Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Álvaro Cartea

dblp:157/3732 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7426-4645ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 43% Deep learning architectures and training · 16% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 14%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit
0.912025
Martingale Posterior Neural Networks for Fast Sequential Decision Making · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks
0.912025
Martingale Posterior Neural Networks for Fast Sequential Decision Making · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.912025
Martingale Posterior Neural Networks for Fast Sequential Decision Making · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
contextual bandit
0.912025
Martingale Posterior Neural Networks for Fast Sequential Decision Making · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit › contextual bandit
non-stationary contextual bandit
0.912025
Martingale Posterior Neural Networks for Fast Sequential Decision Making · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › sequence representation learning
time series representation learning
0.812024
Rough Transformers: Lightweight and Continuous Time Series Modelling through Signature Patching · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.812024
Rough Transformers: Lightweight and Continuous Time Series Modelling through Signature Patching · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
neural ordinary differential equations
0.212024
Rough Transformers: Lightweight and Continuous Time Series Modelling through Signature Patching · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

thompson sampling · 0.9martingale posteriors · 0.9kalman-filter recursion · 0.9path signature · 0.8multi-view signature attention · 0.8attention mechanism · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Martingale Posterior Neural Networks for Fast Sequential Decision Making
abstract
We introduce scalable algorithms for online learning of neural network parameters and Bayesian sequential decision making. Unlike classical Bayesian neural networks, which induce predictive uncertainty through a posterior over model parameters, our methods adopt a predictive-first perspective based on martingale posteriors. In particular, we work directly with the one-step-ahead posterior predictive, which we parameterize with a neural network and update sequentially with incoming observations. This decouples Bayesian decision-making from parameter-space inference: we sample from the posterior predictive for decision making, and update the parameters of the posterior predictive via fast, frequentist Kalman-filter-like recursions. Our algorithms operate in a fully online, replay-free setting, providing principled uncertainty quantification without costly posterior sampling. Empirically, they achieve competitive performance–speed trade-offs in non-stationary contextual bandits and Bayesian optimization, offering 10–100 times faster inference than classical Thompson sampling while maintaining comparable or superior decision performance.
Gerardo Duràn-Martín, Leandro Sánchez-Betancourt, Álvaro Cartea, Kevin Murphy 0002
NeurIPS3
2024 Rough Transformers: Lightweight and Continuous Time Series Modelling through Signature Patching
abstract
Time-series data in real-world settings typically exhibit long-range dependencies and are observed at non-uniform intervals. In these settings, traditional sequence-based recurrent models struggle. To overcome this, researchers often replace recurrent models with Neural ODE-based architectures to account for irregularly sampled data and use Transformer-based architectures to account for long-range dependencies. Despite the success of these two approaches, both incur very high computational costs for input sequences of even moderate length. To address this challenge, we introduce the Rough Transformer, a variation of the Transformer model that operates on continuous-time representations of input sequences and incurs significantly lower computational costs. In particular, we propose multi-view signature attention, which uses path signatures to augment vanilla attention and to capture both local and global (multi-scale) dependencies in the input data, while remaining robust to changes in the sequence length and sampling frequency and yielding improved spatial processing. We find that, on a variety of time-series-related tasks, Rough Transformers consistently outperform their vanilla attention counterparts while obtaining the representational benefits of Neural ODE-based models, all at a fraction of the computational time and memory resources.
Fernando Moreno-Pino, Alvaro Arroyo, Harrison Waldon, Xiaowen Dong 0001, Álvaro Cartea
NeurIPS5