Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Leah Kelley

dblp:164/8240 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 50% Legged, aerial and field robots · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
adaptive control
0.212015
Tip-over prevention: Adaptive control development and experimentation · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
field robotics
0.212015
Tip-over prevention: Adaptive control development and experimentation · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.212015
Tip-over prevention: Adaptive control development and experimentation · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › unmanned ground vehicle
tracked mobile robot
0.212015
Tip-over prevention: Adaptive control development and experimentation · ICRA 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

adaptive control · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Tip-over prevention: Adaptive control development and experimentation
abstract
Skid-steered, tracked, tele-operated robots are used to perform high-risk critical missions such as bomb disposal under conditions deemed too risky to send a human. Often the robots carry heavy payloads that raise their centers of mass, increasing the risk of tip-over. Since it is often not feasible to send a human to right a toppled robot, tip-over is equivalent to mission failure. Hence, an autonomous behavior to prevent robot tip-over is desired. In this research, a simplified model of mobile robot dynamics permits separation of pitch and roll stabilization. Adaptive control is used to stabilize the appropriate angle based on the normalized tip-over measure. Experimental validation of this control is successfully demonstrated on an iRobot Packbot and a Segway RMP 440.
Leah Kelley, Kurt A. Talke, Patrick Longhini, Garret Catron
ICRA1