Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thomas Hütter

dblp:152/5500 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
5as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-7190-6825ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 8 · 3 first-author · 7 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers
Query processing and optimization · 32% Indexing and storage engines · 20% Data mining · 16%
Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 80% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 20%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Query processing and optimization
similarity join
1.222025
Extensible and Robust Evaluation of Similarity Queries · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Effective Filters and Linear Time Verification for Tree Similarity Joins · ICDE 2019
Indexing and storage engines
vector index
1.232025
JEDI: These aren't the JSON documents you're looking for? · SIGMOD Conference 2022
Effective Filters and Linear Time Verification for Tree Similarity Joins · ICDE 2019
Extensible and Robust Evaluation of Similarity Queries · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Query processing and optimization › query planning
query plan selection
0.912025
Extensible and Robust Evaluation of Similarity Queries · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Query processing and optimization
similarity query processing
0.912025
Extensible and Robust Evaluation of Similarity Queries · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Indexing and storage engines › file organization
clustered index
0.712023
FINEX: A Fast Index for Exact & Flexible Density-Based Clustering · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023
Data mining
clustering
0.712023
FINEX: A Fast Index for Exact & Flexible Density-Based Clustering · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023
Data mining › clustering
density-based clustering
0.712023
FINEX: A Fast Index for Exact & Flexible Density-Based Clustering · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.712023
Benchmarking the Utility of w-event Differential Privacy Mechanisms - When Baselines Become Mighty Competitors · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › continual release
w-event privacy
0.712023
Benchmarking the Utility of w-event Differential Privacy Mechanisms - When Baselines Become Mighty Competitors · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023
Information retrieval › similarity measure
edit distance
0.612022
JEDI: These aren't the JSON documents you're looking for? · SIGMOD Conference 2022
Data models and query languages › semistructured data
JSON
0.612022
JEDI: These aren't the JSON documents you're looking for? · SIGMOD Conference 2022
Data models and query languages
semistructured data
0.612022
JEDI: These aren't the JSON documents you're looking for? · SIGMOD Conference 2022
Information retrieval
similarity search
0.612022
JEDI: These aren't the JSON documents you're looking for? · SIGMOD Conference 2022
Spatial and temporal data management › spatial query processing
filtering-and-verification
0.412019
Effective Filters and Linear Time Verification for Tree Similarity Joins · ICDE 2019
Data mining
anomaly detection
0.212023
FINEX: A Fast Index for Exact & Flexible Density-Based Clustering · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023
Data stream processing › stream processing systems
privacy-preserving stream processing
0.212023
Benchmarking the Utility of w-event Differential Privacy Mechanisms - When Baselines Become Mighty Competitors · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.212023
Benchmarking the Utility of w-event Differential Privacy Mechanisms - When Baselines Become Mighty Competitors · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

literature survey · 2.0empirical study · 2.0sampling-based query plan selection · 0.9cost model · 0.9neighborhood computation pruning · 0.7linear-space index · 0.7upper bound filtering · 0.4tree edit distance · 0.4statistical testing · 0.3experimental cryptanalysis · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Towards Semi-Automated Data Supply Chain Management
Thomas Hütter, Manuela Geiß, Christian Lettner, Tobias Rehberger, Gerald Aigner
DEXA (1)1
2026 Evaluating Data Quality Tools: Measurement Capabilities and LLM Integration
Tobias Rehberger, Thomas Hütter, Lisa Ehrlinger, Wolfram Wöß
DEXA (1)2
2026 Dynamic time warping for classifying long-term trends in time series
Anna-Christina Glock, Klaus Chmelina, Johannes Fürnkranz, Thomas Hütter
Data Knowl. Eng.4
2025 Extensible and Robust Evaluation of Similarity Queries
abstract
We study the similarity join problem from a systems perspective. A similarity join retrieves all similar record pairs from two collections based on a given distance function. Existing solutions are often optimized for a single distance function and domain. Such monolithic solutions are limited in both their extensibility to new distance functions and their robustness against changing data characteristics. To address these challenges, we introduce Fast, a similarity join algorithm designed for extensible and robust query evaluation. It leverages a novel abstraction called reductions, which transform similarity join problems from complex domains into simpler ones. A reduction graph is constructed to systematically enumerate query plans. Since cost models for similarity queries are typically unavailable, Fast employs runtime partitioning and a sampling-based strategy to select a near-optimal query plan with performance guarantees. It can utilize prebuilt indexes or build them on-the-fly, incorporating caching techniques to accelerate index construction and probing. Extensive experiments across diverse datasets, domains, and distance functions show that Fast consistently performs close to the optimal plan. Finally, two case studies highlight its strength as a baseline and its utility for prototyping future similarity join algorithms.
