Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Olaf Frandsen-Thorlacius

dblp:16/907 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 77% User interface design and tools · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Usability and user experience research › usability engineering
cross-cultural usability
0.112009
Non-universal usability?: a survey of how usability is understood by Chinese and Danish users · CHI 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Non-universal usability?: a survey of how usability is understood by Chinese and Danish users
abstract
Most research assumes that usability is understood similarly by users in different cultures, implying that the notion of usability, its aspects, and their interrelations are constant across cultures. The present study shows that this is not the case for a sample of 412 users from China and Denmark, who differ in how they understand and prioritize different aspects of usability. Chinese users appear to be more concerned with visual appearance, satisfaction, and fun than Danish users; Danish users prioritize effectiveness, efficiency, and lack of frustration higher than Chinese users. The results suggest that culture influences perceptions of usability. We discuss implications for usability research and for usability practice.
Olaf Frandsen-Thorlacius, Kasper Hornbæk, Morten Hertzum, Torkil Clemmensen
CHI1