Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Megan L. Brown

dblp:164/7717 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Interaction techniques and input · 77% Usability and user experience research · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interaction techniques and input › non-visual interaction › auditory interaction
audio cues		 0.011989
An experiment into the use of auditory cues to reduce visual workload · CHI 1989
Usability and user experience research › visual perception › visual attention
visual search task		 0.011989
An experiment into the use of auditory cues to reduce visual workload · CHI 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

controlled experiment · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 An experiment into the use of auditory cues to reduce visual workload
abstract
The potential utility of dividing the information flowing from computer to human among several sensory modalities is investigated by means of a rigorous experiment which compares the effectiveness of auditory and visual cues in the performance of a visual search task. The results indicate that a complex auditory cue can be used to replace cues traditionally presented in the visual modality. Implications for the design of multimodal workstations are discussed.
Megan L. Brown, Sandra L. Newsome, Ephraim P. Glinert
 CHI1