Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brian Johannesmeyer
dblp:157/3785
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-6882-3024ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 6 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
6 papers |
Systems and software security · 73% Hardware security and side channels · 22% Malware analysis · 5% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
5 papers |
Program analysis · 29% Concurrent programming · 29% Operating systems · 19% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Systems and software security
operating system security |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Dynamic Detection of Vulnerable DMA Race Conditions · CCS 2025 |
Concurrent programming › concurrency bug detection
data race detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Dynamic Detection of Vulnerable DMA Race Conditions · CCS 2025 |
Program analysis
dynamic analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Dynamic Detection of Vulnerable DMA Race Conditions · CCS 2025 |
Systems and software security
exploitation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Practical Data-Only Attack Generation · USENIX Security Symposium 2024 |
Systems and software security › exploitation
non-control data attack |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Practical Data-Only Attack Generation · USENIX Security Symposium 2024 |
Hardware security and side channels › microarchitectural attacks
transient execution attack |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Kasper: Scanning for Generalized Transient Execution Gadgets in the Linux Kernel · NDSS 2022 |
Operating systems › system security › operating system security
kernel security |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Kasper: Scanning for Generalized Transient Execution Gadgets in the Linux Kernel · NDSS 2022 |
Programming languages and type systems
domain-specific languages |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | FaCT: a DSL for timing-sensitive computation · PLDI 2019 |
Systems and software security
memory safety |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Dead Store Elimination (Still) Considered Harmful · USENIX Security Symposium 2017 |
Compilers and program optimization
compiler optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Dead Store Elimination (Still) Considered Harmful · USENIX Security Symposium 2017 |
Hardware security and side channels › hardware attacks
DMA attacks |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Dynamic Detection of Vulnerable DMA Race Conditions · CCS 2025 |
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Practical Data-Only Attack Generation · USENIX Security Symposium 2024 |
Systems and software security
binary analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A Generic Approach to Automatic Deobfuscation of Executable Code · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2015 |
Malware analysis › obfuscation analysis
code deobfuscation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A Generic Approach to Automatic Deobfuscation of Executable Code · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2015 |
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack
timing side channel |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | FaCT: a DSL for timing-sensitive computation · PLDI 2019 |
Compilers and program optimization › program transformation
semantics-preserving transformation |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | A Generic Approach to Automatic Deobfuscation of Executable Code · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
taint tracking · 1.7dynamic analysis · 1.7memory corruption · 0.8control-flow integrity bypass · 0.8constant-time programming · 0.8static analysis · 0.6semantics-preserving simplification · 0.4program transformation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Dynamic Detection of Vulnerable DMA Race ConditionsabstractThe drivers of modern operating systems use Direct Memory Access (DMA) to efficiently communicate with peripheral devices. Since the memory accessed by DMA is a shared resource between driver and device, it is a possible source of race conditions. Peripheral devices are also often untrusted, so these race conditions open up a new potential attack vector against a trusted OS kernel. In this paper, we present DMARacer, a dynamic detector called for these DMA-based race conditions in kernel code. DMARacer tracks memory accesses to DMA memory throughout the kernel's lifetime and analyses them for various indicators of race conditions. Additionally, upon detecting a race condition, DMARacer uses taint tracking to trace its impact and identify any potential vulnerabilities it may trigger, such as memory corruption or denial-of-service. We used DMARacer to search the drivers of the Linux kernel for DMA-based errors and find that DMA-based race conditions are a systemic issue in driver code. In total, DMARacer was able to detect 817 problematic memory accesses and 344 vulnerable operations in the scanned Linux kernel drivers. Brian Johannesmeyer, Raphael Isemann, Cristiano Giuffrida, Herbert Bos |
CCS | 1 |
| 2024 | Practical Data-Only Attack Generation
Brian Johannesmeyer, Asia Slowinska, Herbert Bos, Cristiano Giuffrida |
USENIX Security Symposium | 1 |
| 2022 | Kasper: Scanning for Generalized Transient Execution Gadgets in the Linux Kernel
Brian Johannesmeyer, Jakob Koschel, Kaveh Razavi, Herbert Bos, Cristiano Giuffrida |
NDSS | 1 |
| 2019 | FaCT: a DSL for timing-sensitive computationabstractReal-world cryptographic code is often written in a subset of C intended to execute in constant-time, thereby avoiding timing side channel vulnerabilities. This C subset eschews structured programming as we know it: if-statements, looping constructs, and procedural abstractions can leak timing information when handling sensitive data. The resulting obfuscation has led to subtle bugs, even in widely-used high-profile libraries like OpenSSL. Sunjay Cauligi, Gary Soeller, Brian Johannesmeyer, Fraser Brown, Riad S. Wahby, John Renner, Benjamin Grégoire, Gilles Barthe, Ranjit Jhala, Deian Stefan |
PLDI | 3 |
| 2017 | Dead Store Elimination (Still) Considered Harmful
Zhaomo Yang, Brian Johannesmeyer, Anders Trier Olesen, Sorin Lerner, Kirill Levchenko |
USENIX Security Symposium | 2 |
| 2015 | Identifying and Understanding Self-Checksumming Defenses in SoftwareabstractSoftware self-checksumming is widely used as an anti-tampering mechanism for protecting intellectual property and deterring piracy. This makes it important to understand the strengths and weaknesses of various approaches to self-checksumming. This paper describes a dynamic information-flow-based attack that aims to identify and understand self-checksumming behavior in software. Our approach is applicable to a wide class of self chesumming defenses and the information obtained can be used to determine how the checksumming defenses may be bypassed. Experiments using a prototype implementation of our ideas indicate that our approach can successfully identify self-checksumming behavior in (our implementations of) proposals from the research literature. Jing Qiu 0003, Babak Yadegari, Brian Johannesmeyer, Saumya K. Debray, Xiaohong Su |
CODASPY | 3 |
| 2015 | A Generic Approach to Automatic Deobfuscation of Executable CodeabstractMalicious software are usually obfuscated to avoid detection and resist analysis. When new malware is encountered, such obfuscations have to be penetrated or removed ("deobfuscated") in order to understand the internal logic of the code and devise countermeasures. This paper discusses a generic approach for deobfuscation of obfuscated executable code. Our approach does not make any assumptions about the nature of the obfuscations used, but instead uses semantics-preserving program transformations to simplify away obfuscation code. We have applied a prototype implementation of our ideas to a variety of different kinds of obfuscation, including emulation-based obfuscation, emulation-based obfuscation with runtime code unpacking, and return-oriented programming. Our experimental results are encouraging and suggest that this approach can be effective in extracting the internal logic from code obfuscated using a variety of obfuscation techniques, including tools such as Themida that previous approaches could not handle. Babak Yadegari, Brian Johannesmeyer, Ben Whitely, Saumya K. Debray |
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy | 2 |