Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matt Skach

dblp:163/0039 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-7198-7215ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
5 papers
Energy-efficient computing · 58% Cloud and datacenter computing · 33% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 6%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Autonomous driving · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Energy-efficient computing
thermal management
0.932019
Understanding the Impact of Socket Density in Density Optimized Servers · HPCA 2019
Virtual Melting Temperature: Managing Server Load to Minimize Cooling Overhead with Phase Change Materials · ISCA 2018
Thermal time shifting: leveraging phase change materials to reduce cooling costs in warehouse-scale computers · ISCA 2015
Energy-efficient computing › power management
dynamic voltage and frequency scaling
0.812024
Expanding Datacenter Capacity with DVFS Boosting: A safe and scalable deployment experience · ASPLOS (1) 2024
Energy-efficient computing
power management
0.812024
Expanding Datacenter Capacity with DVFS Boosting: A safe and scalable deployment experience · ASPLOS (1) 2024
Energy-efficient computing › thermal management
datacenter cooling
0.522018
Virtual Melting Temperature: Managing Server Load to Minimize Cooling Overhead with Phase Change Materials · ISCA 2018
Thermal time shifting: leveraging phase change materials to reduce cooling costs in warehouse-scale computers · ISCA 2015
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter architecture
datacenter server architecture
0.412019
Understanding the Impact of Socket Density in Density Optimized Servers · HPCA 2019
Energy-efficient computing › thermal management
thermal-aware scheduling
0.412019
Understanding the Impact of Socket Density in Density Optimized Servers · HPCA 2019
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster resource management and scheduling
cluster resource management
0.312018
Virtual Melting Temperature: Managing Server Load to Minimize Cooling Overhead with Phase Change Materials · ISCA 2018
Cloud and datacenter computing
datacenter operations
0.212024
Expanding Datacenter Capacity with DVFS Boosting: A safe and scalable deployment experience · ASPLOS (1) 2024
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter architecture
warehouse-scale computer
0.212015
Thermal time shifting: leveraging phase change materials to reduce cooling costs in warehouse-scale computers · ISCA 2015
Parallel and multicore computing
task scheduling
0.112019
Understanding the Impact of Socket Density in Density Optimized Servers · HPCA 2019
Embedded and real-time systems
timing constraints
0.112018
The Architectural Implications of Autonomous Driving: Constraints and Acceleration · ASPLOS 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deployment experience · 0.8simulation · 0.7GPU acceleration · 0.7FPGA acceleration · 0.7ASIC acceleration · 0.7phase change materials · 0.5analytical modeling · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Expanding Datacenter Capacity with DVFS Boosting: A safe and scalable deployment experience
abstract
COVID-19 pandemic created unexpected demand for our physical infrastructure. We increased our computing supply by growing our infrastructure footprint as well as expanded existing capacity by using various techniques among those DVFS boosting. This paper describes our experience in deploying DVFS boosting to expand capacity.
Leonardo Piga, Iyswarya Narayanan, Aditya Sundarrajan, Matt Skach, Qingyuan Deng, Biswadip Maity, Manoj Chakkaravarthy, Alison Huang, Abhishek Dhanotia, Parth Malani
ASPLOS (1)4
2019 Understanding the Impact of Socket Density in Density Optimized Servers
abstract
The increasing demand for computational power has led to the creation and deployment of large-scale data centers. During the last few years, data centers have seen improvements aimed at increasing computational density - the amount of throughput that can be achieved within the allocated physical footprint. This need to pack more compute in the same physical space has led to density optimized server designs. Density optimized servers push compute density significantly beyond what can be achieved by blade servers by using innovative modular chassis based designs. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the impact of socket density on intra-server thermals and demonstrates that increased socket density inside the server leads to large temperature variations among sockets due to inter-socket thermal coupling. The paper shows that traditional chip-level and data center-level temperature-aware scheduling techniques do not work well for thermally-coupled sockets. The paper proposes new scheduling techniques that account for the thermals of the socket a task is scheduled on, as well as thermally coupled nearby sockets. The proposed mechanisms provide 2.5% to 6.5% performance improvements across various workloads and as much as 17% over traditional temperature-aware schedulers for computation-heavy workloads.
