Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kevin A. Lai

dblp:164/6231 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-3128-8142ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
5 papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 51% Mathematical optimization · 32% Approximation and online algorithms · 6%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning theory · 50% Optimization for machine learning · 36% 3D vision · 14%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 22 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › learning in games
fictitious play
0.512021
Fast Convergence of Fictitious Play for Diagonal Payoff Matrices · SODA 2021
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
game dynamics
0.512021
Fast Convergence of Fictitious Play for Diagonal Payoff Matrices · SODA 2021
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › solution concepts in games › equilibrium concepts
nash equilibrium
0.512021
Fast Convergence of Fictitious Play for Diagonal Payoff Matrices · SODA 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
no-regret algorithms
0.312018
Faster Rates for Convex-Concave Games · COLT 2018
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.312018
Faster Rates for Convex-Concave Games · COLT 2018
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic gradient descent
preconditioned SGD
0.312018
$\ell_1$ Regression using Lewis Weights Preconditioning and Stochastic Gradient Descent · COLT 2018
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.312018
$\ell_1$ Regression using Lewis Weights Preconditioning and Stochastic Gradient Descent · COLT 2018
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving query processing
adaptive query answering
0.312018
Differential Privacy for Growing Databases · NeurIPS 2018
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.312018
Differential Privacy for Growing Databases · NeurIPS 2018
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis
0.312018
Differential Privacy for Growing Databases · NeurIPS 2018
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
equilibrium computation
0.312018
Faster Rates for Convex-Concave Games · COLT 2018
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › regression › regularized regression
l1 regression
0.312018
$\ell_1$ Regression using Lewis Weights Preconditioning and Stochastic Gradient Descent · COLT 2018
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › regression › robust regression
least absolute deviations
0.312018
$\ell_1$ Regression using Lewis Weights Preconditioning and Stochastic Gradient Descent · COLT 2018
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
regression
0.312018
$\ell_1$ Regression using Lewis Weights Preconditioning and Stochastic Gradient Descent · COLT 2018
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory › robust learnability
learning with malicious noise
0.212016
Agnostic Estimation of Mean and Covariance · FOCS 2016
Computer vision › 3D vision
robust estimation
0.212016
Agnostic Estimation of Mean and Covariance · FOCS 2016
Computational complexity
lower bounds
0.212015
Label optimal regret bounds for online local learning · COLT 2015
Approximation and online algorithms
online learning
0.212015
Label optimal regret bounds for online local learning · COLT 2015
Algorithms and data structures
linear algebra
0.112018
$\ell_1$ Regression using Lewis Weights Preconditioning and Stochastic Gradient Descent · COLT 2018
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization › preconditioning
matrix preconditioning
0.112018
$\ell_1$ Regression using Lewis Weights Preconditioning and Stochastic Gradient Descent · COLT 2018
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › matrix factorization
singular value decomposition
0.112016
Agnostic Estimation of Mean and Covariance · FOCS 2016
Mathematical optimization
semidefinite programming
0.112015
Label optimal regret bounds for online local learning · COLT 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic gradient descent · 0.7smoothing reduction · 0.7private multiplicative weights · 0.7preconditioning · 0.7no-regret algorithms · 0.7lewis weights · 0.7frank-wolfe method · 0.7polynomial-time estimation · 0.5lexicographic tie-breaking · 0.5information-theoretic lower bounds · 0.2information-theoretic lower bound · 0.2regret analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Last-Iterate Convergence Rates for Min-Max Optimization: Convergence of Hamiltonian Gradient Descent and Consensus Optimization
abstract
While classic work in convex-concave min-max optimization relies on average-iterate convergence results, the emergence of nonconvex applications such as training Generative Adversarial Networks has led to renewed interest in last-iterate convergence guarantees. Proving last-iterate convergence is challenging because many natural algorithms, such as Simultaneous Gradient Descent/Ascent, provably diverge or cycle even in simple convex-concave min-max settings, and there are relatively few papers that prove global last-iterate convergence rates beyond the bilinear and convex-strongly concave settings. In this work, we show that the Hamiltonian Gradient Descent (HGD) algorithm achieves linear convergence in a variety of more general settings, including convex-concave problems that satisfy a "sufficiently bilinear" condition. We also prove convergence rates for stochastic HGD and for some parameter settings of the Consensus Optimization algorithm of Mescheder et al. (2017).
