Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dennis J. F. Heck

dblp:160/8388 · also D. J. F. Heck · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 50% Haptics and multimodal interaction · 50%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › teleoperation
bilateral teleoperation
0.312018
Direct Force-Reflecting Two-Layer Approach for Passive Bilateral Teleoperation With Time Delays · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Haptics and multimodal interaction › haptic teleoperation
force-reflecting teleoperation
0.312018
Direct Force-Reflecting Two-Layer Approach for Passive Bilateral Teleoperation With Time Delays · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Haptics and multimodal interaction
passivity-based control
0.312018
Direct Force-Reflecting Two-Layer Approach for Passive Bilateral Teleoperation With Time Delays · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Human-robot interaction
teleoperation
0.312018
Direct Force-Reflecting Two-Layer Approach for Passive Bilateral Teleoperation With Time Delays · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.112018
Direct Force-Reflecting Two-Layer Approach for Passive Bilateral Teleoperation With Time Delays · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › teleoperation
time-delay compensation
0.112018
Direct Force-Reflecting Two-Layer Approach for Passive Bilateral Teleoperation With Time Delays · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

two-layer control architecture · 0.7passivity layer · 0.7energy duplication · 0.7damping injection · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Direct Force-Reflecting Two-Layer Approach for Passive Bilateral Teleoperation With Time Delays
abstract
We propose a two-layer control architecture for bilateral teleoperation with communication delays. The controller is structured with an (inner) performance layer and an (outer) passivity layer. In the performance layer, any traditional controller for bilateral teleoperation can be implemented. The passivity layer guarantees that, from the operator and environment perspective, the overall teleoperator is passive: The amount of energy that can be extracted from the teleoperator is bounded from below and the rate of increase of the stored energy in the teleoperator is bounded by (twice) the environment and operator supplied power. Passivity is ensured by modulating the performance layer outputs and by injecting a variable amount of damping via an energy-based logic that follows the innovative principle of energy duplication and takes into account the detrimental effects of time delays. In contrast to the traditional teleoperation approach, in which the master and slave controllers implement an as-stiff-as-possible coupling between the master and slave devices, our scheme is specifically designed for direct force-reflecting bilateral teleoperation: The slave controller mimics the operator action, whereas the master controller reflects the slave-environment interaction. We illustrate the performance of the two-layer approach in a challenging experiment with a round-trip communication delay of 300 ms while making and breaking contact with a stiff aluminum environment. Finally, we also compare our controller with the state of the art.
Dennis J. F. Heck, Alessandro Saccon, Ruud Beerens, Henk Nijmeijer
IEEE Trans. Robotics1
2016 Evaluation of Haptic and Visual Cues for Repulsive or Attractive Guidance in Nonholonomic Steering Tasks
abstract
Remote control of vehicles is a difficult task for operators. Support systems that present additional task information may assist operators, but their usefulness is expected to depend on several factors such as 1) the nature of conveyed information, 2) what modality it is conveyed through, and 3) the task difficulty. In an exploratory experiment, these three factors were manipulated to quantify their effects on operator behavior. Subjects ( n = 15 ) used a haptic manipulator to steer a virtual nonholonomic vehicle through abstract environments, in which obstacles needed to be avoided. Both a simple support conveying near-future predictions of the trajectory of the vehicle and a more elaborate support that continuously suggests the path to be taken were designed (factor 1). These types of information were offered either with visual or haptic cues (factor 2). These four support systems were tested in four different abstracted environments with decreasing amount of allowed variability in realized trajectories (factor 3). The results show improvements for the simple support only when this information was presented visually, but not when offered haptically. For the elaborate support, equally large improvements for both modalities were found. This suggests that the elaborate support is better: additional information is key in improving performance in nonholonomic steering tasks.
Roel J. Kuiper, Dennis J. F. Heck, Irene A. Kuling, David A. Abbink
IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst.2
2015 The effect of damping on the perception of hardness
abstract
In controlling teleoperation systems subject to communication delays, unstable behavior is often prevented by injecting damping. A proper perception of hardness is required to efficiently interact with an object, but it is unknown if and how this injected damping influences the perceived hardness of objects. To investigate the effect of damping on the perceived hardness of an object, 12 participants compared the hardnesses of lightly and heavily damped objects in a two-alternative forced choice experiment. Two tasks were investigated: an in-contact and a contact-transition task. For each task, 3 reference stiffnesses were used. Both force and position data were recorded. The results show that adding damping increases the perceived hardness of an object for an in-contact task, while it decreases perceived hardness for a contact-transition task. Movement and force data show that object indentation, mean and maximum velocity and adjusted rate-hardness, a new parameter defined in this paper, correlate with perceived object hardness. From a fundamental perspective, the results show that perceived hardness is influenced by damping in a task-specific way. Moreover, for designers of teleoperation systems the results provide insights for tuning and designing control architectures that properly reflect the desired hardness.
Femke E. van Beek, Dennis J. F. Heck, Henk Nijmeijer, Wouter M. Bergmann Tiest, Astrid M. L. Kappers
World Haptics2