Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Davor Orlic

dblp:153/1324 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8491-0479ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 44% Collaborative and social computing · 44% Design research and methods · 13%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 77% Information retrieval · 23%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems
user modeling
0.412020
SUM'20: State-based User Modelling · WSDM 2020
Design research and methods › qualitative analysis
reflexive thematic analysis
0.312025
Bridging AI and Humanitarianism: An HCI-Informed Framework for Responsible AI Adoption · CHI 2025
Information retrieval › interactive information retrieval › conversational information seeking
conversational search
0.112020
SUM'20: State-based User Modelling · WSDM 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reflexive thematic analysis · 0.9interviews · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Bridging AI and Humanitarianism: An HCI-Informed Framework for Responsible AI Adoption
abstract
Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) hold transformative potential for humanitarian practice. Yet aligning this potential with the demands of humanitarian practice in dynamic and often resource-austere contexts remains a challenge. While research on Responsible AI provides high-level guidance, humanitarian practice demands nuanced approaches for which human-computer interaction (HCI) can provide a strong foundation. However, existing literature lacks a comprehensive examination of how HCI principles can inform responsible AI adoption in humanitarian practice. To address this gap, we conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of 34 interviews with AI technology experts, humanitarian practitioners, and humanitarian policy developers. Our contributions are twofold. First, we empirically identify three cross-cutting themes—AI risks in humanitarian practice, organisational readiness, and collaboration—that highlight common tensions in adopting AI for humanitarian practice. Second, by analysing their interconnectivities, we reveal intertwined obstacles and propose a conceptual HCI-informed framework.
Tigmanshu Bhatnagar, Maarya Omar, Davor Orlic, Catherine Holloway, Maria Kett
CHI3
2020 SUM'20: State-based User Modelling
abstract
Capturing and effectively utilising user states and goals is becoming a timely challenge for successfully leveraging intelligent and usercentric systems in differentweb search and data mining applications. Examples of such systems are conversational agents, intelligent assistants, educational and contextual information retrieval systems, recommender/match-making systems and advertising systems, all of which rely on identifying the user state in order to provide the most relevant information and assist users in achieving their goals. There has been, however, limited work towards building such state-aware intelligent learning mechanisms. Hence, devising information systems that can keep track of the user's state has been listed as one of the grand challenges to be tackled in the next few years [1]. It is thus timely to organize a workshop that re-visits the problem of designing and evaluating state-aware and user-centric systems, ensuring that the community (spanning academic and industrial backgrounds) works together to tackle these challenges.
Sahan Bulathwela, María Pérez-Ortiz 0001, Rishabh Mehrotra, Davor Orlic, Colin de la Higuera, John Shawe-Taylor, Emine Yilmaz
WSDM4
2015 TraMOOC: Translation for Massive Open Online Courses
Valia Kordoni, Kostadin Cholakov, Markus Egg, Andy Way, Lexi Birch, Katia Kermanidis, Vilelmini Sosoni, Dimitrios Tsoumakos, Antal van den Bosch, Iris Hendrickx, Michael Papadopoulos, Panayota Georgakopoulou, Maria Gialama, Menno van Zaanen, Ioana Buliga, Mitja Jermol, Davor Orlic
EAMT17