Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Janis Lena Meissner
dblp:164/2589
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2014-6085ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 7 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
4 papers |
Collaborative and social computing · 32% Design research and methods · 28% Accessibility and assistive technology · 18% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative and social computing
community-based research |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Configuring Participatory Research as Give and Take Relationships: Methodological Reflections on Co-Designing Booklets with a Men Shed · CHI 2025 |
Design research and methods
participatory design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Configuring Participatory Research as Give and Take Relationships: Methodological Reflections on Co-Designing Booklets with a Men Shed · CHI 2025 |
Collaborative and social computing › online communities
maker communities |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | More than the Sum of Makers: The Complex Dynamics of Diverse Practices at Maker Faire · CHI 2019 |
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces › maker culture
maker movement |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | More than the Sum of Makers: The Complex Dynamics of Diverse Practices at Maker Faire · CHI 2019 |
Interaction techniques and input › input sensing › touch sensing
capacitive touch sensing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Schnittmuster for Crafting Context-Sensitive Toolkits · CHI 2018 |
Design research and methods › design practice
DIY practice |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | More than the Sum of Makers: The Complex Dynamics of Diverse Practices at Maker Faire · CHI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
participatory research · 0.9co-design · 0.9case study · 0.9stakeholder analysis · 0.4qualitative study · 0.4toolkit instantiation · 0.3prototyping · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Configuring Participatory Research as Give and Take Relationships: Methodological Reflections on Co-Designing Booklets with a Men Shed
Janis Lena Meissner |
CHI | 1 |
| 2025 | From Participation to Solidarity: A Case Study on Access of Maker Spaces from Deaf and Hearing Perspectives
Oliver Suchanek, Janis Lena Meissner, Robin Angelini, Katta Spiel |
CHI | 2 |
| 2020 | "We come together as one...and hope for solidarity to live on": On Designing Technologies for Activism and the Commemoration of Lost LivesabstractOn the International Day to End Violence Against Sex Workers (IDEVASW), sex worker rights advocates and support services commemorate lives lost due to violence. In this paper we describe and reflect on a Feminist Participatory Action Research project that supported the activities of IDEVASW over two years in North East England. Working alongside a charity that provides services to women who are sex workers or have experienced sexual exploitation, we co-organised the first activist march on the day. As researchers and service providers, we present detailed reflections on the use of digital technologies during the public activist march, a private service for commemoration, and the development of a semi-public archive to collect experiences of the day. We develop three implications for the design of digital technologies for activism and the commemoration of lost lives: as catalysts for reflection and opportunities to layer experience. Angelika Strohmayer, Janis Lena Meissner, Alexander Wilson, Sarah Charlton, Laura McIntyre |
Conference on Designing Interactive Systems | 2 |
| 2019 | More than the Sum of Makers: The Complex Dynamics of Diverse Practices at Maker FaireabstractHuman Computer Interaction has developed great interest in the Maker Movement. Previous work has explored it from various perspectives, focusing either on its potentials or issues. As these are however only fragmented portrayals, this paper aims to take a broader perspective and interconnect some of the fragments. We conducted a qualitative study in the context of two Maker Faires to gain a better understanding of the complex dynamics that makers operate in. We captured the voices of different stakeholders and explored how their respective agendas relate to each other. The findings illustrate how the event is co-created at the nexus of different technological, social and economic interests while leaving space for diverse practices. The paper contributes a first focused analysis of Maker Faire, probes it as a site for research and discusses how holistic perspectives on the Maker Movement could create new research opportunities. Janis Lena Meissner, Pradthana Jarusriboonchai, Janice McLaughlin, Peter C. Wright |
CHI | 1 |
| 2018 | A Schnittmuster for Crafting Context-Sensitive ToolkitsabstractDIY-making can be an expensive pastime if makers are relying on ready-made toolkits, specialised materials and off-shelf components. Many prefabricated commercial kits seek to lower the learning barrier of making and to help beginners to successfully take their first steps in engineering. However, as soon as the novices become a little more advanced, these toolkits often do not fit the specific requirements of personal maker projects anymore. We introduce the idea of a Schnittmuster (or a meta-toolkit) as a novel approach to toolkit design that seeks to address these creativity-limiting factors as well as practical entrance hurdles. To demonstrate the adaptive power of the Schnittmuster concept, we discuss an exemplar in the context of capacitive touch sensing (FlexE-Touch). Implemented under the constraints of materials, user skill sets and making environments, we illustrate how the Schnittmuster facilitated four cheap and flexible toolkit instantiations for crafting custom touch sensor electrodes. Janis Lena Meissner, Angelika Strohmayer, Peter C. Wright, Geraldine Fitzpatrick |
CHI | 1 |
| 2017 | Do-It-Yourself Empowerment as Experienced by Novice Makers with DisabilitiesabstractRecent HCI research has highlighted the potential afforded by maker technologies for supporting new forms of DIY Assistive Technology (DIY-AT) for people with disabilities. Furthermore, the popular discourse surrounding both the maker movement and disability is one of democratisation and empowerment. Despite this, critics argue that maker movement membership lacks diversity and that within DIY-AT, it is seldom the people with disabilities who are creating such designs. We conducted a qualitative study that explored how people with disabilities experience the empowering potential of making. We analysed online videos by makers with disabilities and conducted fieldwork at two makerspaces. These informed the design of DIY-Abilities, a series of workshops for people with disabilities in which participants could learn different maker technologies and complete their own maker project. Through analysis of participants' narratives we contribute a new perspective on the specific social and material capacities of accessible maker initiatives. Janis Lena Meissner, John Vines, Janice McLaughlin, Thomas Nappey, Jekaterina Maksimova, Peter C. Wright |
Conference on Designing Interactive Systems | 1 |
| 2015 | Tools for Wools: An Interactive Urban Knitting Installation and Creative Research MethodabstractUrban knitting (also known as yarn bombing, knitted graffiti and guerilla knitting) is a globally occurring street art trend which uses traditional craft techniques to modify objects in urban space. It is the chosen tool of present-day craftspeople for creative expression in public. However, the personal narratives woven into the installations usually remain inaccessible for the broad audience. This paper presents my Master's thesis work on "Tools for Wools", an interactive prototype which integrates physical wool panels, touch sensors and an information device with intent to fill the identified information gap. The subsequent evaluation allowed insights on the manifold reasons for urban knitters to engage in this particular form of everyday creativity. I therefore suggest that such prototype projects can also serve as a qualitative research tool to reveal motivations underlying creative craft practices. Janis Lena Meissner |
Creativity & Cognition | 1 |