Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Junfeng Wen

dblp:153/5459 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
5as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
10 papers
Reinforcement learning · 40% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 11% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 11%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 70% Mathematical optimization · 30%

Topics — the 30 heaviest of 30, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient
1.122022
A Parametric Class of Approximate Gradient Updates for Policy Optimization · ICML 2022
Characterizing the Gap Between Actor-Critic and Policy Gradient · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov reward process
1.012026
An MRP Formulation for Supervised Learning: Generalized Temporal Difference Learning Models (Abstract Reprint) · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
temporal difference learning
1.012026
An MRP Formulation for Supervised Learning: Generalized Temporal Difference Learning Models (Abstract Reprint) · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
adaptive computation
0.912025
LookWhere? Efficient Visual Recognition by Learning Where to Look and What to See from Self-Supervision · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › visual recognition
high-resolution image recognition
0.912025
LookWhere? Efficient Visual Recognition by Learning Where to Look and What to See from Self-Supervision · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer
0.912025
LookWhere? Efficient Visual Recognition by Learning Where to Look and What to See from Self-Supervision · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
0.612022
A Parametric Class of Approximate Gradient Updates for Policy Optimization · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
actor-critic methods
0.512021
Characterizing the Gap Between Actor-Critic and Policy Gradient · ICML 2021
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
stackelberg game
0.512021
Characterizing the Gap Between Actor-Critic and Policy Gradient · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain gap
0.412020
Domain Aggregation Networks for Multi-Source Domain Adaptation · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.412020
Domain Aggregation Networks for Multi-Source Domain Adaptation · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
markov chain
0.412020
Batch Stationary Distribution Estimation · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
multi-source domain adaptation
0.412020
Domain Aggregation Networks for Multi-Source Domain Adaptation · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy evaluation
0.412020
Batch Stationary Distribution Estimation · ICML 2020
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation
0.312025
LookWhere? Efficient Visual Recognition by Learning Where to Look and What to See from Self-Supervision · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction
conditional random field
0.212016
Convex Two-Layer Modeling with Latent Structure · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convex relaxation
0.212016
Convex Two-Layer Modeling with Latent Structure · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction
latent structured prediction
0.212016
Convex Two-Layer Modeling with Latent Structure · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation › distribution adaptation
covariate shift adaptation
0.212015
Correcting Covariate Shift with the Frank-Wolfe Algorithm · IJCAI 2015
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
maximum likelihood estimation
0.212015
Optimal Estimation of Multivariate ARMA Models · AAAI 2015
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain shift
covariate shift
0.212014
Robust Learning under Uncertain Test Distributions: Relating Covariate Shift to Model Misspecification · ICML 2014
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift
0.212014
Robust Learning under Uncertain Test Distributions: Relating Covariate Shift to Model Misspecification · ICML 2014
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
model misspecification
0.212014
Robust Learning under Uncertain Test Distributions: Relating Covariate Shift to Model Misspecification · ICML 2014
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
robust learning
0.212014
Robust Learning under Uncertain Test Distributions: Relating Covariate Shift to Model Misspecification · ICML 2014
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient estimation
0.112021
Characterizing the Gap Between Actor-Critic and Policy Gradient · ICML 2021
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition
0.112020
Domain Aggregation Networks for Multi-Source Domain Adaptation · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.112020
Batch Stationary Distribution Estimation · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
