Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Verneri Anttila
dblp:164/0823
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0002-0073-4675ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 95% Medical and health informatics · 5% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
genetic association study |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | LD Hub: a centralized database and web interface to perform LD score regression that maximizes the potential of summary level GWAS data for SNP heritability and genetic correlation analysis · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › post-GWAS analysis
genetic correlation analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | LD Hub: a centralized database and web interface to perform LD score regression that maximizes the potential of summary level GWAS data for SNP heritability and genetic correlation analysis · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › heritability estimation
SNP heritability |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | LD Hub: a centralized database and web interface to perform LD score regression that maximizes the potential of summary level GWAS data for SNP heritability and genetic correlation analysis · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
phenotype prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | In silico phenotyping via co-training for improved phenotype prediction from genotype · Bioinform. 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
LD score regression · 0.3semi-supervised learning · 0.2co-training · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | LD Hub: a centralized database and web interface to perform LD score regression that maximizes the potential of summary level GWAS data for SNP heritability and genetic correlation analysisabstractMOTIVATION: LD score regression is a reliable and efficient method of using genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary-level results data to estimate the SNP heritability of complex traits and diseases, partition this heritability into functional categories, and estimate the genetic correlation between different phenotypes. Because the method relies on summary level results data, LD score regression is computationally tractable even for very large sample sizes. However, publicly available GWAS summary-level data are typically stored in different databases and have different formats, making it difficult to apply LD score regression to estimate genetic correlations across many different traits simultaneously. RESULTS: In this manuscript, we describe LD Hub - a centralized database of summary-level GWAS results for 173 diseases/traits from different publicly available resources/consortia and a web interface that automates the LD score regression analysis pipeline. To demonstrate functionality and validate our software, we replicated previously reported LD score regression analyses of 49 traits/diseases using LD Hub; and estimated SNP heritability and the genetic correlation across the different phenotypes. We also present new results obtained by uploading a recent atopic dermatitis GWAS meta-analysis to examine the genetic correlation between the condition and other potentially related traits. In response to the growing availability of publicly accessible GWAS summary-level results data, our database and the accompanying web interface will ensure maximal uptake of the LD score regression methodology, provide a useful database for the public dissemination of GWAS results, and provide a method for easily screening hundreds of traits for overlapping genetic aetiologies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The web interface and instructions for using LD Hub are available at http://ldsc.broadinstitute.org/ CONTACT: [email protected] information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Jie Zheng 0006, Mesut A. Erzurumluoglu, Benjamin L. Elsworth, John P. Kemp, Laurence J. Howe, Philip C. Haycock, Gibran Hemani, Katherine Tansey, Charles Laurin, Early Genetics, Beate St. Pourcain, Nicole M. Warrington, Hilary K. Finucane, Alkes L. Price, Brendan K. Bulik-Sullivan, Verneri Anttila, Lavinia Paternoster, Tom R. Gaunt, David M. Evans 0002, Benjamin M. Neale |
Bioinform. | 17 |
| 2015 | In silico phenotyping via co-training for improved phenotype prediction from genotypeabstractMOTIVATION: Predicting disease phenotypes from genotypes is a key challenge in medical applications in the postgenomic era. Large training datasets of patients that have been both genotyped and phenotyped are the key requisite when aiming for high prediction accuracy. With current genotyping projects producing genetic data for hundreds of thousands of patients, large-scale phenotyping has become the bottleneck in disease phenotype prediction. RESULTS: Here we present an approach for imputing missing disease phenotypes given the genotype of a patient. Our approach is based on co-training, which predicts the phenotype of unlabeled patients based on a second class of information, e.g. clinical health record information. Augmenting training datasets by this type of in silico phenotyping can lead to significant improvements in prediction accuracy. We demonstrate this on a dataset of patients with two diagnostic types of migraine, termed migraine with aura and migraine without aura, from the International Headache Genetics Consortium. CONCLUSIONS: Imputing missing disease phenotypes for patients via co-training leads to larger training datasets and improved prediction accuracy in phenotype prediction. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code can be obtained at: http://www.bsse.ethz.ch/mlcb/research/bioinformatics-and-computational-biology/co-training.html Damian Roqueiro, Menno J. Witteveen, Verneri Anttila, Gisela M. Terwindt, Arn M. J. M. van den Maagdenberg, Karsten M. Borgwardt |
Bioinform. | 3 |