Jacob D. Abernethy, Kevin A. Lai, Andre Wibisono
ALT2
2021 Fast Convergence of Fictitious Play for Diagonal Payoff Matrices
abstract
Fictitious Play (FP) is a simple and natural dynamic for repeated play in zero-sum games. Proposed by Brown in 1949, FP was shown to converge to a Nash Equilibrium by Robinson in 1951, albeit at a slow rate that may depend on the dimension of the problem. In 1959, Karlin conjectured that FP converges at the more natural rate of . However, Daskalakis and Pan disproved a version of this conjecture in 2014, showing that a slow rate can occur, although their result relies on adversarial tie-breaking. In this paper, we show that Karlin's conjecture is indeed correct for the class of diagonal payoff matrices, as long as ties are broken lexicographically. Specifically, we show that FP converges at a rate in the case when the payoff matrix is diagonal. We also prove this bound is tight by showing a matching lower bound in the identity payoff case under the lexicographic tie-breaking assumption.
Jacob D. Abernethy, Kevin A. Lai, Andre Wibisono
SODA2
2018 Faster Rates for Convex-Concave Games
abstract
We consider the use of no-regret algorithms to compute equilibria for particular classes of convex-concave games. While standard regret bounds would lead to convergence rates on the order of $O(T^{-1/2})$, recent work \citep{RS13,SALS15} has established $O(1/T)$ rates by taking advantage of a particular class of optimistic prediction algorithms. In this work we go further, showing that for a particular class of games one achieves a $O(1/T^2)$ rate, and we show how this applies to the Frank-Wolfe method and recovers a similar bound \citep{D15}. We also show that such no-regret techniques can even achieve a linear rate, $O(\exp(-T))$, for equilibrium computation under additional curvature assumptions.
Jacob D. Abernethy, Kevin A. Lai, Kfir Y. Levy, Jun-Kun Wang
COLT2
2018 $\ell_1$ Regression using Lewis Weights Preconditioning and Stochastic Gradient Descent
abstract
We present preconditioned stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms for the $\ell_1$ minimization problem $\min_{\boldsymbol{\mathit{x}}}\|\boldsymbol{\mathit{A}} \boldsymbol{\mathit{x}} - \boldsymbol{\mathit{b}}\|_1$ in the overdetermined case, where there are far more constraints than variables. Specifically, we have $\boldsymbol{\mathit{A}} \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$ for $n \gg d$. Commonly known as the Least Absolute Deviations problem, $\ell_1$ regression can be used to solve many important combinatorial problems, such as minimum cut and shortest path. SGD-based algorithms are appealing for their simplicity and practical efficiency. Our primary insight is that careful preprocessing can yield preconditioned matrices $\tilde{\boldsymbol{\mathit{A}}}$ with strong properties (besides good condition number and low-dimension) that allow for faster convergence of gradient descent. In particular, we precondition using Lewis weights to obtain an isotropic matrix with fewer rows and strong upper bounds on all row norms. We leverage these conditions to find a good initialization, which we use along with recent smoothing reductions and accelerated stochastic gradient descent algorithms to achieve $\epsilon$ relative error in $\widetilde{O}(nnz(\boldsymbol{\mathit{A}}) + d^{2.5} \epsilon^{-2})$ time with high probability, where $nnz(\boldsymbol{\mathit{A}})$ is the number of non-zeros in $\boldsymbol{\mathit{A}}$. This improves over the previous best result using gradient descent for $\ell_1$ regression. We also match the best known running times for interior point methods in several settings. Finally, we also show that if our original matrix $\boldsymbol{\mathit{A}}$ is approximately isotropic and the row norms are approximately equal, we can give an algorithm that avoids using fast matrix multiplication and obtains a running time of $\widetilde{O}(nnz(\boldsymbol{\mathit{A}}) + s d^{1.5}\epsilon^{-2} + d^2\epsilon^{-2})$, where $s$ is the maximum number of non-zeros in a row of $\boldsymbol{\mathit{A}}$. In this setting, we beat the best interior point methods for certain parameter regimes.