time series analysis
0.112015
Optimal Estimation of Multivariate ARMA Models · AAAI 2015
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training
0.112014
Robust Learning under Uncertain Test Distributions: Relating Covariate Shift to Model Misspecification · ICML 2014
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.112014
Robust Learning under Uncertain Test Distributions: Relating Covariate Shift to Model Misspecification · ICML 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stackelberg game formulation · 1.0residual actor-critic · 1.0ordinary least squares · 1.0convergence analysis · 1.0bellman operator · 1.0self-supervised distillation · 0.9low-resolution selector · 0.9high-resolution extractor · 0.9trust region method · 0.6gradient scaling · 0.6structured matrix norm optimization · 0.2regularized maximum likelihood · 0.2imputation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 An MRP Formulation for Supervised Learning: Generalized Temporal Difference Learning Models (Abstract Reprint)
abstract
Background: Traditional supervised learning (SL) assumes data points are independently and identically distributed (i.i.d.), which overlooks dependencies in real-world data. Reinforcement learning (RL), in contrast, models dependencies through state transitions. Objectives: This study aims to bridge SL and RL by reformulating SL problems as RL tasks, enabling the application of RL techniques to a wider range of SL scenarios. We aim to model SL data as interconnected, and develop novel temporal difference (TD) algorithms that can accommodate diverse data types. Our objectives are to (1) establish conditions where TD outperforms ordinary least squares (OLS), (2) provide convergence guarantees for the generalized TD algorithm, and (3) validate the approach empirically using synthetic and real-world datasets. Methods: We reformulate traditional SL as a RL problem by modeling data points as a Markov Reward Process (MRP). We then introduce a concept analogous to the inverse link function in generalized linear models, allowing our TD algorithm to handle various data types. Our analysis, grounded in variance estimation, identifies conditions where TD outperforms OLS. We establish a convergence guarantee by conceptualizing the TD update rule as a generalized Bellman operator. Empirical validation begins with synthetic data progressively matching theoretical assumptions to verify our analysis, followed by evaluations on real-world datasets to demonstrate practical utility. Results: Our theoretical analysis shows that TD can outperform OLS in estimation accuracy when data noise is correlated. Our approach generalizes across various loss functions and SL datasets. We prove that the Bellman operator in our TD framework is a contraction, ensuring convergence for both expected and stochastic TD updates. Empirically, TD outperforms SL baselines when data aligns with its assumptions, remains competitive across diverse datasets, and is robust to hyperparameter choices. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that SL can be reformulated as a problem of interconnected data modeled by an MRP, effectively solved using TD learning. Our generalized TD is theoretically sound, with convergence guarantees, and practically effective. It generalizes OLS, offering superior performance on correlated data. This work enables RL techniques to benefit SL tasks, offering a pathway for future advancements.
Yangchen Pan, Junfeng Wen, Chenjun Xiao, Philip Torr 0001
AAAI2
2025 LookWhere? Efficient Visual Recognition by Learning Where to Look and What to See from Self-Supervision
abstract
Vision transformers are ever larger, more accurate, and more expensive to compute. At high resolution, the expense is even more extreme as the number of tokens grows quadratically in the image size. We turn to adaptive computation to cope with this cost by learning to predict where to compute. Our LookWhere method divides the computation between a low-resolution selector and a high-resolution extractor without ever processing the full high-resolution input. We jointly pretrain the selector and extractor without task supervision by distillation from a self-supervised teacher, in effect learning where and what to compute at the same time. Unlike prior token reduction methods, which pay to save by pruning already-computed tokens, and prior token selection methods, which require complex and expensive per-task optimization, LookWhere economically and accurately selects and extracts transferrable representations of images. We show that LookWhere excels at sparse recognition on high-resolution inputs (Traffic Signs), maintaining accuracy while reducing FLOPs by 17x and time by 4x, and standard recognition tasks that are global (ImageNet classification) and local (ADE20K segmentation), improving accuracy while reducing time by 1.36x.
