Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Emil Krabbe
dblp:151/9708
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0001-8186-262XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot manipulation · 50% Motion planning and robot control · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation
assembly |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Autonomous optimization of fine motions for robotic assembly · ICRA 2014 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › manipulation planning
fine motion planning |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Autonomous optimization of fine motions for robotic assembly · ICRA 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
support vector machine · 0.2principal component analysis · 0.2interval estimation optimization · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Autonomous optimization of fine motions for robotic assemblyabstractIn the past, robotic assembly has required rigid fixturing and special purpose robotic tools for every assembly component. Unfortunately, rigid fixtures and special purpose robotic tools often have to be customized for varying geometries. Alternatively, it is possible to operate in a semi-structured environment, defined by the use of softer fixtures (e.g. pickup bin) and softer robotic tools (e.g. suction cups or compliant pads) that can be used for many assembly applications without modification, but they demand specific motion plans that can tolerate greater positional uncertainty. We have developed a system that supports autonomous generation of parameterized fine motion plans for assembly that are robust under positional uncertainty and compliance introduced by the use of a suction cup instead of a gripper. To accomplish this a classifier is trained, implemented and tested for performance in the semi-structured environment for distinguishing between a failed or successful assembly. The trained classifier is then integrated with the entire system and many robot-attended experiments are performed that vary the fine motion parameters, and optimize them for successful outcomes using an Interval Estimation optimization algorithm. An approach to machine learning based on Support Vector Machines and Principal Component Analysis is used to make the optimization autonomous. We achieved a 99.7% classification accuracy with the trained classifier and by running repeated robot-attended experiments with artificial positional uncertainty and optimizing fine motion parameters, we were able to achieve a 38% improvement compared to fine motion plans with initial best guess parameters. Emil Krabbe, Ewa Kristiansen, Lasse Hansen, David A. Bourne |
ICRA | 1 |