Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shrestha Ghosh

dblp:162/0846 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-1711-0500ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers
Knowledge graphs · 42% Information retrieval · 33% Data models and query languages · 14%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 33% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 24% Information extraction and text analysis · 24%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction
1.012026
GPTKB v1.5: A Massive Knowledge Base for Exploring Factual LLM Knowledge · AAAI 2026
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph querying
1.012026
GPTKB v1.5: A Massive Knowledge Base for Exploring Factual LLM Knowledge · AAAI 2026
Data models and query languages › RDF query language
SPARQL
1.012026
GPTKB v1.5: A Massive Knowledge Base for Exploring Factual LLM Knowledge · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
joint entity and relation extraction
0.912025
Enabling LLM Knowledge Analysis via Extensive Materialization · ACL (1) 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
knowledge base construction
0.912025
Enabling LLM Knowledge Analysis via Extensive Materialization · ACL (1) 2025
Query processing and optimization › aggregate query processing
count query
0.612022
Answering Count Queries with Explanatory Evidence · SIGIR 2022
Information retrieval › interactive information retrieval
explainable search
0.612022
Answering Count Queries with Explanatory Evidence · SIGIR 2022
Information retrieval
question answering
0.612022
Answering Count Queries with Explanatory Evidence · SIGIR 2022
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph quality
knowledge base completeness
0.512021
On the Limits of Machine Knowledge: Completeness, Recall and Negation in Web-scale Knowledge Bases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021
Information retrieval › retrieval evaluation
recall estimation
0.512021
On the Limits of Machine Knowledge: Completeness, Recall and Negation in Web-scale Knowledge Bases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › knowledge in language models
factual knowledge in language models
0.312026
GPTKB v1.5: A Massive Knowledge Base for Exploring Factual LLM Knowledge · AAAI 2026
Database theory
query answering
0.212022
Answering Count Queries with Explanatory Evidence · SIGIR 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

massive-recursive LLM knowledge materialization · 2.0distribution-aware prediction · 1.3statistical patterns · 1.0result consolidation · 0.9recursive querying · 0.9inference · 0.6contextualization · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 GPTKB v1.5: A Massive Knowledge Base for Exploring Factual LLM Knowledge
abstract
Language models are powerful artifacts, yet their factual knowledge is still poorly understood, and inaccessible to ad-hoc browsing and scalable statistical analysis. This demonstration introduces GPTKB v1.5, a densely interlinked 100-million-triple knowledge base (KB) built for $14,000 from GPT-4.1, using the GPTKB methodology for massive-recursive LLM knowledge materialization. This demo focuses on three use cases: (1) link-traversal-based LLM knowledge exploration, (2) SPARQL-based structured LLM knowledge querying, (3) comparative exploration of the strengths and weaknesses of LLM knowledge. Massive-recursive LLM knowledge materialization is a groundbreaking opportunity both for the systematic analysis of LLM knowledge, as well as for automated KB construction.
Tuan-Phong Nguyen, Shrestha Ghosh, Simon Razniewski
AAAI3
2025 Enabling LLM Knowledge Analysis via Extensive Materialization
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have majorly advanced NLP and AI, and next to their ability to perform a wide range of procedural tasks, a major success factor is their internalized factual knowledge.Since Petroni et al. (2019), analyzing this knowledge has gained attention.However, most approaches investigate one question at a time via modest-sized pre-defined samples, introducing an "availability bias" (Tversky and Kahneman, 1973) that prevents the analysis of knowledge (or beliefs) of LLMs beyond the experimenter's predisposition.To address this challenge, we propose a novel methodology to comprehensively materialize an LLM's factual knowledge through recursive querying and result consolidation.Our approach is a milestone for LLM research, for the first time providing constructive insights into the scope and structure of LLM knowledge (or beliefs).As a prototype, we extract a knowledge base (KB) comprising 101 million relational triples for over 2.9 million entities from GPT-4o-mini.We use this KB to exemplarily analyze GPT-4o-mini's factual knowledge in terms of scale, accuracy, bias, cutoff and consistency, at the same time.Our resource is accessible at https://gptkb.org.