Daniel Ulrich Schmitt, Thomas Hütter, Nikolaus Augsten
Proc. VLDB Endow.2
2023 FINEX: A Fast Index for Exact & Flexible Density-Based Clustering
abstract
Density-based clustering aims to find groups of similar objects (i.e., clusters) in a given dataset. Applications include, e.g., process mining and anomaly detection. It comes with two user parameters (ε, MinPts) that determine the clustering result, but are typically unknown in advance. Thus, users need to interactively test various settings until satisfying clusterings are found. However, existing solutions suffer from the following limitations: (a) Ineffective pruning of expensive neighborhood computations. (b) Approximate clustering, where objects are falsely labeled noise. (c) Restricted parameter tuning that is limited to ε whereas MinPts is constant, which reduces the explorable clusterings. (d) Inflexibility in terms of applicable data types and distance functions. We propose FINEX, a linear-space index that overcomes these limitations. Our index provides exact clusterings and can be queried with either of the two parameters. FINEX avoids neighborhood computations where possible and reduces the complexities of the remaining computations by leveraging fundamental properties of density-based clusters. Hence, our solution is efficient and flexible regarding data types and distance functions. Moreover, FINEX respects the original and straightforward notion of density-based clustering. In our experiments on 12 large real-world datasets from various domains, FINEX frequently outperforms state-of-the-art techniques for exact clustering by orders of magnitude.
Konstantin Emil Thiel, Daniel Kocher, Nikolaus Augsten, Thomas Hütter, Willi Mann, Daniel Ulrich Schmitt
Proc. ACM Manag. Data4
2023 Benchmarking the Utility of w-event Differential Privacy Mechanisms - When Baselines Become Mighty Competitors
abstract
The w -event framework is the current standard for ensuring differential privacy on continuously monitored data streams. Following the proposition of w -event differential privacy, various mechanisms to implement the framework are proposed. Their comparability in empirical studies is vital for both practitioners to choose a suitable mechanism, and researchers to identify current limitations and propose novel mechanisms. By conducting a literature survey, we observe that the results of existing studies are hardly comparable and partially intrinsically inconsistent. To this end, we formalize an empirical study of w -event mechanisms by re-occurring elements found in our survey. We introduce requirements on these elements that ensure the comparability of experimental results. Moreover, we propose a benchmark that meets all requirements and establishes a new way to evaluate existing and newly proposed mechanisms. Conducting a large-scale empirical study, we gain valuable new insights into the strengths and weaknesses of existing mechanisms. An unexpected - yet explainable - result is a baseline supremacy, i.e., using one of the two baseline mechanisms is expected to deliver good or even the best utility. Finally, we provide guidelines for practitioners to select suitable mechanisms and improvement options for researchers.
Christine Schäler, Thomas Hütter, Martin Schäler
Proc. VLDB Endow.2
2022 JEDI: These aren't the JSON documents you're looking for?
abstract
The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) is a popular data format used in document stores to natively support semi-structured data. In this paper, we address the problem of JSON similarity lookup queries: given a query document and a distance threshold τ, retrieve all documents that are within τ from the query document. Different from other hierarchical formats such as XML, JSON supports both ordered and unordered sibling collections within a single document which poses a new challenge to the tree model and distance computation. We propose JSON tree, a lossless tree representation of JSON documents, and define the JSON Edit Distance (JEDI), the first edit-based distance measure for JSON. We develop QuickJEDI, an algorithm that computes JEDI by leveraging a new technique to prune expensive sibling matchings. It outperforms a baseline algorithm by an order of magnitude in runtime. To boost the performance of JSON similarity queries, we introduce an index called JSIM and an effective upper bound based on tree sorting. Our upper bound algorithm runs in O(nτ) time and O(n+τ log n) space, which substantially improves the previous best bound of O(n2) time and O(n log n) space (where n is the tree size). Our experimental evaluation shows that our solution scales to databases with millions of documents and JSON trees with tens of thousands of nodes.