Anthony Fuller, Yousef Yassin, Junfeng Wen, Tarek Ibrahim, Daniel G. Kyrollos, James R. Green, Evan Shelhamer
NeurIPS3
2025 An MRP Formulation for Supervised Learning: Generalized Temporal Difference Learning Models
abstract
Background: Traditional supervised learning (SL) assumes data points are independently and identically distributed (i.i.d.), which overlooks dependencies in real-world data. Reinforcement learning (RL), in contrast, models dependencies through state transitions. Objectives: This study aims to bridge SL and RL by reformulating SL problems as RL tasks, enabling the application of RL techniques to a wider range of SL scenarios. We aim to model SL data as interconnected, and develop novel temporal difference (TD) algorithms that can accommodate diverse data types. Our objectives are to (1) establish conditions where TD outperforms ordinary least squares (OLS), (2) provide convergence guarantees for the generalized TD algorithm, and (3) validate the approach empirically using synthetic and real-world datasets. Methods: We reformulate traditional SL as a RL problem by modeling data points as a Markov Reward Process (MRP). We then introduce a concept analogous to the inverse link function in generalized linear models, allowing our TD algorithm to handle various data types. Our analysis, grounded in variance estimation, identifies conditions where TD outperforms OLS. We establish a convergence guarantee by conceptualizing the TD update rule as a generalized Bellman operator. Empirical validation begins with synthetic data progressively matching theoretical assumptions to verify our analysis, followed by evaluations on real-world datasets to demonstrate practical utility. Results: Our theoretical analysis shows that TD can outperform OLS in estimation accuracy when data noise is correlated. Our approach generalizes across various loss functions and SL datasets. We prove that the Bellman operator in our TD framework is a contraction, ensuring convergence for both expected and stochastic TD updates. Empirically, TD outperforms SL baselines when data aligns with its assumptions, remains competitive across diverse datasets, and is robust to hyperparameter choices. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that SL can be reformulated as a problem of interconnected data modeled by an MRP, effectively solved using TD learning. Our generalized TD is theoretically sound, with convergence guarantees, and practically effective. It generalizes OLS, offering superior performance on correlated data. This work enables RL techniques to benefit SL tasks, offering a pathway for future advancements.
Yangchen Pan, Junfeng Wen, Chenjun Xiao, Philip Torr 0001
J. Artif. Intell. Res.2
2022 A Parametric Class of Approximate Gradient Updates for Policy Optimization
abstract
Approaches to policy optimization have been motivated from diverse principles, based on how the parametric model is interpreted (e.g. value versus policy representation) or how the learning objective is formulated, yet they share a common goal of maximizing expected return. To better capture the commonalities and identify key differences between policy optimization methods, we develop a unified perspective that re-expresses the underlying updates in terms of a limited choice of gradient form and scaling function. In particular, we identify a parameterized space of approximate gradient updates for policy optimization that is highly structured, yet covers both classical and recent examples, including PPO. As a result, we obtain novel yet well motivated updates that generalize existing algorithms in a way that can deliver benefits both in terms of convergence speed and final result quality. An experimental investigation demonstrates that the additional degrees of freedom provided in the parameterized family of updates can be leveraged to obtain non-trivial improvements both in synthetic domains and on popular deep RL benchmarks.
Ramki Gummadi, Saurabh Kumar 0004, Junfeng Wen, Dale Schuurmans
ICML3
2021 Characterizing the Gap Between Actor-Critic and Policy Gradient
abstract
Actor-critic (AC) methods are ubiquitous in reinforcement learning. Although it is understood that AC methods are closely related to policy gradient (PG), their precise connection has not been fully characterized previously. In this paper, we explain the gap between AC and PG methods by identifying the exact adjustment to the AC objective/gradient that recovers the true policy gradient of the cumulative reward objective (PG). Furthermore, by viewing the AC method as a two-player Stackelberg game between the actor and critic, we show that the Stackelberg policy gradient can be recovered as a special case of our more general analysis. Based on these results, we develop practical algorithms, Residual Actor-Critic and Stackelberg Actor-Critic, for estimating the correction between AC and PG and use these to modify the standard AC algorithm. Experiments on popular tabular and continuous environments show the proposed corrections can improve both the sample efficiency and final performance of existing AC methods.
