Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Heikki Lindroos
dblp:153/2335
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
User interface design and tools · 50% Usability and user experience research · 50% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Web and social media mining · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Web and social media mining › user engagement
social media engagement |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Media Experience of Complementary Information and Tweets on a Second Screen · ACM Multimedia 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-report questionnaire · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Media Experience of Complementary Information and Tweets on a Second ScreenabstractTelevision (TV) programs are increasingly augmented with second-screen applications that can provide complementary information and social media interaction related to the program. However, there is a lack of understanding about the optimal design of such applications. In this paper, we study the effects of complementary information and tweets on the media experience indexed by a comprehensive self-report questionnaire. We built a custom second-screen tablet application and conducted an experiment to investigate the effects of complementary information and tweets on the media experience of TV programs. Apart from reducing concentration and immersion, neither the presence of complementary information nor the presence of tweets affected the media experience of the TV programs, whereas the media experience of second-screen content depended on which program it accompanied. Our results demonstrate that the media experience of complementary information and tweets presented on second screens differs between TV programs. Kenta Kusumoto, Teemu Kinnunen, Jari Kätsyri, Heikki Lindroos, Pirkko Oittinen |
ACM Multimedia | 4 |