Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Toru Hishinuma

dblp:154/6308 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 80% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 20%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation › distribution adaptation
covariate shift adaptation
0.512021
Weighted model estimation for offline model-based reinforcement learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › offline reinforcement learning
model-based offline reinforcement learning
0.512021
Weighted model estimation for offline model-based reinforcement learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.512021
Weighted model estimation for offline model-based reinforcement learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning › model learning
model estimation
0.512021
Weighted model estimation for offline model-based reinforcement learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy evaluation
0.512021
Weighted model estimation for offline model-based reinforcement learning · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

importance weighting · 0.5density ratio estimation · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Weighted model estimation for offline model-based reinforcement learning
abstract
This paper discusses model estimation in offline model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL), which is important for subsequent policy improvement using an estimated model. From the viewpoint of covariate shift, a natural idea is model estimation weighted by the ratio of the state-action distributions of offline data and real future data. However, estimating such a natural weight is one of the main challenges for off-policy evaluation, which is not easy to use. As an artificial alternative, this paper considers weighting with the state-action distribution ratio of offline data and simulated future data, which can be estimated relatively easily by standard density ratio estimation techniques for supervised learning. Based on the artificial weight, this paper defines a loss function for offline MBRL and presents an algorithm to optimize it. Weighting with the artificial weight is justified as evaluating an upper bound of the policy evaluation error. Numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of weighting with the artificial weight.
Toru Hishinuma, Kei Senda
NeurIPS1
2014 Acceleration of Reinforcement Learning by Policy Evaluation Using Nonstationary Iterative Method
abstract
Typical methods for solving reinforcement learning problems iterate two steps, policy evaluation and policy improvement. This paper proposes algorithms for the policy evaluation to improve learning efficiency. The proposed algorithms are based on the Krylov Subspace Method (KSM), which is a nonstationary iterative method. The algorithms based on KSM are tens to hundreds times more efficient than existing algorithms based on the stationary iterative methods. Algorithms based on KSM are far more efficient than they have been generally expected. This paper clarifies what makes algorithms based on KSM makes more efficient with numerical examples and theoretical discussions.
Kei Senda, Suguru Hattori, Toru Hishinuma, Takehisa Kohda
IEEE Trans. Cybern.3