing · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot manipulation
cooperative manipulation
0.112016
Using abstraction for swarm control of a parent system · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.112016
Using abstraction for swarm control of a parent system · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot perception
inertial sensing
0.112015
UAV fall detection from a dynamic perch using Instantaneous Centers of Rotation and inertial sensing · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization
0.112015
UAV fall detection from a dynamic perch using Instantaneous Centers of Rotation and inertial sensing · ICRA 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

controller design · 0.2abstraction · 0.2instantaneous center of rotation · 0.2accelerometer integration · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Using abstraction for swarm control of a parent system
abstract
Swarms of robots have many uses, from exploring an area in a parallel manner to manipulating objects, both on the ground and in the air. In this paper, we consider a class of swarms in which robots within the swarm work together to manipulate a parent system with its own dynamics. Using the process of abstraction, we find a set of variables that represent key elements of the swarm such as its mean position, the variance of the swarm's distribution, etc. Using these variables, we can generate a simplified model of how the swarm interacts with the parent system and design a controller to control the parent system through this abstract state. We show that we are able to use a swarm to regulate the parent system, track a step input, and reject step disturbances in an example problem involving a swarm of robots balancing a plane that is allowed to rotate about an axis through its center.
Kyle Lawson Crandall, Caleb Whitehead, Shuqi Dong, Adam M. Wickenheiser
ICRA1
2015 UAV fall detection from a dynamic perch using Instantaneous Centers of Rotation and inertial sensing
abstract
Much research has been done recently on getting various UAVs to perch on various surfaces, however very little research has looked at how to detect when this perch has failed, especially when the surface the UAV is perched on is moving. This paper proposes a method to detect these types of falls using the Instantaneous Center of Rotation (ICR) of the UAV. Two methods are proposed to calculate this ICR, one based on integrating accelerometers to get velocities at various points on the UAV, the other based on using the magnitude of the acceleration at these points to estimate the distance to the ICR from that point. These methods provide a way to detect a fall from a moving perch that should work with different types of perching mechanisms and perches, while requiring minimal additional hardware on the UAV.
Kyle Lawson Crandall, Mark A. Minor
ICRA1
2014 Online parameter estimation via real-time replanning of continuous Gaussian POMDPs
abstract
An accurate dynamics model of a robot is an important ingredient of many algorithms used to solve robotics problems, including motion planning, control, localization, and mapping. Models derived from first principles often contain parameters (e.g. mass, moment of inertia, arm lengths, etc.) for which values are unknown. Those which cannot be easily measured must be estimated from the observed behavior of the robot. A good approach to address this problem is to plan control policies for the robot that elicit maximal amounts of information about the parameters of the system, while still achieving other objectives specified for the robot. In case of parameters subject to drift, this must be done continuously over the lifetime of the robot if costly re-calibrations are to be avoided. In this paper, we introduce a new method that formulates the parameter estimation problem as a continuous partially-observable Markov decision process (POMDP), which plans control policies that optimally trade-off the effort spent on learning parameters and effort spent on achieving regular robot objectives (exploration vs. exploitation), and allow for online, continual parameter estimation. While POMDPs have, until recently, been mostly of theoretical interest due to their inherent complexity, we build on recent advances that allow continuous, Gaussian POMDPs to be approximately-optimally solved in near-real-time rates. We show that the computed control policies lead to improved convergence of the belief of the parameters compared to system identification approaches based on applying random controls.
Dustin J. Webb, Kyle Lawson Crandall, Jur P. van den Berg
ICRA2