Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aastha Mehta
dblp:161/0164
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-3416-5254ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 7 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
8 papers |
Hardware security and side channels · 32% Privacy and data protection · 24% Network security · 22% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 83% Storage systems · 17% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack
ciphertext side-channel |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Relocate-Vote: Using Sparsity Information to Exploit Ciphertext Side-Channels · USENIX Security Symposium 2025 |
Network security › traffic analysis
data flow tracking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Growlithe: A Developer-Centric Compliance Tool for Serverless Applications · SP 2025 |
Systems and software security
information flow control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Growlithe: A Developer-Centric Compliance Tool for Serverless Applications · SP 2025 |
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Relocate-Vote: Using Sparsity Information to Exploit Ciphertext Side-Channels · USENIX Security Symposium 2025 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
serverless computing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Growlithe: A Developer-Centric Compliance Tool for Serverless Applications · SP 2025 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | NetShaper: A Differentially Private Network Side-Channel Mitigation System · USENIX Security Symposium 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
policy compliance |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Qapla: Policy compliance for database-backed systems · USENIX Security Symposium 2017 Thoth: Comprehensive Policy Compliance in Data Retrieval Systems · USENIX Security Symposium 2016 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
homomorphic encryption |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Relocate-Vote: Using Sparsity Information to Exploit Ciphertext Side-Channels · USENIX Security Symposium 2025 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving machine learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Oblivious Multi-Party Machine Learning on Trusted Processors · USENIX Security Symposium 2016 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Oblivious Multi-Party Machine Learning on Trusted Processors · USENIX Security Symposium 2016 |
Hardware security and side channels
side channel |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | NetShaper: A Differentially Private Network Side-Channel Mitigation System · USENIX Security Symposium 2024 |
Storage systems
storage reliability |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Guardat: enforcing data policies at the storage layer · EuroSys 2015 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud security |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Pacer: Comprehensive Network Side-Channel Mitigation in the Cloud · USENIX Security Symposium 2022 |
Database system architecture and tuning
database security |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Qapla: Policy compliance for database-backed systems · USENIX Security Symposium 2017 |
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Oblivious Multi-Party Machine Learning on Trusted Processors · USENIX Security Symposium 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
static analysis · 1.7runtime enforcement · 1.7sparsity exploitation · 0.9differential privacy · 0.8policy enforcement · 0.6policy compliance · 0.5i/o mediation · 0.4cryptographic attestation · 0.4trusted processors · 0.2oblivious computation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Comparing Isolation Mechanisms with OSmosisabstractThere exist many mechanisms, ranging from processes to virtual machines, for isolating untrusted computations from each other. Each mechanism explicitly isolates certain resources while, either implicitly or explicitly, sharing the rest. Unfortunately, we lack a comprehensive way to formally and systematically reason about which resources are shared, to what extent they are shared, and how this sharing determines the degree of isolation between any two computations. Sidhartha Agrawal, Shaurya Patel, Arya Stevinson, Ilias Karimalis, Hugo Lefeuvre, Aastha Mehta, Reto Achermann, Margo I. Seltzer |
PLOS@SOSP | 7 |
| 2025 | Growlithe: A Developer-Centric Compliance Tool for Serverless ApplicationsabstractServerless applications consist of functions written in heterogeneous programming languages, use diverse data stores and communication services, and evolve rapidly. Consequently, it is challenging for serverless tenants to protect their application data from inadvertent leaks due to bugs, misconfigurations, and human errors. Cloud security tools, such as Identity and Access Management (IAM), lack observability into a tenant's application, whereas the state-of-the-art dataflow tracking tools require support from the cloud platform and incur significant runtime overheads. We present Growlithe, a tool that integrates with the serverless application development toolchain and enables continuous compliance with data policies by design. Growlithe allows declarative specification of access and data flow control policies over a language- and platform-independent dataflow graph abstraction of a serverless application, and enforces these policies through a combination of static analysis and runtime enforcement. We used Growlithe with applications using Python and JavaScript functions that can be hosted on AWS Lambda and Google Cloud Functions platforms. We empirically demonstrate that Growlithe is cross-cutting, portable and efficient, and enables developers to easily adapt their application and policies to evolving requirements. Arshia Moghimi, Devam Sisodraker, Mohammad Shahrad, Aastha Mehta |
SP | 5 |
| 2025 | Relocate-Vote: Using Sparsity Information to Exploit Ciphertext Side-Channels
Yuqin Yan, Wei Huang 0027, Ilya Grishchenko, Gururaj Saileshwar, Aastha Mehta, David Lie |
USENIX Security Symposium | 5 |
| 2024 | NetShaper: A Differentially Private Network Side-Channel Mitigation System
Amir Sabzi, Rut Vora, Swati Goswami, Margo I. Seltzer, Mathias Lécuyer, Aastha Mehta |
USENIX Security Symposium | 6 |
| 2022 | Pacer: Comprehensive Network Side-Channel Mitigation in the Cloud
Aastha Mehta, Mohamed Alzayat, Roberta De Viti, Björn B. Brandenburg, Peter Druschel, Deepak Garg 0001 |
USENIX Security Symposium | 1 |
| 2017 | Qapla: Policy compliance for database-backed systems
Aastha Mehta, Eslam Elnikety, Katura Harvey, Deepak Garg 0001, Peter Druschel |
USENIX Security Symposium | 1 |
| 2016 | Thoth: Comprehensive Policy Compliance in Data Retrieval Systems
Eslam Elnikety, Aastha Mehta, Anjo Vahldiek-Oberwagner, Deepak Garg 0001, Peter Druschel |
USENIX Security Symposium | 2 |
| 2016 | Oblivious Multi-Party Machine Learning on Trusted Processors
Olga Ohrimenko, Felix Schuster, Cédric Fournet, Aastha Mehta, Sebastian Nowozin, Kapil Vaswani, Manuel Costa |
USENIX Security Symposium | 4 |
| 2015 | Guardat: enforcing data policies at the storage layerabstractIn today's data processing systems, both the policies protecting stored data and the mechanisms for their enforcement are spread over many software components and configuration files, increasing the risk of policy violation due to bugs, vulnerabilities and misconfigurations. Guardat addresses this problem. Users, developers and administrators specify file protection policies declaratively, concisely and separate from code, and Guardat enforces these policies by mediating I/O in the storage layer. Policy enforcement relies only on the integrity of the Guardat controller and any external policy dependencies. The semantic gap between the storage layer enforcement and per-file policies is bridged using cryptographic attestations from Guardat. We present the design and prototype implementation of Guardat, enforce example policies in a Web server, and show experimentally that its overhead is low. Anjo Vahldiek-Oberwagner, Eslam Elnikety, Aastha Mehta, Deepak Garg 0001, Peter Druschel, Rodrigo Rodrigues 0001, Johannes Gehrke, Ansley Post |
EuroSys | 3 |