Thomas Hütter, Nikolaus Augsten, Christoph M. Kirsch, Michael J. Carey 0001, Chen Li 0001
SIGMOD Conference1
2020 DeSignate: detecting signature characters in gene sequence alignments for taxon diagnoses
abstract
BACKGROUND: Molecular characters have been added in integrative taxonomic approaches in recent years. Nevertheless, taxon diagnoses are still widely restricted to morphological characters. The inclusion of molecular characters into taxon diagnoses is not only hampered by problems, such as their definition and the designation of their positions in a reference alignment, but also by the technical effort. RESULTS: DeSignate is a tool for character-based taxon diagnoses that includes a novel ranking scheme. It detects and classifies individual and combined signature characters (diagnostic molecular characters) based on so-called character state vectors. An intuitive web application guides the user through the analysis process and provides the results at a glance. Further, formal definitions and a uniform terminology of characters are introduced. CONCLUSIONS: DeSignate facilitates the inclusion of diagnostic molecular characters and their positions to complement taxon diagnoses. Compared to previous solutions, the tool simplifies the workflow and improves reproducibility and traceability of the results. The tool is freely available as a web application at (https://designate.dbresearch.uni-salzburg.at/) and is open source (https://github.com/DatabaseGroup/DeSignate/).
Thomas Hütter, Maximilian H. Ganser, Manuel Kocher, Merima Halkic, Sabine Agatha, Nikolaus Augsten
BMC Bioinform.1
2019 Effective Filters and Linear Time Verification for Tree Similarity Joins
abstract
The tree similarity join computes all similar pairs in a collection of trees. Two trees are similar if their edit distance falls within a user-defined threshold. Previous algorithms, which are based on a filter-verify approach, suffer from the following two issues. First, ineffective filters produce a large number of candidates that must be further verified. Second, the candidates are verified by computing the tree edit distance, which is cubic in the number of tree nodes. Thus, these techniques fail to scale to large tree collections and are infeasible even for small collections when the trees are large. In this paper, we present a scalable solution for the tree similarity join that is based on (1) an effective indexing technique that leverages both the labels and the structure of trees to reduce the number of candidates, (2) an efficient upper bound filter that moves many of the candidates directly to the join result without additional verification, (3) a linear time verification technique for the remaining candidates that avoids the expensive tree edit distance. We are the first to propose an efficient, non-trivial upper bound and linear time verification for the tree edit distance. Unlike previous solutions, our approach scales to collections with millions of trees. We improve the overall join time by up to two orders of magnitude w.r.t. the state of the art.
Thomas Hütter, Mateusz Pawlik 0001, Robert Loschinger, Nikolaus Augsten
ICDE1
2018 Depreciating Motivation and Empirical Security Analysis of Chaos-Based Image and Video Encryption
abstract
Over the past years, an enormous variety of different chaos-based image and video encryption algorithms have been proposed and published. While any algorithm published undergoes some more or less strict experimental security analysis, many of those schemes are being broken in subsequent publications. In this paper, we show that two main motivations for preferring chaos-based image encryption over classical strong cryptographic encryption, namely computational effort and security benefits, are highly questionable. We demonstrate that several statistical tests, commonly used to assess the security of chaos-based encryption schemes, are insufficient metrics for security analysis. We do this experimentally by constructing obviously insecure encryption schemes and demonstrating that they perform well and/or pass several of these tests. In conclusion, these tests can only give a necessary, but by no means a sufficient condition for security. As a consequence of this paper, several security analyses in related work are questionable; further, methodologies for the security assessment for chaos based encryption schemes need to be entirely reconsidered.
Mario Preishuber, Thomas Hütter, Stefan Katzenbeisser 0001, Andreas Uhl
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.2
2016 Weaknesses in Security Considerations Related to Chaos-Based Image Encryption
Thomas Hütter, Mario Preishuber, Jutta Hämmerle-Uhl, Andreas Uhl
ICICS1
2014 ACDC-JS: explorative benchmarking of javascript memory management
abstract
We present ACDC-JS, an open-source JavaScript memory management benchmarking tool. ACDC-JS incorporates a heap model based on real web applications and may be configured to expose virtually any relevant performance characteristics of JavaScript memory management systems. ACDC-JS is based on ACDC, a benchmarking tool for C/C++ that models periodic allocation and deallocation behavior (AC) as well as persistent memory (DC). We identify important characteristics of JavaScript mutator behavior and propose a configurable heap model based on typical distributions of these characteristics as foundation for ACDC-JS. We describe heap analyses of 13 real web applications extending existing work on JavaScript behavior analysis. Our experimental results show that ACDC-JS enables performance benchmarking and debugging of state-of-the-art JavaScript virtual machines such as V8 and SpiderMonkey by exposing key aspects of their memory management performance.
Martin Aigner 0003, Thomas Hütter, Christoph M. Kirsch, Hannes Payer, Mario Preishuber
DLS2