Manish Arora, Matt Skach, Wei Huang 0004, Xudong An, Jason Mars, Lingjia Tang, Dean M. Tullsen
HPCA2
2018 The Architectural Implications of Autonomous Driving: Constraints and Acceleration
abstract
Autonomous driving systems have attracted a significant amount of interest recently, and many industry leaders, such as Google, Uber, Tesla, and Mobileye, have invested a large amount of capital and engineering power on developing such systems. Building autonomous driving systems is particularly challenging due to stringent performance requirements in terms of both making the safe operational decisions and finishing processing at real-time. Despite the recent advancements in technology, such systems are still largely under experimentation and architecting end-to-end autonomous driving systems remains an open research question. To investigate this question, we first present and formalize the design constraints for building an autonomous driving system in terms of performance, predictability, storage, thermal and power. We then build an end-to-end autonomous driving system using state-of-the-art award-winning algorithms to understand the design trade-offs for building such systems. In our real-system characterization, we identify three computational bottlenecks, which conventional multicore CPUs are incapable of processing under the identified design constraints. To meet these constraints, we accelerate these algorithms using three accelerator platforms including GPUs, FPGAs, and ASICs, which can reduce the tail latency of the system by 169x, 10x, and 93x respectively. With accelerator-based designs, we are able to build an end-to-end autonomous driving system that meets all the design constraints, and explore the trade-offs among performance, power and the higher accuracy enabled by higher resolution cameras.
Shih-Chieh Lin, Chang-Hong Hsu, Matt Skach, Md. Enamul Haque, Lingjia Tang, Jason Mars
ASPLOS4
2018 Virtual Melting Temperature: Managing Server Load to Minimize Cooling Overhead with Phase Change Materials
abstract
As the power density and power consumption of large scale datacenters continue to grow, the challenges of removing heat from these datacenters and keeping them cool is an increasingly urgent and costly. With the largest datacenters now exceeding over 200 MW of power, the cooling systems that prevent overheating cost on the order of tens of millions of dollars. Prior work proposed to deploy phase change materials (PCM) and use Thermal Time Shifting (TTS) to reshape the thermal load of a datacenter by storing heat during peak hours of high utilization and releasing it during off hours when utilization is low, enabling a smaller cooling system to handle the same peak load. The peak cooling load reduction enabled by TTS is greatly beneficial, however TTS is a passive system that cannot handle many workload mixtures or adapt to changing load or environmental characteristics. In this work we propose VMT, a thermal aware job placement technique that adds an active, tunable component to enable greater control over datacenter thermal output. We propose two different job placement algorithms for VMT and perform a scale out study of VMT in a simulated server cluster. We provide analysis of the use cases and trade-offs of each algorithm, and show that VMT reduces peak cooling load by up to 12.8% to provide over two million dollars in cost savings when a smaller cooling system is installed, or allows for over 7,000 additional servers to be added in scenarios where TTS is ineffective.
Matt Skach, Manish Arora, Dean M. Tullsen, Lingjia Tang, Jason Mars
ISCA1
2015 Thermal time shifting: leveraging phase change materials to reduce cooling costs in warehouse-scale computers
abstract
Datacenters, or warehouse scale computers, are rapidly increasing in size and power consumption. However, this growth comes at the cost of an increasing thermal load that must be removed to prevent overheating and server failure. In this paper, we propose to use phase changing materials (PCM) to shape the thermal load of a datacenter, absorbing and releasing heat when it is advantageous to do so. We present and validate a methodology to study the impact of PCM on a datacenter, and evaluate two important opportunities for cost savings. We find that in a datacenter with full cooling system subscription, PCM can reduce the necessary cooling system size by up to 12% without impacting peak throughput, or increase the number of servers by up to 14.6% without increasing the cooling load. In a thermally constrained setting, PCM can increase peak throughput up to 69% while delaying the onset of thermal limits by over 3 hours.
Matt Skach, Manish Arora, Chang-Hong Hsu, Dean M. Tullsen, Lingjia Tang, Jason Mars
ISCA1