Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Paul Blomstedt
dblp:158/7943
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 57% Efficient and distributed learning · 43% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed inference
distributed bayesian inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Expectation Propagation as a Way of Life: A Framework for Bayesian Inference on Partitioned Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
expectation propagation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Expectation Propagation as a Way of Life: A Framework for Bayesian Inference on Partitioned Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Scalable Bayesian Non-linear Matrix Completion · IJCAI 2019 |
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Scalable Bayesian Non-linear Matrix Completion · IJCAI 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene expression clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Modelling-based experiment retrieval: a case study with gene expression clustering · Bioinform. 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › clustering
bayesian clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A Bayesian Predictive Model for Clustering Data of Mixed Discrete and Continuous Type · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gaussian process latent variable model · 0.8data-parallel distributed computation · 0.8laplace approximation · 0.4expectation propagation · 0.4data partitioning · 0.4product partition model · 0.2normalized information distance · 0.2k-means · 0.2random partition · 0.2posterior partition search · 0.2conjugate analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Federated stochastic gradient Langevin dynamicsabstractStochastic gradient MCMC methods, such as stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics (SGLD), employ fast but noisy gradient estimates to enable large-scale posterior sampling. Although we can easily extend SGLD to distributed settings, it suffers from two issues when applied to federated non-IID data. First, the variance of these estimates increases significantly. Second, delaying communication causes the Markov chains to diverge from the true posterior even for very simple models. To alleviate both these problems, we propose conducive gradients, a simple mechanism that combines local likelihood approximations to correct gradient updates. Notably, conducive gradients are easy to compute, and since we only calculate the approximations once, they incur negligible overhead. We apply conducive gradients to distributed stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics (DSGLD) and call the resulting method “federated stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics” (FSGLD). We demonstrate that our approach can handle delayed communication rounds, converging to the target posterior in cases where DSGLD fails. We also show that FSGLD outperforms DSGLD for non-IID federated data with experiments on metric learning and neural networks. Khaoula el Mekkaoui, Diego Mesquita, Paul Blomstedt, Samuel Kaski |
UAI | 3 |
| 2020 | Expectation Propagation as a Way of Life: A Framework for Bayesian Inference on Partitioned DataabstractA common divide-and-conquer approach for Bayesian computation with big data is to partition the data, perform local inference for each piece separately, and combine the results to obtain a global posterior approximation. While being conceptually and computationally appealing, this method involves the problematic need to also split the prior for the local inferences; these weakened priors may not provide enough regularization for each separate computation, thus eliminating one of the key advantages of Bayesian methods. To resolve this dilemma while still retaining the generalizability of the underlying local inference method, we apply the idea of expectation propagation (EP) as a framework for distributed Bayesian inference. The central idea is to iteratively update approximations to the local likelihoods given the state of the other approximations and the prior. The present paper has two roles: we review the steps that are needed to keep EP algorithms numerically stable, and we suggest a general approach, inspired by EP, for approaching data partitioning problems in a way that achieves the computational benefits of parallelism while allowing each local update to make use of relevant information from the other sites. In addition, we demonstrate how the method can be applied in a hierarchical context to make use of partitioning of both data and parameters. The paper describes a general algorithmic framework, rather than a specific algorithm, and presents an example implementation for it. Aki Vehtari, Andrew Gelman, Tuomas Sivula, Pasi Jylänki, Dustin Tran, Swupnil Sahai, Paul Blomstedt, John P. Cunningham, David Schiminovich, Christian P. Robert |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 7 |