David Durfee, Kevin A. Lai, Saurabh Sawlani
COLT2
2018 Differential Privacy for Growing Databases
abstract
The large majority of differentially private algorithms focus on the static setting, where queries are made on an unchanging database. This is unsuitable for the myriad applications involving databases that grow over time. To address this gap in the literature, we consider the dynamic setting, in which new data arrive over time. Previous results in this setting have been limited to answering a single non-adaptive query repeatedly as the database grows. In contrast, we provide tools for richer and more adaptive analysis of growing databases. Our first contribution is a novel modification of the private multiplicative weights algorithm, which provides accurate analysis of exponentially many adaptive linear queries (an expressive query class including all counting queries) for a static database. Our modification maintains the accuracy guarantee of the static setting even as the database grows without bound. Our second contribution is a set of general results which show that many other private and accurate algorithms can be immediately extended to the dynamic setting by rerunning them at appropriate points of data growth with minimal loss of accuracy, even when data growth is unbounded.
Rachel Cummings, Sara Krehbiel, Kevin A. Lai, Uthaipon Tao Tantipongpipat
NeurIPS3
2016 Agnostic Estimation of Mean and Covariance
abstract
We consider the problem of estimating the mean and covariance of a distribution from i.i.d. samples in the presence of a fraction of malicious noise. This is in contrast to much recent work where the noise itself is assumed to be from a distribution of known type. The agnostic problem includes many interesting special cases, e.g., learning the parameters of a single Gaussian (or finding the best-fit Gaussian) when a fraction of data is adversarially corrupted, agnostically learning mixtures, agnostic ICA, etc. We present polynomial-time algorithms to estimate the mean and covariance with error guarantees in terms of information-theoretic lower bounds. As a corollary, we also obtain an agnostic algorithm for Singular Value Decomposition.
Kevin A. Lai, Anup B. Rao, Santosh S. Vempala
FOCS1
2016 Amortized rotation cost in AVL trees
Mahdi Amani, Kevin A. Lai, Robert E. Tarjan
Inf. Process. Lett.2
2015 Label optimal regret bounds for online local learning
abstract
We resolve an open question from Christiano (2014b) posed in COLT’14 regarding the optimal dependency of the regret achievable for online local learning on the size of the label set. In this framework, the algorithm is shown a pair of items at each step, chosen from a set of n items. The learner then predicts a label for each item, from a label set of size L and receives a real valued payoff. This is a natural framework which captures many interesting scenarios such as online gambling and online max cut. Christiano (2014a) designed an efficient online learning algorithm for this problem achieving a regret of O(\sqrtnL^3 T), where T is the number of rounds. Information theoretically, one can achieve a regret of O(\sqrtn \log L T). One of the main open questions left in this framework concerns closing the above gap. In this work, we provide a complete answer to the question above via two main results. We show, via a tighter analysis, that the semi-definite programming based algorithm of Christiano (2014a) in fact achieves a regret of O(\sqrtnLT). Second, we show a matching computational lower bound. Namely, we show that a polynomial time algorithm for online local learning with lower regret would imply a polynomial time algorithm for the planted clique problem which is widely believed to be hard. We prove a similar hardness result under a related conjecture concerning planted dense subgraphs that we put forth. Unlike planted clique, the planted dense subgraph problem does not have any known quasi-polynomial time algorithms. Computational lower bounds for online learning are relatively rare, and we hope that the ideas developed in this work will lead to lower bounds for other online learning scenarios as well.
Pranjal Awasthi, Moses Charikar, Kevin A. Lai, Andrej Risteski
COLT3