Junfeng Wen, Saurabh Kumar 0004, Ramki Gummadi, Dale Schuurmans
ICML1
2020 Batch Stationary Distribution Estimation
abstract
We consider the problem of approximating the stationary distribution of an ergodic Markov chain given a set of sampled transitions. Classical simulation-based approaches assume access to the underlying process so that trajectories of sufficient length can be gathered to approximate stationary sampling. Instead, we consider an alternative setting where a \emph{fixed} set of transitions has been collected beforehand, by a separate, possibly unknown procedure. The goal is still to estimate properties of the stationary distribution, but without additional access to the underlying system. We propose a consistent estimator that is based on recovering a correction ratio function over the given data. In particular, we develop a variational power method (VPM) that provides provably consistent estimates under general conditions. In addition to unifying a number of existing approaches from different subfields, we also find that VPM yields significantly better estimates across a range of problems, including queueing, stochastic differential equations, post-processing MCMC, and off-policy evaluation.
Junfeng Wen, Bo Dai 0001, Lihong Li 0001, Dale Schuurmans
ICML1
2020 Domain Aggregation Networks for Multi-Source Domain Adaptation
abstract
In many real-world applications, we want to exploit multiple source datasets to build a model for a different but related target dataset. Despite the recent empirical success, most existing research has used ad-hoc methods to combine multiple sources, leading to a gap between theory and practice. In this paper, we develop a finite-sample generalization bound based on domain discrepancy and accordingly propose a theoretically justified optimization procedure. Our algorithm, Domain AggRegation Network (DARN), can automatically and dynamically balance between including more data to increase effective sample size and excluding irrelevant data to avoid negative effects during training. We find that DARN can significantly outperform the state-of-the-art alternatives on multiple real-world tasks, including digit/object recognition and sentiment analysis.
Junfeng Wen, Russell Greiner, Dale Schuurmans
ICML1
2016 Convex Two-Layer Modeling with Latent Structure
abstract
Unsupervised learning of structured predictors has been a long standing pursuit in machine learning. Recently a conditional random field auto-encoder has been proposed in a two-layer setting, allowing latent structured representation to be automatically inferred. Aside from being nonconvex, it also requires the demanding inference of normalization. In this paper, we develop a convex relaxation of two-layer conditional model which captures latent structure and estimates model parameters, jointly and optimally. We further expand its applicability by resorting to a weaker form of inference---maximum a-posteriori. The flexibility of the model is demonstrated on two structures based on total unimodularity---graph matching and linear chain. Experimental results confirm the promise of the method.
Vignesh Ganapathiraman, Yaoliang Yu, Junfeng Wen
NIPS4
2015 Optimal Estimation of Multivariate ARMA Models
abstract
Autoregressive moving average (ARMA) models are a fundamental tool in timeseries analysis that offer intuitive modeling capability and efficient predictors. Unfortunately, the lack of globally optimal parameter estimation strategies for these models remains a problem:application studies often adopt the simpler autoregressive model that can be easily estimated by maximizing (a posteriori) likelihood. We develop a (regularized, imputed) maximum likelihood criterion that admits efficient global estimation via structured matrix norm optimization methods. An empirical evaluation demonstrates the benefits of globally optimal parameter estimation over local and moment matching approaches.
Martha White, Junfeng Wen, Michael H. Bowling, Dale Schuurmans
AAAI2
2015 Correcting Covariate Shift with the Frank-Wolfe Algorithm
Junfeng Wen, Russell Greiner, Dale Schuurmans
IJCAI1
2014 Robust Learning under Uncertain Test Distributions: Relating Covariate Shift to Model Misspecification
abstract
Many learning situations involve learning the conditional distribution p(y|x) when the training instances are drawn from the training distribution p_tr(x), even though it will later be used to predict for instances drawn from a different test distribution p_te(x). Most current approaches focus on learning how to reweigh the training examples, to make them resemble the test distribution. However, reweighing does not always help, because (we show that) the test error also depends on the correctness of the underlying model class. This paper analyses this situation by viewing the problem of learning under changing distributions as a game between a learner and an adversary. We characterize when such reweighing is needed, and also provide an algorithm, robust covariate shift adjustment (RCSA), that provides relevant weights. Our empirical studies, on UCI datasets and a real-world cancer prognostic prediction dataset, show that our analysis applies, and that our RCSA works effectively.
Junfeng Wen, Chun-Nam Yu, Russell Greiner
ICML1