This paper investigates the problem of integrating two powerful abstractions for concurrent programming, namely futures and transactional memory. Our focus is on specifying the semantics of execution of "transactional futures", i.e., futures that execute as atomic transactions and that are spawned/evaluated by other (plain) transactions or transactional futures. We show that, due to the ability of futures to generate parallel computations with complex dependencies, there exist several plausible (i.e., intuitive) alternatives for defining the isolation and atomicity semantics of transactional futures. The alternative semantics we propose explore different trade-offs between ease of use and efficiency. We have implemented the proposed semantics by introducing a graph-based software transactional memory algorithm, which we integrated with a state of the art JAVA-based Software Transactional Memory (STM). We quantify the performance trade-offs associated with the different semantics using an extensive experimental study encompassing a wide range of diverse workloads.

This paper addresses the problem of self-tuning the parallelism degree in Transactional Memory (TM) systems that support parallel nesting (PN-TM). This problem has been long investigated for TMs not supporting nesting, but, to the best of our knowledge, has never been studied in the context of PN-TMs. Indeed, the problem complexity is inherently exacerbated in PN-TMs, since these require to identify the optimal parallelism degree not only for top-level transactions but also for nested sub-transactions. The increase of the problem dimensionality raises new challenges (e.g., increase of the search space, and proneness to suffer from local maxima), which are unsatisfactorily addressed by self-tuning solutions conceived for flat nesting TMs. We tackle these challenges by proposing AUTOPN, an on-line self-tuning system that combines model-driven learning techniques with localized search heuristics in order to pursue a twofold goal: i) enhance convergence speed by identifying the most promising region of the search space via model-driven techniques, while ii) increasing robustness against modeling errors, via a final local search phase aimed at refining the model's prediction. We further address the problem of tuning the duration of the monitoring windows used to collect feedback on the system's performance, by introducing novel, domain-specific, mechanisms aimed to strike an optimal trade-off between latency and accuracy of the self-tuning process. We integrated AUTOPN with a state of the art PN-TM (JVSTM) and evaluated it via an extensive experimental study. The results of this study highlight that AUTOPN can achieve gains of up to 45× in terms of increased accuracy and 4× faster convergence speed, when compared with several on-line optimization techniques (gradient descent, simulated annealing and genetic algorithm), some of which were already successfully used in the context of flat nesting TMs.

This work investigates how to combine two powerful abstractions to manage concurrent programming: Transactional Memory (TM) and futures. The former hides from programmers the complexity of synchronizing concurrent access to shared data, via the familiar abstraction of atomic transactions. The latter serves to schedule and synchronize the parallel execution of computations whose results are not immediately required. While TM and futures are two widely investigated topics, the problem of how to exploit these two abstractions in synergy is still largely unexplored in the literature. This paper fills this gap by introducing Java Transactional Futures (JTF), a Java-based TM implementation that allows programmers to use futures to coordinate the execution of parallel tasks, while leveraging transactions to synchronize accesses to shared data. JTF provides a simple and intuitive semantic regarding the admissible serialization orders of the futures spawned by transactions, by ensuring that the results produced by a future are always consistent with those that one would obtain by executing the future sequentially. Our experimental results show that the use of futures in a TM allows not only to unlock parallelism within transactions, but also to reduce the cost of conflicts among top-level transactions in high contention workloads.