| 2019 | Scalable Bayesian Non-linear Matrix CompletionabstractMatrix completion aims to predict missing elements in a partially observed data matrix which in typical applications, such as collaborative filtering, is large and extremely sparsely observed. A standard solution is matrix factorization, which predicts unobserved entries as linear combinations of latent variables. We generalize to non-linear combinations in massive-scale matrices. Bayesian approaches have been proven beneficial in linear matrix completion, but not applied in the more general non-linear case, due to limited scalability. We introduce a Bayesian non-linear matrix completion algorithm, which is based on a recent Bayesian formulation of Gaussian process latent variable models. To solve the challenges regarding scalability and computation, we propose a data-parallel distributed computational approach with a restricted communication scheme. We evaluate our method on challenging out-of-matrix prediction tasks using both simulated and real-world data. Xiangju Qin, Paul Blomstedt, Samuel Kaski |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2019 | Embarrassingly Parallel MCMC using Deep Invertible Transformations
Diego Mesquita, Paul Blomstedt, Samuel Kaski |
UAI | 2 |
| 2019 | Distributed Bayesian matrix factorization with limited communicationabstractBayesian matrix factorization (BMF) is a powerful tool for producing low-rank representations of matrices and for predicting missing values and providing confidence intervals. Scaling up the posterior inference for massive-scale matrices is challenging and requires distributing both data and computation over many workers, making communication the main computational bottleneck. Embarrassingly parallel inference would remove the communication needed, by using completely independent computations on different data subsets, but it suffers from the inherent unidentifiability of BMF solutions. We introduce a hierarchical decomposition of the joint posterior distribution, which couples the subset inferences, allowing for embarrassingly parallel computations in a sequence of at most three stages. Using an efficient approximate implementation, we show improvements empirically on both real and simulated data. Our distributed approach is able to achieve a speed-up of almost an order of magnitude over the full posterior, with a negligible effect on predictive accuracy. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art embarrassingly parallel MCMC methods in accuracy, and achieves results competitive to other available distributed and parallel implementations of BMF. Xiangju Qin, Paul Blomstedt, Eemeli Leppäaho, Pekka Parviainen, Samuel Kaski |
Mach. Learn. | 2 |
| 2016 | Modelling-based experiment retrieval: a case study with gene expression clusteringabstractMOTIVATION: Public and private repositories of experimental data are growing to sizes that require dedicated methods for finding relevant data. To improve on the state of the art of keyword searches from annotations, methods for content-based retrieval have been proposed. In the context of gene expression experiments, most methods retrieve gene expression profiles, requiring each experiment to be expressed as a single profile, typically of case versus control. A more general, recently suggested alternative is to retrieve experiments whose models are good for modelling the query dataset. However, for very noisy and high-dimensional query data, this retrieval criterion turns out to be very noisy as well. RESULTS: We propose doing retrieval using a denoised model of the query dataset, instead of the original noisy dataset itself. To this end, we introduce a general probabilistic framework, where each experiment is modelled separately and the retrieval is done by finding related models. For retrieval of gene expression experiments, we use a probabilistic model called product partition model, which induces a clustering of genes that show similar expression patterns across a number of samples. The suggested metric for retrieval using clusterings is the normalized information distance. Empirical results finally suggest that inference for the full probabilistic model can be approximated with good performance using computationally faster heuristic clustering approaches (e.g. k-means). The method is highly scalable and straightforward to apply to construct a general-purpose gene expression experiment retrieval method. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The method can be implemented using standard clustering algorithms and normalized information distance, available in many statistical software packages. CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Paul Blomstedt, Ritabrata Dutta, Sohan Seth, Alvis Brazma, Samuel Kaski |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2015 | A Bayesian Predictive Model for Clustering Data of Mixed Discrete and Continuous TypeabstractAdvantages of model-based clustering methods over heuristic alternatives have been widely demonstrated in the literature. Most model-based clustering algorithms assume that the data are either discrete or continuous, possibly allowing both types to be present in separate features. In this paper, we introduce a model-based approach for clustering feature vectors of mixed type, allowing each feature to simultaneously take on both categorical and real values. Such data may be encountered, for instance, in chemical and biological analyses, in the analysis of survey data, as well as in image analysis. Our model is formulated within a Bayesian predictive framework, where clustering solutions correspond to random partitions of the data. Using conjugate analysis, the posterior probability for each possible partition can be determined analytically, enabling the utilization of efficient computational search strategies for finding the posterior optimal partition. The derived model is illustrated using several synthetic and real datasets. Paul Blomstedt, Jing Tang 0002, Christian Granlund, Jukka Corander |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |