In peer-to-peer overlay or video broadcast, peers contribute a portion of the bandwidth to the overlay in return or the service. In the presence of network heterogeneity, it is not well understood how much bandwidth peers should contribute and receive in return. Existing protocols implicitly assume peers are either completely altruistic (which leads to airness concerns) or completely selfish (which leads to sub-optimal performance). In this paper, we argue that altruism should be explicitly considered. We propose a policy framework in which a wide range of altruism can be modeled and parameterized. The key findings are (i) the level of altruism has significant implication on the overall performance of the receivers; even a small degree of altruism goes a long way in improving their performance, and (ii) a wide range of altruism policy can be implemented efficiently in a distributed fashion. We validate these claims using simulation, with traces from real Internet broadcast events.

Measurement-based optimization is one important strategy to improve the performance of bandwidth-demanding peer-to-peer systems. However, to date, we have little quantitative knowledge of how well basic lightweight measurement-based techniques such as RTT probing, 10KB TCP probing, and bottleneck bandwidth probing may work in practice in the peer-to-peer environment. By conducting trace-based analyses, we find that the basic techniques can help achieve 40 to 50% optimal performance. To deepen our understanding, we analyze some of the intrinsic properties of these techniques. Our analyses reveal the inherent difficulty of the peer selection problem due to the extreme heterogeneity in the peer-to-peer environment, and that the basic techniques are limited because their primary strength lies in eliminating the low-performance peers rather than reliably identifying the best-performing one. However, our analyses also reveal two key insights that can potentially be exploited by applications. First, for adaptive applications that can continuously change communication peers, the basic techniques are highly effective in guiding the adaption process. In our experiments, typically an 80% optimal peer can be found by trying less than 5 candidates. Secondly, we find that the basic techniques are highly complementary and can potentially be combined to better identify a high-performance peer, thus even applications that cannot adapt may benefit. Using media file sharing and overlay multicast streaming as case studies, we have systematically experimented with several simple combined peer selection techniques. Our results show that for the nonadaptive media file sharing application, a simple combined technique can boost performance to 60% optimal. In contrast, for the continuously adaptive overlay multicast application, we find that a basic technique with even low-fidelity network information is sufficient to ensure good performance. We believe our findings will help guide the future designs of high-performance peer-to-peer systems.

The conventional wisdom has been that Internet protocol (IP) is the natural protocol layer for implementing multicast related functionality. However, more than a decade after its initial proposal, IP multicast is still plagued with concerns pertaining to scalability, network management, deployment, and support for higher layer functionality such as error, flow, and congestion control. We explore an alternative architecture that we term end system multicast, where end systems implement all multicast related functionality including membership management and packet replication. This shifting of multicast support from routers to end systems has the potential to address most problems associated with IP multicast. However, the key concern is the performance penalty associated with such a model. In particular, end system multicast introduces duplicate packets on physical links and incurs larger end-to-end delays than IP multicast. We study these performance concerns in the context of the Narada protocol. In Narada, end systems self-organize into an overlay structure using a fully distributed protocol. Further, end systems attempt to optimize the efficiency of the overlay by adapting to network dynamics and by considering application level performance. We present details of Narada and evaluate it using both simulation and Internet experiments. Our results indicate that the performance penalties are low both from the application and the network perspectives. We believe the potential benefits of transferring multicast functionality from end systems to routers significantly outweigh the performance penalty incurred.

The conventional wisdom has been that IP is the natural protocol layer for implementing multicast related functionality. However, ten years after its initial proposal, IP Multicast is still plagued with concerns pertaining to scalability, network management, deployment and support for higher layer functionality such as error, flow and congestion control. In this paper, we explore an alternative architecture for small and sparse groups, where end systems implement all multicast related functionality including membership management and packet replication. We call such a scheme End System Multicast. This shifting of multicast support from routers to end systems has the potential to address most problems associated with IP Multicast. However, the key concern is the performance penalty associated with such a model. In particular, End System Multicast introduces duplicate packets on physical links and incurs larger end-to-end delay than IP Multicast. In this paper, we study this question in the context of the Narada protocol. In Narada, end systems self-organize into an overlay structure using a fully distributed protocol. In addition, Narada attempts to optimize the efficiency of the overlay based on end-to-end measurements. We present details of Narada and evaluate it using both simulation and Internet experiments. Preliminary results are encouraging. In most simulations and Internet experiments, the delay and bandwidth penalty are low. We believe the potential benefits of repartitioning multicast functionality between end systems and routers significantly outweigh the performance penalty incurred.