Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Darius Suciu

dblp:163/2618 · also Darius Andrei Suciu · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-5227-1254ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 7 · 5 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
4 papers
Systems and software security · 24% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 23% Privacy and data protection · 23%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
communication privacy
0.712023
Wink: Deniable Secure Messaging · USENIX Security Symposium 2023
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure messaging
0.712023
Wink: Deniable Secure Messaging · USENIX Security Symposium 2023
Systems and software security › operating system security
privilege escalation
0.412020
Horizontal Privilege Escalation in Trusted Applications · USENIX Security Symposium 2020
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments
0.422020
POSTER: DroidShield: Protecting User Applications from Normal World Access · CCS 2016
Horizontal Privilege Escalation in Trusted Applications · USENIX Security Symposium 2020
Malware analysis › rootkit detection
kernel rootkit detection
0.212016
POSTER: KXRay: Introspecting the Kernel for Rootkit Timing Footprints · CCS 2016
Systems and software security › operating system security
mobile OS security
0.212016
POSTER: DroidShield: Protecting User Applications from Normal World Access · CCS 2016
Network security
anonymity networks
0.212023
Wink: Deniable Secure Messaging · USENIX Security Symposium 2023
Operating systems › mobile systems
mobile operating systems
0.112016
POSTER: DroidShield: Protecting User Applications from Normal World Access · CCS 2016
Cloud and datacenter computing › virtualization
virtual machine introspection
0.112016
POSTER: KXRay: Introspecting the Kernel for Rootkit Timing Footprints · CCS 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

virtual machine introspection · 0.5trustzone world separation · 0.5data structure signature matching · 0.5TZ-RKP kernel protection · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Overseer: Enforcing fine-grained memory access control across execution environments
Darius Suciu, Sandeep Kiran Pinjala, Radu Sion
AsiaCCS1
2026 Helltrap: Transforming physical machines into UEFI rootkit traps
Darius Suciu, Jake Christensen, Radu Sion
EuroS&P1
2023 Wink: Deniable Secure Messaging
Anrin Chakraborti, Darius Suciu, Radu Sion
USENIX Security Symposium2
2022 AppBastion: Protection from Untrusted Apps and OSes on ARM
Darius Suciu, Radu Sion, Michael Ferdman
ESORICS (2)1
2020 Horizontal Privilege Escalation in Trusted Applications
Darius Suciu, Stephen E. McLaughlin, Radu Sion
USENIX Security Symposium1
2016 POSTER: KXRay: Introspecting the Kernel for Rootkit Timing Footprints
abstract
Kernel rootkits often hide associated malicious processes by altering reported task struct information to upper layers and applications such as ps and top. Virtualized settings offer a unique opportunity to mitigate this behavior using dynamic virtual machine introspection (VMI). For known kernels, VMI can be deployed to search for kernel objects and identify them by using unique data structure "signatures".
Chen Chen 0057, Darius Suciu, Radu Sion
CCS2
2016 POSTER: DroidShield: Protecting User Applications from Normal World Access
abstract
Smartphones are becoming the main data sharing and storage devices in both our personal and professional lives, as companies now allow employees to share the same device for both purposes, provided the company's confidential information can be protected. However, as history has shown, systems relying on security policies or rules to protect user data are not airtight. Any flaw in the constructed rules or in the code of privileged applications can lead to complete compromise. In addition, we can not rely only on TrustZone[6] world separation to isolate confidential data from unauthorized access, because in addition to severe limitations in terms of both communication and memory space, there is a very low limit on the number of applications that can be installed in the secure world before we can start questioning its security, especially when considering code originating from multiple sources. Thus, the solutions currently available for TrustZone devices are not perfect and the data confidentiality can not be guaranteed. We propose an alternative approach, which involves providing the majority of secure world application advantages to a set of normal world applications, with almost none of the drawbacks by relying only on the TrustZone world separation and the TZ-RKP[2] kernel protection scheme.
Darius Suciu, Radu Sion
CCS1