Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jonathan C. Fuller
dblp:159/2564
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0001-8801-149XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
ligand binding site analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | LigDig: a web server for querying ligand-protein interactions · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis
protein-ligand interaction |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | LigDig: a web server for querying ligand-protein interactions · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | LigDig: a web server for querying ligand-protein interactions · Bioinform. 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
structure comparison · 0.2free-text search · 0.2coordinate file preparation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | LigDig: a web server for querying ligand-protein interactionsabstractUNLABELLED: LigDig is a web server designed to answer questions that previously required several independent queries to diverse data sources. It also performs basic manipulations and analyses of the structures of protein-ligand complexes. The LigDig webserver is modular in design and consists of seven tools, which can be used separately, or via linking the output from one tool to the next, in order to answer more complex questions. Currently, the tools allow a user to: (i) perform a free-text compound search, (ii) search for suitable ligands, particularly inhibitors, of a protein and query their interaction network, (iii) search for the likely function of a ligand, (iv) perform a batch search for compound identifiers, (v) find structures of protein-ligand complexes, (vi) compare three-dimensional structures of ligand binding sites and (vii) prepare coordinate files of protein-ligand complexes for further calculations. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: LigDig makes use of freely available databases, including ChEMBL, PubChem and SABIO-RK, and software programs, including cytoscape.js, PDB2PQR, ProBiS and Fconv. LigDig can be used by non-experts in bio- and chemoinformatics. LigDig is available at: http://mcm.h-its.org/ligdig. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Jonathan C. Fuller, Michael Martinez, Stefan Henrich, Antonia Stank, Stefan Richter 0002, Rebecca C. Wade |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2015 | A Quick Guide for Building a Successful Bioinformatics Communityabstract"Scientific community" refers to a group of people collaborating together on scientific-research-related activities who also share common goals, interests, and values. Such communities play a key role in many bioinformatics activities. Communities may be linked to a specific location or institute, or involve people working at many different institutions and locations. Education and training is typically an important component of these communities, providing a valuable context in which to develop skills and expertise, while also strengthening links and relationships within the community. Scientific communities facilitate: (i) the exchange and development of ideas and expertise; (ii) career development; (iii) coordinated funding activities; (iv) interactions and engagement with professionals from other fields; and (v) other activities beneficial to individual participants, communities, and the scientific field as a whole. It is thus beneficial at many different levels to understand the general features of successful, high-impact bioinformatics communities; how individual participants can contribute to the success of these communities; and the role of education and training within these communities. We present here a quick guide to building and maintaining a successful, high-impact bioinformatics community, along with an overview of the general benefits of participating in such communities. This article grew out of contributions made by organizers, presenters, panelists, and other participants of the ISMB/ECCB 2013 workshop "The 'How To Guide' for Establishing a Successful Bioinformatics Network" at the 21st Annual International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISMB) and the 12th European Conference on Computational Biology (ECCB). Aidan Budd, Manuel Corpas, Michelle D. Brazas, Jonathan C. Fuller, Jeremy Goecks, Nicola J. Mulder, Magali Michaut, B. F. Francis Ouellette, Aleksandra Pawlik, Niklas Blomberg |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 4 |
| 2015 | Ten Simple Rules for Organizing an UnconferenceabstractAn academic conference is a traditional platform for researchers and professionals to network and learn about recent developments and trends in a particular academic field [1–4]. Typically, the organizing committees and sponsors decide the main theme and sub-topics of the conference and select the presenters based on peer-reviewed papers [5]. The selected speakers usually share their research with a large audience by means of presentations and posters. However, the most stimulating discussions generally take place over coffee breaks when attendees can interact with each other and discuss various topics, including their own research interests, in a more informal manner [1, 6, 7], while expanding their own professional networks. An emphasis on facilitating such informal/networking interactions is a central focus of “unconventional conferences”—or “unconferences.” Aidan Budd, Holger Dinkel, Manuel Corpas, Jonathan C. Fuller, Laura Rubinat-Ripoll, Damien Devos, Pierre H. Khoueiry, Konrad U. Förstner, Fotis Georgatos, Francis Rowland, Malvika Sharan, Janos X. Binder, Tom Grace, Karyn Traphagen, Adam Gristwood, Natasha T. Wood |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 4 |