Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pratibha Vellanki
dblp:155/3128
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0001-8910-8533ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 92% Deep learning architectures and training · 8% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Bayesian Functional Optimisation with Shape Prior · AAAI 2019 Process-constrained batch Bayesian optimisation · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization
functional optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Bayesian Functional Optimisation with Shape Prior · AAAI 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Bayesian Functional Optimisation with Shape Prior · AAAI 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
black-box optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Bayesian Functional Optimisation with Shape Prior · AAAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
batch bayesian optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Process-constrained batch Bayesian optimisation · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gaussian process · 1.0shape prior · 0.8bernstein polynomial basis · 0.8regret analysis · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Accelerated Bayesian Optimisation through Weight-Prior TuningabstractBayesian optimization (BO) is a widely-used method for optimizing expensive (to evaluate) problems. At the core of most BO methods is the modeling of the objective function using a Gaussian Process (GP) whose covariance is selected from a set of standard covariance functions. From a weight-space view, this models the objective as a linear function in a feature space implied by the given covariance $K$, with an arbitrary Gaussian weight prior ${\bf w} \sim ormdist ({\bf 0},{\bf I})$. In many practical applications there is data available that has a similar (covariance) structure to the objective, but which, having different form, cannot be used directly in standard transfer learning. In this paper we show how such auxiliary data may be used to construct a GP covariance corresponding to a more appropriate weight prior for the objective function. Building on this, we show that we may accelerate BO by modeling the objective function using this (learned) weight prior, which we demonstrate on both test functions and a practical application to short-polymer fibre manufacture. Alistair Shilton, Sunil Gupta 0001, Santu Rana, Pratibha Vellanki, Cheng Li 0003, Svetha Venkatesh, Laurence Anthony F. Park, Alessandra Sutti, David Rubin, Thomas Dorin, Alireza Vahid, Murray Height, Teo Slezak |
AISTATS | 4 |
| 2019 | Bayesian Functional Optimisation with Shape PriorabstractReal world experiments are expensive, and thus it is important to reach a target in a minimum number of experiments. Experimental processes often involve control variables that change over time. Such problems can be formulated as functional optimisation problem. We develop a novel Bayesian optimisation framework for such functional optimisation of expensive black-box processes. We represent the control function using Bernstein polynomial basis and optimise in the coefficient space. We derive the theory and practice required to dynamically adjust the order of the polynomial degree, and show how prior information about shape can be integrated. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach for short polymer fibre design and optimising learning rate schedules for deep networks. Pratibha Vellanki, Santu Rana, Sunil Gupta 0001, David Rubin de Celis Leal, Alessandra Sutti, Murray Height, Svetha Venkatesh |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2017 | Process-constrained batch Bayesian optimisationabstractAbstract Prevailing batch Bayesian optimisation methods allow all control variables to be freely altered at each iteration. Real-world experiments, however, often have physical limitations making it time-consuming to alter all settings for each recommendation in a batch. This gives rise to a unique problem in BO: in a recommended batch, a set of variables that are expensive to experimentally change need to be fixed, while the remaining control variables can be varied. We formulate this as a process-constrained batch Bayesian optimisation problem. We propose two algorithms, pc-BO(basic) and pc-BO(nested). pc-BO(basic) is simpler but lacks convergence guarantee. In contrast pc-BO(nested) is slightly more complex, but admits convergence analysis. We show that the regret of pc-BO(nested) is sublinear. We demonstrate the performance of both pc-BO(basic) and pc-BO(nested) by optimising benchmark test functions, tuning hyper-parameters of the SVM classifier, optimising the heat-treatment process for an Al-Sc alloy to achieve target hardness, and optimising the short polymer fibre production process. Pratibha Vellanki, Santu Rana, Sunil Gupta 0001, David Rubin, Alessandra Sutti, Thomas Dorin, Murray Height, Paul G. Sanders, Svetha Venkatesh |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2017 | Nonparametric discovery and analysis of learning patterns and autism subgroups from therapeutic data
Pratibha Vellanki, Thi V. Duong, Sunil Gupta 0001, Svetha Venkatesh, Dinh Q. Phung |
Knowl. Inf. Syst. | 1 |
| 2014 | Nonparametric Discovery of Learning Patterns and Autism Subgroups from Therapeutic DataabstractAutism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is growing at a staggering rate, but, little is known about the cause of this condition. Inferring learning patterns from therapeutic performance data, and subsequently clustering ASD children into subgroups, is important to understand this domain, and more importantly to inform evidence-based intervention. However, this data-driven task was difficult in the past due to insufficiency of data to perform reliable analysis. For the first time, using data from a recent application for early intervention in autism (TOBY Play pad), whose download count is now exceeding 4500, we present in this paper the automatic discovery of learning patterns across 32 skills in sensory, imitation and language. We use unsupervised learning methods for this task, but a notorious problem with existing methods is the correct specification of number of patterns in advance, which in our case is even more difficult due to complexity of the data. To this end, we appeal to recent Bayesian nonparametric methods, in particular the use of Bayesian Nonparametric Factor Analysis. This model uses Indian Buffet Process (IBP) as prior on a binary matrix of infinite columns to allocate groups of intervention skills to children. The optimal number of learning patterns as well as subgroup assignments are inferred automatically from data. Our experimental results follow an exploratory approach, present different newly discovered learning patterns. To provide quantitative results, we also report the clustering evaluation against K-means and Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF). In addition to the novelty of this new problem, we were able to demonstrate the suitability of Bayesian nonparametric models over parametric rivals. Pratibha Vellanki, Thi V. Duong, Svetha Venkatesh, Dinh Q. Phung |
ICPR | 1 |