Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amy Le

dblp:159/0598 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 61% Health and well-being technologies · 39%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
family dynamics
0.212015
Snack Buddy: Supporting Healthy Snacking in Low Socioeconomic Status Families · CSCW 2015
Collaborative and social computing
social computing
0.212015
Snack Buddy: Supporting Healthy Snacking in Low Socioeconomic Status Families · CSCW 2015
Health and well-being technologies › mobile health
mobile health application
0.112015
Snack Buddy: Supporting Healthy Snacking in Low Socioeconomic Status Families · CSCW 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-structured interviews · 0.2photo elicitation · 0.2field trial · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Snack Buddy: Supporting Healthy Snacking in Low Socioeconomic Status Families
abstract
We conducted a 12-week comparative field trial with 20 low socioeconomic status (SES) caregivers from 10 families to explore their use of a sociotechnical mobile application designed to promote healthy snacking, Snack Buddy. Our analysis of the semi-structured interviews, pre/post-intervention instruments, and photo-elicitation interviews suggests that participants gained a greater awareness of their own snacking practices and those of their family members. Users were empowered to adjust their own practices and beliefs around healthy eating because they were more aware of their family's snacking behaviors. We describe the unique social dynamics of how families engaged with each other and the application, which includes positive social support for healthy eating. By providing insights into family interactions and experiences with the application, we identify benefits, challenges, and strategies when designing family-level sociotechnical interventions for healthy behavior.
Christopher L. Schaefbauer, Danish Ullah Khan, Amy Le, Garrett Sczechowski, Katie A. Siek
CSCW3