Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Petros Gigis

dblp:159/4596 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-2076-6287ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 7 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Security and privacy · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
6 papers
Internet architecture and protocols · 39% Routing and switching · 31% Network measurement and analytics · 13%
Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 50% Usable security · 50%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols
internet exchange point
0.822021
O Peer, Where Art Thou? Uncovering Remote Peering Interconnections at IXPs · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2021
O Peer, Where Art Thou?: Uncovering Remote Peering Interconnections at IXPs · Internet Measurement Conference 2018
Usable security › security operations › security analytics › malicious activity detection
spoofed traffic detection
0.812024
Bad Packets Come Back, Worse Ones Don't · SIGCOMM 2024
Network security
traffic analysis
0.812024
Bad Packets Come Back, Worse Ones Don't · SIGCOMM 2024
Routing and switching › inter-domain routing
BGP
0.622018
ARTEMIS: Neutralizing BGP Hijacking Within a Minute · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2018
ARTEMIS: Real-Time Detection and Automatic Mitigation for BGP Prefix Hijacking · SIGCOMM 2016
Content delivery and video streaming
content delivery network
0.512021
Seven years in the life of Hypergiants' off-nets · SIGCOMM 2021
Routing and switching › inter-domain routing › inter-domain routing security
BGP hijacking
0.312018
ARTEMIS: Neutralizing BGP Hijacking Within a Minute · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2018
Internet architecture and protocols
network security
0.312018
ARTEMIS: Neutralizing BGP Hijacking Within a Minute · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2018
Internet architecture and protocols › peering
remote peering
0.312018
O Peer, Where Art Thou?: Uncovering Remote Peering Interconnections at IXPs · Internet Measurement Conference 2018
Network management and operations › fault management
fault diagnosis
0.212016
ARTEMIS: Real-Time Detection and Automatic Mitigation for BGP Prefix Hijacking · SIGCOMM 2016
Routing and switching › inter-domain routing › BGP
prefix hijacking
0.212016
ARTEMIS: Real-Time Detection and Automatic Mitigation for BGP Prefix Hijacking · SIGCOMM 2016
Internet architecture and protocols › network topology
internet topology
0.222021
Seven years in the life of Hypergiants' off-nets · SIGCOMM 2021
O Peer, Where Art Thou?: Uncovering Remote Peering Interconnections at IXPs · Internet Measurement Conference 2018
Routing and switching
inter-domain routing
0.212024
Bad Packets Come Back, Worse Ones Don't · SIGCOMM 2024
Network measurement and analytics
internet topology measurement
0.112021
O Peer, Where Art Thou? Uncovering Remote Peering Interconnections at IXPs · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2021
Network measurement and analytics › internet measurement › routing measurement
BGP monitoring
0.112018
ARTEMIS: Neutralizing BGP Hijacking Within a Minute · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical validation · 0.5heuristic inference · 0.5measurement study · 0.3BGP monitoring · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Bad Packets Come Back, Worse Ones Don't
abstract
ISPs may notice that traffic from certain sources is entering their network at an unexpected location, but it is hard to know if this represents a problem or is just normal spoofed background noise. If such traffic is not spoofed, it would be useful to generate alerts, but alerting on background noise is not useful.
Petros Gigis, Mark Handley, Stefano Vissicchio
SIGCOMM1
2021 Towards a traffic map of the Internet Connecting the dots between popular services and users: Connecting the dots between popular services and users
abstract
The impact of Internet phenomena depends on how they impact users, but researchers lack visibility into how to translate Internet events into their impact. Distressingly, the research community seems to have lost hope of obtaining this information without relying on privileged viewpoints. We argue for optimism thanks to new network measurement methods and changes in Internet structure which make it possible to construct an "Internet traffic map". This map would identify the locations of users and major services, the paths between them, and the relative activity levels routed along these paths. We sketch our vision for the map, detail new measurement ideas for map construction, and identify key challenges that the research community should tackle. The realization of an Internet traffic map will be an Internet-scale research effort with Internet-scale impacts that reach far beyond the research community, and so we hope our fellow researchers are excited to join us in addressing this challenge.
Weifan Jiang, Petros Gigis, Kevin Vermeulen, Emile Aben, Matt Calder, Ethan Katz-Bassett, Lefteris Manassakis, Georgios Smaragdakis, Narseo Vallina-Rodriguez
HotNets4
2021 Seven years in the life of Hypergiants' off-nets
abstract
Content Hypergiants deliver the vast majority of Internet traffic to end users. In recent years, some have invested heavily in deploying services and servers inside end-user networks. With several dozen Hypergiants and thousands of servers deployed inside networks, these off-net (meaning outside the Hypergiant networks) deployments change the structure of the Internet. Previous efforts to study them have relied on proprietary data or specialized per-Hypergiant measurement techniques that neither scale nor generalize, providing a limited view of content delivery on today's Internet.
