Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amy Spiegel

dblp:161/3227 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0001-9179-7964ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Learning and educational technologies · 56% Collaborative and social computing · 44%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Learning and educational technologies › informal learning
museum exhibits
0.212015
Fluid Grouping: Quantifying Group Engagement around Interactive Tabletop Exhibits in the Wild · CHI 2015
Learning and educational technologies › STEM education
science learning
0.112015
Fluid Grouping: Quantifying Group Engagement around Interactive Tabletop Exhibits in the Wild · CHI 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

video study · 0.2statistical analysis · 0.2shadowing · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Fluid Grouping: Quantifying Group Engagement around Interactive Tabletop Exhibits in the Wild
abstract
Interactive surfaces are increasingly common in museums and other informal learning environments where they are seen as a medium for promoting social engagement. However, despite their increasing prevalence, we know very little about factors that contribute to collaboration and learning around interactive surfaces. In this paper we present analyses of visitor engagement around several multi-touch tabletop science exhibits. Observations of 629 visitors were collected through two widely used techniques: video study and shadowing. We make four contributions: 1) we present an algorithm for identifying groups within a dynamic flow of visitors through an exhibit hall; 2) we present measures of group-level engagement along with methods for statistically analyzing these measures; 3) we assess the effect of observational techniques on visitors' engagement, demonstrating that consented video studies do not necessarily reflect visitor behavior in more naturalistic circumstances; and 4) we present an analysis showing that groups of two, groups with both children and adults, and groups that take turns spend longer at the exhibits and engage more with scientific concepts.
Florian Block, James Hammerman, Michael S. Horn, Amy Spiegel, Jonathan Christiansen, Brenda Caldwell Phillips, Judy Diamond, E. Margaret Evans, Chia Shen
CHI4