Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nigel J. Foster

dblp:154/3420 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 56% Graph learning · 44%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph matching
attributed graph matching
0.011989
Attributed image matching using a minimum representation size criterion · ICRA 1989
Computer vision › 3D vision
feature matching
0.011989
Attributed image matching using a minimum representation size criterion · ICRA 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

minimum representation criterion · 0.0minimum description length · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 Attributed image matching using a minimum representation size criterion
abstract
The authors describe a novel approach to image matching which utilizes the minimal representation criterion as a means to obtain robust matching performance, even when image data are extremely noisy. They describe the application of this approach to the problem of matching noisy gray-level images to attributed models. Using the minimum representation criterion, the match between gray-level image features and an attributed graph model incorporates a representation size measure for the modeled points, the data residuals, and the unmodeled points. This structural representation identifies correspondence between a subset of data points and a subset of model points in a manner which minimizes the complexity of the resulting model. The proposed minimum representation matching algorithm is polynomial in complexity, and exhibits robust matching performance on examples where less than 30% of the features are reliable. The minimum representation principle is extensible to related problems using three-dimensional models and multisensor data matching.>
Arthur C. Sanderson, Nigel J. Foster
ICRA2
1984 A fast algorithm for cellular logic operations on sequential machines
Frans C. A. Groen, Nigel J. Foster
Pattern Recognit. Lett.2