Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Samira Shabanian
dblp:164/6174
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 43% Language models and text generation · 20% Efficient and distributed learning · 19% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Fairness-Aware Structured Pruning in Transformers · AAAI 2024 Deep Learning on a Healthy Data Diet: Finding Important Examples for Fairness · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias mitigation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Fairness-Aware Structured Pruning in Transformers · AAAI 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
controllable text generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Successor Features for Efficient Multi-Subject Controlled Text Generation · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Fairness-Aware Structured Pruning in Transformers · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
structured pruning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Fairness-Aware Structured Pruning in Transformers · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
successor features |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Successor Features for Efficient Multi-Subject Controlled Text Generation · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fair data pre-processing
data augmentation for fairness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Learning on a Healthy Data Diet: Finding Important Examples for Fairness · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › bias mitigation
gender bias mitigation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Learning on a Healthy Data Diet: Finding Important Examples for Fairness · AAAI 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
language model rectification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Systematic Rectification of Language Models via Dead-end Analysis · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Bidirectional Helmholtz Machines · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › deep latent variable model
helmholtz machine |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Bidirectional Helmholtz Machines · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Bidirectional Helmholtz Machines · ICML 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › language model architecture
transformer language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Fairness-Aware Structured Pruning in Transformers · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
successor features · 0.8reinforcement learning · 0.8attention head pruning · 0.8dead-end analysis · 0.7data pruning · 0.7counterfactual data augmentation · 0.7variational lower bound · 0.2bhattacharyya distance · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Fairness-Aware Structured Pruning in TransformersabstractThe increasing size of large language models (LLMs) has introduced challenges in their training and inference. Removing model components is perceived as a solution to tackle the large model sizes, however, existing pruning methods solely focus on performance, without considering an essential aspect for the responsible use of LLMs: model fairness. It is crucial to address the fairness of LLMs towards diverse groups, such as women, Black people, LGBTQ+, Jewish communities, among others, as they are being deployed and available to a wide audience. In this work, first, we investigate how attention heads impact fairness and performance in pre-trained transformer-based language models. We then propose a novel method to prune the attention heads that negatively impact fairness while retaining the heads critical for performance, i.e. language modeling capabilities. Our approach is practical in terms of time and resources, as it does not require fine-tuning the final pruned, and fairer, model. Our findings demonstrate a reduction in gender bias by 19%, 19.5%, 39.5%, 34.7%, 23%, and 8% for DistilGPT-2, GPT-2, GPT-Neo of two different sizes, GPT-J, and Llama 2 models, respectively, in comparison to the biased model, with only a slight decrease in performance. WARNING: This work uses language that is offensive in nature. Abdelrahman Zayed, Gonçalo Mordido, Samira Shabanian, Ioana Baldini, Sarath Chandar |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2024 | Successor Features for Efficient Multi-Subject Controlled Text GenerationabstractWhile large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance in generating fluent and realistic text, controlling the generated text so that it exhibits properties such as safety, factuality, and non-toxicity remains challenging. Existing decoding-based controllable text generation methods are static in terms of the dimension of control; if the target subject is changed, they require new training. Moreover, it can quickly become prohibitive to concurrently control multiple subjects. To address these challenges, we first show that existing methods can be framed as a reinforcement learning problem, where an action-value function estimates the likelihood of a desired attribute appearing in the generated text. Then, we introduce a novel approach named SF-Gen, which leverages the concept of successor features to decouple the dynamics of LLMs from task-specific rewards. By employing successor features, our method proves to be memory-efficient and computationally efficient for both training and decoding, especially when dealing with multiple target subjects. To the best of our knowledge, our research represents the first application of successor features in text generation. In addition to its computational efficiency, the resultant language produced by our method is comparable to the SOTA (and outperforms baselines) in both control measures as well as language quality, which we demonstrate through a series of experiments in various controllable text generation tasks. Meng Cao 0003, Mehdi Fatemi, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung, Samira Shabanian |
ICML | 4 |
| 2023 | Deep Learning on a Healthy Data Diet: Finding Important Examples for FairnessabstractData-driven predictive solutions predominant in commercial applications tend to suffer from biases and stereotypes, which raises equity concerns. Prediction models may discover, use, or amplify spurious correlations based on gender or other protected personal characteristics, thus discriminating against marginalized groups. Mitigating gender bias has become an important research focus in natural language processing (NLP) and is an area where annotated corpora are available. Data augmentation reduces gender bias by adding counterfactual examples to the training dataset. In this work, we show that some of the examples in the augmented dataset can be not important or even harmful to fairness. We hence propose a general method for pruning both the factual and counterfactual examples to maximize the model’s fairness as measured by the demographic parity, equality of opportunity, and equality of odds. The fairness achieved by our method surpasses that of data augmentation on three text classification datasets, using no more than half of the examples in the augmented dataset. Our experiments are conducted using models of varying sizes and pre-training settings. WARNING: This work uses language that is offensive in nature. Abdelrahman Zayed, Prasanna Parthasarathi, Gonçalo Mordido, Hamid Palangi, Samira Shabanian, Sarath Chandar |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2023 | Systematic Rectification of Language Models via Dead-end Analysis
Meng Cao 0003, Mehdi Fatemi, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung, Samira Shabanian |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2016 | Bidirectional Helmholtz MachinesabstractEfficient unsupervised training and inference in deep generative models remains a challenging problem. One basic approach, called Helmholtz machine or Variational Autoencoder, involves training a top-down directed generative model together with a bottom-up auxiliary model used for approximate inference. Recent results indicate that better generative models can be obtained with better approximate inference procedures. Instead of improving the inference procedure, we here propose a new model, the bidirectional Helmholtz machine, which guarantees that the top-down and bottom-up distributions can efficiently invert each other. We achieve this by interpreting both the top-down and the bottom-up directed models as approximate inference distributions and by defining the model distribution to be the geometric mean of these two. We present a lower-bound for the likelihood of this model and we show that optimizing this bound regularizes the model so that the Bhattacharyya distance between the bottom-up and top-down approximate distributions is minimized. This approach results in state of the art generative models which prefer significantly deeper architectures while it allows for orders of magnitude more efficient likelihood estimation. Jörg Bornschein, Samira Shabanian, Asja Fischer, Yoshua Bengio |
ICML | 2 |