Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Henrika Pihlajaniemi
dblp:153/5599
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Design research and methods · 77% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Design research and methods › design probe
cultural probes |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Evaluation Probes · CHI 2015 |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
urban technologies |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Evaluation Probes · CHI 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
field study · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Evaluation ProbesabstractWe introduce evaluation probes for conducting emic, experiential evaluation of urban technologies "in the wild" without direct researcher presence. We commence with a thorough discussion and analysis of the original cultural probes, used by Gaver, Dunne and Pacenti to gain design inspiration, and their subsequent variations. We develop the concept of evaluation probes through careful re-conceptualization and application of the cultural probes in three successive studies conducted in the wild. We recount and reflect on our use of evaluation probes and discuss their merits and limitations in experiential emic evaluation. Anna Luusua, Johanna Ylipulli, Marko Jurmu, Henrika Pihlajaniemi, Piia Markkanen, Timo Ojala |
CHI | 4 |