Tuan-Phong Nguyen, Shrestha Ghosh, Simon Razniewski
ACL (1)3
2023 CoQEx: Entity Counts Explained
abstract
For open-domain question answering, queries on entity counts, such ashow many languages are spoken in Indonesia, are challenging. Such queries can be answered through succinct contexts with counts:estimated 700 languages, and instances:Javanese and Sundanese. Answer candidates naturally give rise to a distribution, where count contexts denoting the queried entity counts and their semantic subgroups often coexist, while the instances ground the counts in their constituting entities. In this demo we showcase the CoQEx methodology (Count Queries Explained) [5,6], which aggregates and structures explanatory evidence across search snippets, for answering user queries related to entity counts [4]. Given a entity count query, our system CoQEx retrieves search-snippets and provides the user with a distribution-aware prediction prediction, categorizes the count contexts into semantic groups and ranks instances grounding the counts, all in real-time. Our demo can be accessed athttps://nlcounqer.mpi-inf.mpg.de/.
Shrestha Ghosh, Simon Razniewski, Gerhard Weikum
WSDM1
2023 Answering Count Questions with Structured Answers from Text
Shrestha Ghosh, Simon Razniewski, Gerhard Weikum
J. Web Semant.1
2022 Answering Count Queries with Explanatory Evidence
abstract
A challenging case in web search and question answering are count queries, such as"number of songs by John Lennon''. Prior methods merely answer these with a single, and sometimes puzzling number or return a ranked list of text snippets with different numbers. This paper proposes a methodology for answering count queries with inference, contextualization and explanatory evidence. Unlike previous systems, our method infers final answers from multiple observations, supports semantic qualifiers for the counts, and provides evidence by enumerating representative instances. Experiments with a wide variety of queries show the benefits of our method. To promote further research on this underexplored topic, we release an annotated dataset of 5k queries with 200k relevant text spans.
Shrestha Ghosh, Simon Razniewski, Gerhard Weikum
SIGIR1
2021 On the Limits of Machine Knowledge: Completeness, Recall and Negation in Web-scale Knowledge Bases
abstract
General-purpose knowledge bases (KBs) are an important component of several data-driven applications. Pragmatically constructed from available web sources, these KBs are far from complete, which poses a set of challenges in curation as well as consumption. In this tutorial we discuss how completeness, recall and negation in DBs and KBs can be represented, extracted, and inferred. We proceed in 5 parts: (i) We introduce the logical foundations of knowledge representation and querying under partial closed-world semantics. (ii) We show how information about recall can be identified in KBs and in text, and (iii) how it can be estimated via statistical patterns. (iv) We show how interesting negative statements can be identified, and (v) how recall can be targeted in a comparative notion.
Simon Razniewski, Hiba Arnaout, Shrestha Ghosh, Fabian M. Suchanek
Proc. VLDB Endow.3
2020 Uncovering hidden semantics of set information in knowledge bases
Shrestha Ghosh, Simon Razniewski, Gerhard Weikum
J. Web Semant.1
2017 A Novel Resource Allocation and Power Control Mechanism for Hybrid Access Femtocells
Shrestha Ghosh, R. Vanlin Sathya, Arun Ramamurthy, B. Akilesh, Tamma Bheemarjuna Reddy
Comput. Commun.1
2015 Achieving Data Survivability and Confidentiality in Unattended Wireless Sensor Networks
abstract
In Unattended Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSNs) the nodes are subjected to hostile environment for sensing critical data. Due to the unattended nature of the network the sink is not always present. Hence, the nodes in the network are required to function in a distributed way in order to ensure Data Survivability and Data Confidentiality. In this work we address these two issues. We have proposed algorithm (s) to ensure Data Survivability by encryption and data replication. We propose a simple scheme for key management which ensures confidentiality by sharing the key among various nodes in the network so that the adversary cannot read the data by compromising a node in the network. We have compared our scheme with the existing ones, both mathematically and by simulations. Analysis shows that our scheme performs better in terms of overheads and efficiency.
Arpan Sen, Shrestha Ghosh, Arinjoy Basak, Harsh Parsuram Puria, Sushmita Ruj
AINA2