Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chin Pei Tang

dblp:16/5563 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 61% Robot manipulation · 38% Legged, aerial and field robots · 1%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › cooperative manipulation
cooperative grasping
0.112012
Analysis framework for cooperating mobile cable robots · ICRA 2012
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping
multifingered grasping
0.112012
Analysis framework for cooperating mobile cable robots · ICRA 2012
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.112010
Enhanced trajectory tracking control with active lower bounded stiffness control for cable robot · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › impedance control
stiffness control
0.112010
Enhanced trajectory tracking control with active lower bounded stiffness control for cable robot · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
trajectory tracking
0.112010
Enhanced trajectory tracking control with active lower bounded stiffness control for cable robot · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Robot manipulation › cooperative manipulation
cooperative object transport
0.012004
Decentralized Kinematic Control of Payload by a System of Mobile Manipulators · ICRA 2004
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › multi-robot control
decentralized control
0.012004
Decentralized Kinematic Control of Payload by a System of Mobile Manipulators · ICRA 2004
Robotics › Robot manipulation
mobile manipulation
0.012004
Decentralized Kinematic Control of Payload by a System of Mobile Manipulators · ICRA 2004
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.012004
Geometric Motion Planning and Formation Optimization for a Fleet of Nonholonomic Wheeled Mobile Robots · ICRA 2004
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
multi-robot planning
0.012004
Geometric Motion Planning and Formation Optimization for a Fleet of Nonholonomic Wheeled Mobile Robots · ICRA 2004
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
nonholonomic motion planning
0.012004
Geometric Motion Planning and Formation Optimization for a Fleet of Nonholonomic Wheeled Mobile Robots · ICRA 2004
Robotics › Robot manipulation › parallel manipulator
cable-driven parallel robot
0.012010
Enhanced trajectory tracking control with active lower bounded stiffness control for cable robot · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
wheeled mobile robot
0.012004
Decentralized Kinematic Control of Payload by a System of Mobile Manipulators · ICRA 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

redundancy analysis · 0.1generalized modeling framework · 0.1redundancy resolution · 0.1co-simulation · 0.1performance metrics · 0.0kinematic control · 0.0hierarchical control · 0.0geometric motion planning · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Analysis framework for cooperating mobile cable robots
abstract
Cable robots form a class of parallel architecture robots with significant benefits including simplicity of construction, large workspace, significant payload capacity and end effector stiffness. While conventional cable robots have fixed bases, we seek to explore inclusion of mobility into the bases (in the form of gantries, and/or vehicle bases) which can significantly further enhance the capabilities of cable robots. However, this also introduces redundancy and complexity into the system which needs to be carefully analyzed and resolved. To this end, we propose a generalized modeling framework for systematic design and analysis of cooperative mobile cable robots, building upon knowledge base of multi-fingered grasping, and illustrate it with a case study of four cooperating gantry mounted cable robots transporting a planar payload.
Chin Pei Tang, Venkat N. Krovi
ICRA2
2010 Enhanced trajectory tracking control with active lower bounded stiffness control for cable robot
abstract
Cable robots have seen considerable recent interest ensuing from their ability to combine a large workspace with significant payload capacity. However, the cables can apply forces to the end-effector only when they are in tension, and thus form a subclass of control problems requiring unilateral control inputs. Furthermore, actuation redundancy occurs when surplus cables are introduced within the system. On one hand, such redundancy needs to be carefully resolved for accurate tracking of the task. On the other hand, it allows the redistribution of the actuation forces to satisfy some secondary criteria. In this paper, we apply such redundancy for enhanced trajectory tracking by actively controlling the task stiffness of the end-effector. The scheme allow us to specify a lower bound of the task stiffness, which is intended to provide improved trajectory tracking and disturbance rejection performance. Finally, we illustrate the improved control performance within a virtual prototype cosimulation framework.
Leng-Feng Lee, Chin Pei Tang, Venkat N. Krovi
ICRA3
2004 Geometric Motion Planning and Formation Optimization for a Fleet of Nonholonomic Wheeled Mobile Robots
abstract
In this paper, we present a geometric method for motion planning for a fleet of differentially-driven wheeled mobile robots moving in formation, which explicitly takes into account their nonholonomic constraints. The relative position within the formation induces different motion plans for each individual wheeled mobile robot (WMR). We can quantitatively evaluate the performance of such induced motion plans using suitable metrics defined for the motions of each WMR. These performance metrics in cumulative form or individual form are used to optimize the overall formation (i.e., their relative positions) for performing a given task. The approach is well suited for online implementation and is demonstrated using case studies.
Rajankumar Bhatt, Chin Pei Tang, Venkat N. Krovi
ICRA2
2004 Decentralized Kinematic Control of Payload by a System of Mobile Manipulators
abstract
In this paper, we examine creation of a decentralized kinematic control scheme for a composite system of two (or more) wheeled mobile manipulators that can team up to cooperatively transport a common payload. Each mobile manipulator module consists of a differentially driven wheeled mobile robot (WMR) with a mounted planar two-degree-of-freedom (d.o.f) manipulator. A composite multi-degree-of-freedom system is formed when a payload is placed at the end effectors of multiple such modules with significant advantages. However, the nonholonomic/holonomic constraints and active/passive components within the composite vehicle need careful treatment for realizing the payload transport task. Hence, we first verify that arbitrary desired end-effector motions can be accommodated, within the feasible motion distributions of the articulations and the wheeled base. Then, we develop motion-plans by which this desired end-effector motion could be actively realized, using only the limited active motion-distribution of the differentially driven wheels. Finally, we deploy this in the form of a two-level hierarchical control framework, with an upper-level planning of the steerable active vector-fields and a lower-level posture stabilization control of the individual WMRs. Preliminary experimental results from the decentralized-control implementation for a two-module composite vehicle are also presented.
Chin Pei Tang, Rajankumar Bhatt, Venkat N. Krovi
ICRA1