Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Huiqing Guo

dblp:162/2690 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-0832-8046ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Face, body and person analysis · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Digital forensics and information hiding
deepfake detection
1.012026
Component-Specific Prompt Tuning for Deepfake Detection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026
Digital forensics and information hiding › deepfake detection
multimodal deepfake detection
1.012026
Component-Specific Prompt Tuning for Deepfake Detection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face analysis
facial component analysis
0.312026
Component-Specific Prompt Tuning for Deepfake Detection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

visual question answering · 2.0q-former · 2.0prompt tuning · 2.0visual language models · 1.0visual language model · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 DeepFidelity: Perceptual Forgery Fidelity Assessment for Deepfake Detection
abstract
Deepfake detection refers to detecting artificially generated or edited faces in images or videos, which plays an essential role in visual information security. Despite promising progress in recent years, Deepfake detection remains a challenging problem due to the complexity and variability of face forgery techniques. Existing Deepfake detection methods are often devoted to extracting features by designing sophisticated networks but ignore the influence of perceptual quality of faces. Considering the complexity of the quality distribution of real and fake faces, we propose a deepfake detection framework called DeepFidelity, which mines the perceptual forgery fidelity of face images and introduces a quality-aware scoring mechanism to distinguish real and fake faces of different image qualities. Specifically, we improve the model’s ability to identify complex samples by mapping real and fake face data of different qualities to different scores to distinguish them in a more detailed way. In addition, we propose a network structure called Symmetric Spatial Attention Augmentation based vision Transformer (SSAAFormer), which uses the symmetry of face images to promote the network to model the geographic long-distance relationship at the shallow level and augment local features. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method over state-of-the-art methods. The code is available athttps://github.com/shimmer-ghq/DeepFidelity.
Chunlei Peng, Huiqing Guo, Decheng Liu, Nannan Wang 0001, Ruimin Hu, Xinbo Gao 0001
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol.2
2026 Component-Specific Prompt Tuning for Deepfake Detection
abstract
With the development of deep learning technology, the facial images generated by deepfake technology have reached a level of authenticity that is difficult to distinguish, posing a serious threat to personal privacy and data security. Therefore, it is of great significance to develop efficient and reliable deepfake detection technology. In recent years, Visual Language Models (VLM) have been applied to deepfake detection tasks due to their powerful multimodal understanding capabilities. However, the existing VLM have not been specifically optimized for deepfake detection tasks. When directly applied to this task, there are problems such as insufficient model accuracy and insufficient feature extraction, especially when dealing with complex forgery scenes. In response to these challenges, this paper proposes an innovative deepfake face detection method based on VLM and component-specific prompt tuning. We transform the deepfake detection task into a Visual Question Answering (VQA) task, making full use of the multimodal understanding capabilities of VLM and the flexibility of prompt tuning technology. This method uses a local prompt strategy to customize specific prompt questions for key facial components such as eyes, nose, and mouth, guiding the model to focus on the local features of these areas, thereby accurately capturing forgery traces. In addition, we introduced a feature extraction module Q-Former based on instructions, which can flexibly adjust the focus area of visual features according to prompts, significantly improving the model’s perception of locally forged features. By fusing these local features extracted by Q-Former and combining them with the language model to judge the authenticity of the overall face image, we can finally generate accurate prediction results. A large number of experimental results show that our method is significantly better than existing technologies in terms of detection accuracy and robustness.
Yinyin Chen, Huiqing Guo, Chunlei Peng, Nannan Wang 0001, Xinbo Gao 0001
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.2
2025 Revisiting face forgery detection towards generalization
Chunlei Peng, Decheng Liu, Huiqing Guo, Nannan Wang 0001, Xinbo Gao 0001
Neural Networks4