Petros Gigis, Matt Calder, Lefteris Manassakis, George Nomikos, Vasileios Kotronis, Xenofontas A. Dimitropoulos, Ethan Katz-Bassett, Georgios Smaragdakis
SIGCOMM1
2021 O Peer, Where Art Thou? Uncovering Remote Peering Interconnections at IXPs
abstract
Internet eXchange Points (IXPs) are Internet hubs that mainly provide the switching infrastructure to interconnect networks and exchange traffic. While the initial goal of IXPs was to bring together networks residing in the same city or country, and thus keep local traffic local, this model is gradually shifting. Many networks connect to IXPs without having physical presence at their switching infrastructure. This practice, called Remote Peering, is changing the Internet topology and economy, and has become the subject of a contentious debate within the network operators' community. However, despite the increasing attention it attracts, the understanding of the characteristics and impact of remote peering is limited. In this work, we introduce and validate a heuristic methodology for discovering remote peers at IXPs. We (i) identify critical remote peering inference challenges, (ii) infer remote peers with high accuracy (>97%) and coverage (94%) per IXP, and (iii) characterize different aspects of the remote peering ecosystem by applying our methodology to 30 large IXPs. We observe that remote peering is a significantly common practice in all the studied IXPs; for the largest IXPs, remote peers account for 40% of their member base. We also show that today, IXP growth is mainly driven by remote peering, which contributes two times more than local peering.
Vasileios Giotsas, George Nomikos, Vasileios Kotronis, Pavlos Sermpezis, Petros Gigis, Lefteris Manassakis, Christoph Dietzel, Stavros Konstantaras, Xenofontas A. Dimitropoulos
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.5
2020 A First Look at the Misuse and Abuse of the IPv4 Transfer Market
Vasileios Giotsas, Ioana Livadariu, Petros Gigis
PAM3
2018 O Peer, Where Art Thou?: Uncovering Remote Peering Interconnections at IXPs
George Nomikos, Vasileios Kotronis, Pavlos Sermpezis, Petros Gigis, Lefteris Manassakis, Christoph Dietzel, Stavros Konstantaras, Xenofontas A. Dimitropoulos, Vasileios Giotsas
Internet Measurement Conference4
2018 ARTEMIS: Neutralizing BGP Hijacking Within a Minute
abstract
Border gateway protocol (BGP) prefix hijacking is a critical threat to Internet organizations and users. Despite the availability of several defense approaches (ranging from RPKI to popular third-party services), none of them solves the problem adequately in practice. In fact, they suffer from: (i) lack of detection comprehensiveness, allowing sophisticated attackers to evade detection; (ii) limited accuracy, especially in the case of third-party detection; (iii) delayed verification and mitigation of incidents, reaching up to days; and (iv) lack of privacy and of flexibility in post-hijack counteractions, on the side of network operators. In this paper, we propose ARTEMIS, a defense approach (a) based on accurate and fast detection operated by the autonomous system itself, leveraging the pervasiveness of publicly available BGP monitoring services and their recent shift towards real-time streaming and thus (b) enabling flexible and fast mitigation of hijacking events. Compared to the previous work, our approach combines characteristics desirable to network operators, such as comprehensiveness, accuracy, speed, privacy, and flexibility. Finally, we show through real-world experiments that with the ARTEMIS approach, prefix hijacking can be neutralized within a minute.
Pavlos Sermpezis, Vasileios Kotronis, Petros Gigis, Xenofontas A. Dimitropoulos, Danilo Cicalese, Alistair King, Alberto Dainotti
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.3
2016 ARTEMIS: Real-Time Detection and Automatic Mitigation for BGP Prefix Hijacking
abstract
Prefix hijacking is a common phenomenon in the Internet that often causes routing problems and economic losses. In this demo, we propose ARTEMIS, a tool that enables network administrators to detect and mitigate prefix hijacking incidents, against their own prefixes. ARTEMIS is based on the real-time monitoring of BGP data in the Internet, and software-defined networking (SDN) principles, and can completely mitigate a prefix hijacking within a few minutes (e.g., 5-6mins in our experiments) after it has been~launched.
Gavriil Chaviaras, Petros Gigis, Pavlos Sermpezis, Xenofontas A. Dimitropoulos
SIGCOMM2
2015 Transparent Estimation of Internet Penetration from Network Observations
Suso Benitez-Baleato, Nils B. Weidmann, Petros Gigis, Xenofontas A. Dimitropoulos, Eduard Glatz, Brian Trammell
PAM3